• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从需求到医疗保健需求。

From needs to health care needs.

作者信息

Gustavsson Erik

机构信息

Division of Health and Society, Department of Medical and Health Sciences, Linköping University, 581 83, Linköping, Sweden,

出版信息

Health Care Anal. 2014 Mar;22(1):22-35. doi: 10.1007/s10728-013-0241-8.

DOI:10.1007/s10728-013-0241-8
PMID:23344674
Abstract

One generally considered plausible way to allocate resources in health care is according to people's needs. In this paper I focus on a somewhat overlooked issue, that is the conceptual structure of health care needs. It is argued that what conceptual understanding of needs one has is decisive in the assessment of what qualifies as a health care need and what does not. The aim for this paper is a clarification of the concept of health care need with a starting point in the general philosophical discussion about needs. I outline three approaches to the concept of need and argue that they all share the same conceptual underpinnings. The concept of need is then analyzed in terms of a subject x needing some object y in order to achieve some goal z. I then discuss the relevant features of the object y and the goal z which make a given need qualify as a health care need and not just a need for anything.

摘要

在医疗保健领域,一种普遍被认为合理的资源分配方式是根据人们的需求。在本文中,我关注一个 somewhat 被忽视的问题,即医疗保健需求的概念结构。有人认为,对需求的概念理解在评估什么符合医疗保健需求以及什么不符合方面起着决定性作用。本文的目的是从关于需求的一般哲学讨论出发,澄清医疗保健需求的概念。我概述了三种需求概念的方法,并认为它们都具有相同的概念基础。需求概念随后根据主体x为了实现某个目标z而需要某个对象y来进行分析。然后,我讨论对象y和目标z的相关特征,这些特征使特定需求成为医疗保健需求,而不仅仅是对任何事物的需求。

相似文献

1
From needs to health care needs.从需求到医疗保健需求。
Health Care Anal. 2014 Mar;22(1):22-35. doi: 10.1007/s10728-013-0241-8.
2
Health care need: three interpretations.医疗保健需求:三种解读。
J Appl Philos. 2006;23(2):145-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2006.00325.x.
3
A reply to some Stern criticisms and a remark on health care rights.对斯特恩一些批评的回应以及关于医疗保健权利的评论。
J Med Philos. 1983 Nov;8(4):363-71. doi: 10.1093/jmp/8.4.363.
4
[The priority-setting platform and its conditions].[优先级设定平台及其条件]
Lakartidningen. 2019 Nov 28;116:FTSF.
5
Evidence, economics and ethics: resource allocation in health services organizations.证据、经济学与伦理学:卫生服务机构中的资源分配
Healthc Q. 2005;8(2):50-9, 4. doi: 10.12927/hcq..17099.
6
Needs, need, needing.需求,需要,需求着。
J Med Ethics. 1987 Jun;13(2):62-8. doi: 10.1136/jme.13.2.62.
7
Resource allocation after a nuclear detonation incident: unaltered standards of ethical decision making.核爆炸事件后的资源分配:不变的伦理决策标准。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2011 Mar;5 Suppl 1:S46-53. doi: 10.1001/dmp.2011.14.
8
Priority setting, justice, and health care: conceptual analysis.优先事项设定、公平与医疗保健:概念分析
Croat Med J. 2000 Dec;41(4):375-7.
9
Clarifying the concept of need: a comparison of two approaches to concept analysis.厘清需求概念:两种概念分析方法的比较
J Adv Nurs. 1997 Mar;25(3):471-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.1997025471.x.
10
Why We Don't Need "Unmet Needs"! On the Concepts of Unmet Need and Severity in Health-Care Priority Setting.为何我们不需要“未满足的需求”!论医疗保健优先级设定中未满足需求和严重程度的概念。
Health Care Anal. 2019 Mar;27(1):26-44. doi: 10.1007/s10728-018-0361-2.

引用本文的文献

1
Brazilian scale for evaluation of mental health care needs (CuidaSM): evidence of validity in primary health care.巴西精神卫生保健需求评估量表(CuidaSM):初级卫生保健中的效度证据
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 10;20(7):e0323833. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0323833. eCollection 2025.
2
The Association Between Internet Use and Co-occurring Health Care Needs: Cross-Sectional Study in China.互联网使用与并发医疗保健需求之间的关联:中国的横断面研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Apr 17;27:e67484. doi: 10.2196/67484.
3
Unmet health care needs among the working-age population: Evidence from the Great Recession in Spain (2008-2012).

本文引用的文献

1
An inquiry into the principles of needs-based allocation of health care.基于需求的医疗保健分配原则探究。
Bioethics. 2010 Nov;24(9):470-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01734.x.
2
Health care need: three interpretations.医疗保健需求:三种解读。
J Appl Philos. 2006;23(2):145-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-5930.2006.00325.x.
3
The significance of the goal of health care for the setting of priorities.医疗保健目标对于确定优先事项的意义。
劳动年龄人口中未满足的医疗保健需求:来自西班牙大衰退时期(2008 - 2012年)的证据
An Sist Sanit Navar. 2024 Dec 24;47(3):e1093. doi: 10.23938/ASSN.1093.
4
Improving equitable healthcare resource use: developing a neighbourhood district nurse needs index for staffing allocation.改善公平的医疗资源利用:开发社区护士需求指数以进行人员配置。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Nov 8;24(1):1362. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11832-0.
5
Should Severity Assessments in Healthcare Priority Setting be Risk- and Time-Sensitive?医疗保健资源配置中的严重程度评估是否应具有风险和时间敏感性?
Health Care Anal. 2023 Dec;31(3-4):169-185. doi: 10.1007/s10728-023-00460-0. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
6
Ethical, Translational, and Legal Issues Surrounding the Novel Adoption of Ectogestative Technologies.围绕新型外孕技术应用的伦理、转化及法律问题。
Risk Manag Healthc Policy. 2022 Nov 24;15:2207-2220. doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S358553. eCollection 2022.
7
An ethics analysis of the rationale for publicly funded plastic surgery.对公共资助整形手术的基本原理进行伦理分析。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Oct 2;21(1):94. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00539-6.
8
Why We Don't Need "Unmet Needs"! On the Concepts of Unmet Need and Severity in Health-Care Priority Setting.为何我们不需要“未满足的需求”!论医疗保健优先级设定中未满足需求和严重程度的概念。
Health Care Anal. 2019 Mar;27(1):26-44. doi: 10.1007/s10728-018-0361-2.
9
Prioritising, Ranking and Resource Implementation - A Normative Analysis.优先排序、分级和资源实施——规范分析。
Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Jun 1;7(6):532-541. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2017.125.
10
Principles of Need and the Aggregation Thesis.需求原则与聚合命题。
Health Care Anal. 2019 Jun;27(2):77-92. doi: 10.1007/s10728-017-0346-6.
Health Care Anal. 2003 Jun;11(2):161-9. doi: 10.1023/A:1025657130508.
4
Need--is a consensus possible?需求——有可能达成共识吗?
J Med Ethics. 1998 Apr;24(2):77-80. doi: 10.1136/jme.24.2.77.