Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services Research, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 725 Martin Luther King Jr. Blvd, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7590, USA.
Contemp Clin Trials. 2013 May;35(1):1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2013.01.001. Epub 2013 Jan 20.
Prevention and treatment standards are based on evidence obtained in behavioral and clinical research. However, racial and ethnic minorities remain relatively absent from the science that develops these standards. While investigators have successfully recruited participants for individual studies using tailored recruitment methods, these strategies require considerable time and resources. Research registries, typically developed around a disease or condition, serve as a promising model for a targeted recruitment method to increase minority participation in health research. This study assessed the tailored recruitment methods used to populate a health research registry targeting African-American community members.
We describe six recruitment methods applied between September 2004 and October 2008 to recruit members into a health research registry. Recruitment included direct (existing studies, public databases, community outreach) and indirect methods (radio, internet, and email) targeting the general population, local universities, and African American communities. We conducted retrospective analysis of the recruitment by method using descriptive statistics, frequencies, and chi-square statistics.
During the recruitment period, 608 individuals enrolled in the research registry. The majority of enrollees were African American, female, and in good health. Direct and indirect methods were identified as successful strategies for subgroups. Findings suggest significant associations between recruitment methods and age, presence of existing health condition, prior research participation, and motivation to join the registry.
A health research registry can be a successful tool to increase minority awareness of research opportunities. Multi-pronged recruitment approaches are needed to reach diverse subpopulations.
预防和治疗标准基于在行为和临床研究中获得的证据。然而,少数民族和族裔在制定这些标准的科学研究中仍然相对缺乏。虽然研究人员已经成功地使用定制的招募方法为个别研究招募了参与者,但这些策略需要相当多的时间和资源。研究登记处通常围绕一种疾病或病症开发,是一种针对特定人群增加少数民族参与健康研究的有前途的招募方法模型。本研究评估了用于填充针对非裔美国人社群成员的健康研究登记处的定制招募方法。
我们描述了 2004 年 9 月至 2008 年 10 月期间用于招募健康研究登记处成员的六种招募方法。招募包括针对一般人群、当地大学和非裔美国人社区的直接(现有研究、公共数据库、社区外展)和间接方法(广播、互联网和电子邮件)。我们使用描述性统计、频率和卡方检验对按方法进行的招募进行了回顾性分析。
在招募期间,有 608 人注册了研究登记处。大多数参与者是非裔美国人、女性,身体健康。直接和间接方法被确定为针对特定群体的成功策略。研究结果表明,招募方法与年龄、现有健康状况、以前的研究参与以及加入登记处的动机之间存在显著关联。
健康研究登记处可以成为提高少数民族对研究机会的认识的有效工具。需要多管齐下的招募方法来覆盖不同的亚人群。