Suppr超能文献

骨科手术带教老师与学员在打结技术中抗张强度的差异。

Differences of tensile strength in knot tying technique between orthopaedic surgical instructors and trainees.

机构信息

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjukuku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan.

Keio Orthopedic Advancing Squad for the Interactive Study (OASIS), Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

BMC Surg. 2021 Feb 6;21(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01079-5.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Knot tying technique is an extremely important basic skill for all surgeons. Clinically, knot slippage or suture breakage will lead to wound complications. Although some previous studies described the knot-tying technique of medical students or trainees, little information had been reported on the knot-tying technique of instructors. The objective of the preset study was to assess surgeons' manual knot tying techniques and to investigate the differences of tensile strength in knot tying technique between surgical instructors and trainees.

METHODS

A total of 48 orthopaedic surgeons (postgraduate year: PGY 2-18) participated. Surgeons were requested to tie surgical knots manually using same suture material. They were divided into two groups based on each career; instructors and trainees. Although four open conventional knots with four throws were chosen and done with self-selected methods, knot tying practice to have the appropriate square knots was done as education only for trainees before the actual trial. The knots were placed over a 30 cm long custom made smooth polished surface with two cylindrical rods. All knots were tested for tensile strength using a tensiometer. The surgical loops were loaded until the knot slipped or the suture broke. The tensile strength of each individual knot was defined as the force (N) required to result in knot failure. Simultaneously, knot failure was evaluated based on knot slippage or suture rupture. In terms of tensile strength or knot failure, statistical comparison was performed between groups using two-tailed Mann-Whitney U test or Fisher exact probability test, respectively.

RESULTS

Twenty-four instructors (PGY6-PGY18) and 24 trainees (PGY2-PGY5) were enrolled. Tensile strength was significantly greater in trainees (83.0 ± 27.7 N) than in instructors (49.9 ± 34.4 N, P = 0.0246). The ratio of slippage was significantly larger in instructors than in trainees (P < 0.001). Knot slippage (31.8 ± 17.7 N) was significantly worse than suture rupture (89.9 ± 22.2 N, P < 0.001) in tensile strength.

CONCLUSIONS

Mean tensile strength of knots done by trainees after practice was judged to be greater than that done by instructors in the present study. Clinically, knot slippage can lead to wound dehiscence, compared to suture rupture.

摘要

背景

打结技术是所有外科医生都必须掌握的一项基本技能。临床上,结扣滑脱或缝线断裂会导致伤口并发症。虽然之前的一些研究描述了医学生或受训者的打结技术,但关于指导者的打结技术的信息却很少。本研究的目的是评估外科医生的手动打结技术,并研究外科指导者和受训者在打结技术方面的拉伸强度差异。

方法

共有 48 名骨科医生(住院医师年限:PGY2-18)参与了这项研究。要求医生使用相同的缝线材料手动进行外科结。他们根据职业分为两组:指导者和受训者。尽管选择了四种四抛的开放式常规结,并采用了自选方法,但仅为受训者提供了打结练习,以便在实际试验前掌握适当的方结。将结放置在定制的 30cm 长的光滑抛光表面上,表面有两个圆柱形棒。使用拉力计测试所有结的拉伸强度。外科环被加载,直到结扣滑脱或缝线断裂。每个单独结的拉伸强度定义为导致结扣失败所需的力(N)。同时,根据结扣滑脱或缝线断裂评估结扣失败。在拉伸强度或结扣失败方面,分别使用双侧曼-惠特尼 U 检验或 Fisher 确切概率检验对组间进行统计比较。

结果

共有 24 名指导者(PGY6-PGY18)和 24 名受训者(PGY2-PGY5)入组。受训者的拉伸强度明显大于指导者(83.0±27.7N 比 49.9±34.4N,P=0.0246)。指导者的结扣滑脱率明显大于受训者(P<0.001)。在拉伸强度方面,结扣滑脱(31.8±17.7N)明显差于缝线断裂(89.9±22.2N,P<0.001)。

结论

在本研究中,经过练习后,受训者打结的平均拉伸强度被认为大于指导者。临床上,结扣滑脱会导致伤口裂开,而缝线断裂则不会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cf86/7866735/a54f5bd7f5fb/12893_2021_1079_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验