Department of Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore.
J Surg Educ. 2013 Jan-Feb;70(1):48-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2012.07.002. Epub 2012 Aug 14.
This study aimed to assess surgical trainees' knot tying technique and determine the type and security of knots created.
Twenty-five participants were requested to tie 40 knots each, using Vicryl 2-0 and Prolene 2-0 sutures. With each suture material, the participants tied: in series 1, 4 knots as they would normally do during surgery; in series 2, 4 knots with 3 throws, 4 knots with 4 throws, 4 knots with 5 throws, and 4 knots with 6 throws. All knots were tested for tensile strength using a tensiometer. Knots with tensile strength of less than 5 N were considered dangerous.
Of the 25 participants, 2 created square knots consistently, 2 created a mixture of square and slip knots, and 21 created only slip knots. Square knots accounted for only 12.8% of all the knots. The incidence of knot slipping under tension was significantly lower with square knots (p < 0.001). Square knots had significantly higher tensile strength than slip knots (p < 0.001). For Vicryl, 4-throw square knots were superior to 6-throw slip knots (p < 0.001). For Prolene, 3-throw square knots were superior to 6-throw slip knots (p = 0.035). Some 12.6% of Vicryl knots and 5.6% of Prolene knots were dangerous and all of these were slip knots with up to 6 throws. Three out of 12 participants who thought they had created square knots actually created square knots and the rest produced slip knots. The participants' surgical experience did not have any correlation with their knot security (r = -0.044, p = 0.833).
Knot tying is often executed with technical errors resulting in slip knots with less than optimal security and high incidence of dangerous knots. Tensiometry testing could be used as an objective assessment tool for knot-tying competency for surgical trainees.
本研究旨在评估外科受训者的打结技术,并确定所打结的类型和安全性。
要求 25 名参与者使用薇乔 2-0 和 prolene 2-0 缝线,每人各打 40 个结。对于每种缝线材料,参与者分别进行以下操作:系列 1,以他们在手术中通常的方式打 4 个结;系列 2,打 4 个 3 叠结、4 个 4 叠结、4 个 5 叠结和 4 个 6 叠结。所有结均使用拉力计进行拉伸强度测试。拉伸强度小于 5 N 的结被认为是危险的。
在 25 名参与者中,有 2 人始终打方结,2 人混合打方结和滑结,21 人仅打滑结。方结仅占所有结的 12.8%。在张力下,滑结的结滑脱发生率明显较低(p < 0.001)。方结的拉伸强度明显高于滑结(p < 0.001)。对于薇乔缝线,4 叠方结优于 6 叠滑结(p < 0.001)。对于 prolene 缝线,3 叠方结优于 6 叠滑结(p = 0.035)。12.6%的薇乔结和 5.6%的 prolene 结是危险的,所有这些都是最多 6 叠的滑结。12 名参与者中有 3 名认为自己打了方结,实际上打了方结,其余的打了滑结。参与者的手术经验与他们的结安全性没有任何相关性(r = -0.044,p = 0.833)。
打结技术经常存在技术错误,导致滑结安全性较差,危险结的发生率较高。张力测试可作为评估外科受训者打结能力的客观评估工具。