Section of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Mar;57(3):635-41. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.017. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
Although dextran has been theorized to diminish the risk of stroke associated with carotid endarterectomy (CEA), variation exists in its use. We evaluated outcomes of dextran use in patients undergoing CEA to clarify its utility.
We studied all primary CEAs performed by 89 surgeons within the Vascular Study Group of New England database (2003-2010). Patients were stratified by intraoperative dextran use. Outcomes included perioperative death, stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and congestive heart failure (CHF). Group and propensity score matching was performed for risk-adjusted comparisons, and multivariable logistic and gamma regressions were used to examine associations between dextran use and outcomes.
There were 6641 CEAs performed, with dextran used in 334 procedures (5%). Dextran-treated and untreated patients were similar in age (70 years) and symptomatic status (25%). Clinical differences between the cohorts were eliminated by statistical adjustment. In crude, group-matched, and propensity-matched analyses, the stroke/death rate was similar for the two cohorts (1.2%). Dextran-treated patients were more likely to suffer postoperative MI (crude: 2.4% vs 1.0%; P = .03; group-matched: 2.4% vs 0.6%; P = .01; propensity-matched: 2.4% vs 0.5%; P = .003) and CHF (2.1% vs 0.6%; P = .01; 2.1% vs 0.5%; P = .01; 2.1% vs 0.2%; P < .001). In multivariable analysis of the crude sample, dextran was associated with a higher risk of postoperative MI (odds ratio, 3.52; 95% confidence interval, 1.62-7.64) and CHF (odds ratio, 5.71; 95% confidence interval, 2.35-13.89).
Dextran use was not associated with lower perioperative stroke but was associated with higher rates of MI and CHF. Taken together, our findings suggest limited clinical utility for routine use of intraoperative dextran during CEA.
虽然已有理论认为右旋糖酐可降低颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)相关卒中风险,但实际应用中仍存在差异。本研究旨在评估 CEA 术中应用右旋糖酐的患者结局,以明确其临床应用价值。
我们研究了血管研究组新英格兰数据库(2003-2010 年)中 89 位外科医生进行的所有初次 CEA。根据术中是否应用右旋糖酐将患者分层。观察终点包括围手术期死亡、卒中和心肌梗死(MI)、充血性心力衰竭(CHF)。通过组间和倾向评分匹配进行风险校正比较,并采用多变量逻辑回归和伽马回归分析右旋糖酐应用与结局之间的关系。
共进行了 6641 例 CEA,其中 334 例(5%)应用了右旋糖酐。接受和未接受右旋糖酐治疗的患者年龄(70 岁)和症状状态(25%)相似。通过统计学调整消除了两组间的临床差异。在未校正、组间匹配和倾向评分匹配分析中,两组间卒中/死亡率相似(1.2%)。与未接受右旋糖酐治疗的患者相比,接受右旋糖酐治疗的患者术后 MI(未校正:2.4% vs 1.0%;P =.03;组间匹配:2.4% vs 0.6%;P =.01;倾向评分匹配:2.4% vs 0.5%;P =.003)和 CHF(未校正:2.1% vs 0.6%;P =.01;2.1% vs 0.5%;P =.01;2.1% vs 0.2%;P <.001)的发生率更高。在未校正样本的多变量分析中,右旋糖酐与术后 MI(优势比,3.52;95%置信区间,1.62-7.64)和 CHF(优势比,5.71;95%置信区间,2.35-13.89)风险增加相关。
CEA 术中应用右旋糖酐并未降低围手术期卒中发生率,但与 MI 和 CHF 发生率增加相关。综上所述,我们的研究结果表明,在 CEA 术中常规应用右旋糖酐的临床获益有限。