Department of Psychology, Utrecht University, 3584 CS Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013 Feb 12;110(7):2506-10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1217316110. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
Contemporary economic models hold that instrumental and impulsive behaviors underlie human social decision making. The amygdala is assumed to be involved in social-economic behavior, but its role in human behavior is poorly understood. Rodent research suggests that the basolateral amygdala (BLA) subserves instrumental behaviors and regulates the central-medial amygdala, which subserves impulsive behaviors. The human amygdala, however, typically is investigated as a single unit. If these rodent data could be translated to humans, selective dysfunction of the human BLA might constrain instrumental social-economic decisions and result in more impulsive social-economic choice behavior. Here we show that humans with selective BLA damage and a functional central-medial amygdala invest nearly 100% more money in unfamiliar others in a trust game than do healthy controls. We furthermore show that this generosity is not caused by risk-taking deviations in nonsocial contexts. Moreover, these BLA-damaged subjects do not expect higher returns or perceive people as more trustworthy, implying that their generous investments are not instrumental in nature. These findings suggest that the human BLA is essential for instrumental behaviors in social-economic interactions.
当代经济模型认为,工具性和冲动性行为是人类社会决策的基础。杏仁核被认为参与社会经济行为,但它在人类行为中的作用还不清楚。啮齿动物研究表明,基底外侧杏仁核(BLA)支持工具性行为,并调节中央内侧杏仁核,后者支持冲动性行为。然而,人类杏仁核通常被作为一个单一的单元进行研究。如果这些啮齿动物数据可以转化为人类,那么人类 BLA 的选择性功能障碍可能会限制工具性社会经济决策,并导致更冲动的社会经济选择行为。在这里,我们发现,与健康对照组相比,选择性 BLA 损伤和功能性中央内侧杏仁核的人类在信任游戏中投资于不熟悉的他人的金额几乎增加了 100%。我们还表明,这种慷慨并不是由于非社交情境中的冒险偏差造成的。此外,这些 BLA 损伤的受试者并不期望更高的回报或认为人们更值得信赖,这意味着他们的慷慨投资不是出于工具性的本质。这些发现表明,人类 BLA 对于社会经济互动中的工具性行为至关重要。