• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

误导性的假设:英国医学协会(BMA)和国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)关于器官获取和“选择退出”或“默认同意”的指导意见。

Misguided presumptions: British Medical Association (BMA) and National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance on organ retrieval and 'opt out' or 'presumed consent'.

机构信息

Isle of Wight NHS Trust.

出版信息

Clin Med (Lond). 2012 Dec;12(6):513-6. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.12-6-513.

DOI:10.7861/clinmedicine.12-6-513
PMID:23342402
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5922588/
Abstract

Three documents have been produced in an attempt to increase the number of organs available for transplant: a National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) clinical guideline, a British Medical Association (BMA) report and a Welsh Government white paper. All three are ethically flawed: NICE and the BMA recommend that whenever there is intention to withdraw life-sustaining treatment and death is expected, patients should instead be stabilised to assess for donation. This is contrary to patients' best interests, the principles of mental capacity legislation and current criteria for accessing intensive care units. Regarding consent, the BMA and Welsh Government recommend an 'opt-out' policy, but consent in law requires information and cannot be 'presumed' or 'deemed' on the basis of failure to express or register 'opting out'. The language of all three proposals is manipulative, and patient trust may be undermined because the doctor's attention must move from the interests of the patient to those of the unknown organ recipients.

摘要

为了增加可用于移植的器官数量,已经生成了三份文件:一份英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)临床指南、一份英国医学协会(BMA)报告和一份威尔士政府白皮书。这三份文件在伦理上都存在缺陷:NICE 和 BMA 建议,只要有意图撤回维持生命的治疗并预计死亡,就应稳定患者以评估捐赠。这违背了患者的最大利益、精神能力立法原则和目前进入重症监护病房的标准。关于同意,BMA 和威尔士政府建议采用“选择退出”政策,但法律上的同意需要信息,并且不能基于未表达或登记“选择退出”而“假定”或“视为”。这三个建议的措辞都是操纵性的,可能会破坏患者的信任,因为医生的注意力必须从患者的利益转移到未知器官接受者的利益。

相似文献

1
Misguided presumptions: British Medical Association (BMA) and National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidance on organ retrieval and 'opt out' or 'presumed consent'.误导性的假设:英国医学协会(BMA)和国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)关于器官获取和“选择退出”或“默认同意”的指导意见。
Clin Med (Lond). 2012 Dec;12(6):513-6. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.12-6-513.
2
BMA and NICE guidance on organ retrieval: neither misguided nor presumptuous.英国医学协会和国家卫生与临床优化研究所关于器官获取的指南:既不误导也不专横。
Clin Med (Lond). 2012 Dec;12(6):517-9. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.12-6-517.
3
Tissue and organ donation guidance.组织和器官捐赠指南。
Clin Med (Lond). 2013 Apr;13(2):215. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.13-2-215.
4
Opt-out organ donation without presumptions.自愿捐献器官,排除预设。
J Med Ethics. 2012 Feb;38(2):69-72. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2011-100039. Epub 2011 Aug 9.
5
Presumed consent to organ donation in three European countries.三个欧洲国家对器官捐赠的推定同意。
Nurs Ethics. 2009 May;16(3):267-82. doi: 10.1177/0969733009102687.
6
Legal and ethical implications of NICE guidance aimed at optimising organ transplantation after circulatory death.旨在优化循环死亡后器官移植的 NICE 指南的法律和伦理影响。
Clin Med (Lond). 2013 Aug;13(4):340-3. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.13-4-340.
7
Organ transplant and presumed consent: towards an "opting out" system.器官移植与推定同意:迈向“选择退出”系统
Indian J Med Ethics. 2009 Jul-Sep;6(3):149-52. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2009.047.
8
Presumed consent for organ donation: a clinically unnecessary and corrupting influence in medicine and politics.推定器官捐赠同意:医学和政治中一种临床上不必要且具有腐蚀性的影响。
Clin Med (Lond). 2014 Dec;14(6):567-71. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.14-6-567.
9
Presumed consent in organ donation: is the duty finally upon us?器官捐赠中的推定同意:这一责任最终落到我们身上了吗?
Eur J Health Law. 2010 Mar;17(2):149-64.
10
Normative consent and opt-out organ donation.规范性同意和退出式器官捐献。
J Med Ethics. 2010 Feb;36(2):84-7. doi: 10.1136/jme.2009.033423.

引用本文的文献

1
Legal and ethical implications of NICE guidance aimed at optimising organ transplantation after circulatory death.旨在优化循环死亡后器官移植的 NICE 指南的法律和伦理影响。
Clin Med (Lond). 2013 Aug;13(4):340-3. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.13-4-340.
2
BMA and NICE guidance on organ retrieval: neither misguided nor presumptuous.英国医学协会和国家卫生与临床优化研究所关于器官获取的指南:既不误导也不专横。
Clin Med (Lond). 2012 Dec;12(6):517-9. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.12-6-517.
3
A difficult dilemma.一个艰难的困境。
Clin Med (Lond). 2012 Dec;12(6):499-500. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.12-6-499.

本文引用的文献

1
Actively delaying death to increase organ donation.
BMJ. 2012 Feb 17;344:e1179. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e1179.
2
Who to admit to intensive care?该收治谁进入重症监护病房?
Clin Med (Lond). 2011 Dec;11(6):601-4. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.11-6-601.
3
Donor identification and consent for deceased organ donation: summary of NICE guidance.
BMJ. 2012 Jan 12;344:e341. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e341.