Silver Eric, Wu Rong, Grady James, Song Liansheng
Student, University of Connecticut School of Dental Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, CT.
Research Associate, Biostatistics Center, Connecticut Institute for Clinical and Translational Science, University of Connecticut, Farmington, CT.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Jul;74(7):1304-12. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2016.02.004. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
To measure knot security in relation to different surgical knotting techniques, suture materials, suture sizes, and number of throws commonly used in oral and maxillofacial surgery.
Three surgical tying techniques were tested: square, surgeon's, and sliding knots. Suture materials included chromic gut, nylon, silk, and Vicryl (polyglycolic acid). Suture diameter sizes 3-0, 4-0, and 5-0 were tested. Ten trials were undertaken for each combination of material, size, and technique using 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 throws (ties). Suture materials were presoaked in 0.9% saline solution for 15 minutes to simulate the environment of the oral cavity. A standard knot-tying force for each throw was applied to each combination. Knot security satisfaction was set from pilot experimental trials at less than 1.8-mm slippage from the center of the knot while testing. The dichotomous outcome of knot slippage (stable or unstable) was analyzed using logistic regression analysis and odds ratios with Tukey-adjusted 95% confidence intervals.
Knot security depended on suture technique, material, and number of throws but did not depend on suture size. In general, 4 throws were required for surgeon's and square knots, whereas 5 throws were required for sliding knots. After 5 throws, tying an additional throw did not contribute to knot security. Surgeon's knots were stronger than square knots and sliding knots (P < .0001 and P < .0001). Square knots were stronger than sliding knots (P = .01). Vicryl had the greatest knot security, followed by chromic gut, nylon, and silk.
This study showed that knot security depends on suture material, tying technique, and number of throws, but is independent of suture size. Surgeon's knot security was greater than that for square and sliding knots when using sutures commonly used in the oral cavity. Vicryl had the greatest knot security and silk had the least. For surgeon's and square knots, at least 4 throws were generally indicated to achieve knot security; for sliding knots, at least 5 throws were generally indicated. Knot security did not increase after 5 throws and 2 throws are never indicated.
测量与口腔颌面外科常用的不同手术打结技术、缝合材料、缝合线尺寸及打结次数相关的结安全性。
测试了三种手术打结技术:方结、外科结和滑结。缝合材料包括铬制肠线、尼龙、丝线和薇乔(聚乙醇酸)。测试了3-0、4-0和5-0的缝合线直径尺寸。针对材料、尺寸和技术的每种组合,使用2、3、4、5和6次打结(系扣)进行了10次试验。将缝合材料在0.9%盐溶液中预浸泡15分钟以模拟口腔环境。对每种组合施加每次打结的标准打结力。根据预试验确定,在测试时结安全性满意度设定为结中心的滑动小于1.8毫米。使用逻辑回归分析和带有Tukey调整的95%置信区间的优势比分析结滑动(稳定或不稳定)的二分结果。
结安全性取决于缝合技术、材料和打结次数,但不取决于缝合线尺寸。一般来说,外科结和方结需要4次打结,而滑结需要5次打结。5次打结后,再额外打一次结并不会提高结安全性。外科结比方结和滑结更牢固(P < .0001和P < .0001)。方结比滑结更牢固(P = .01)。薇乔的结安全性最高,其次是铬制肠线、尼龙和丝线。
本研究表明,结安全性取决于缝合材料、打结技术和打结次数,但与缝合线尺寸无关。使用口腔常用缝合线时,外科结的安全性高于方结和滑结。薇乔的结安全性最高,丝线的最低。对于外科结和方结,一般至少需要4次打结以确保结安全性;对于滑结,一般至少需要5次打结。5次打结后结安全性不会增加,且从不建议打2次结。