• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

CORR 洞察™：有限切口优于标准全髋关节置换术吗？一项荟萃分析。

CORR Insights™: Is limited incision better than standard total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Middlemore Hospital, South Auckland Clinical School, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Apr;471(4):1295-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2795-z.

DOI:10.1007/s11999-013-2795-z
PMID:23344848
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3586022/
Abstract

This CORR Insights™ is a commentary on the article "Is Limited Incision Better Than Standard Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Meta-analysis" by Joseph T. Moskal MD and Susan G. Capps PhD available at DOI 10.1007/s11999-012-2717-5 .

摘要

这篇 CORR 观点是对约瑟夫·T·莫斯卡尔医学博士和苏珊·G·卡普斯博士的文章“有限切口优于标准全髋关节置换术吗？一项荟萃分析”的评论，文章可在 DOI 10.1007/s11999-012-2717-5 处获取。

相似文献

1
CORR Insights™: Is limited incision better than standard total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis.CORR 洞察™：有限切口优于标准全髋关节置换术吗？一项荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Apr;471(4):1295-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-013-2795-z.
2
CORR Insights™: Is limited incision better than standard total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis.CORR 洞察：有限切口优于标准全髋关节置换术吗？一项荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Apr;471(4):1297-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2752-2. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
3
Is limited incision better than standard total hip arthroplasty? A meta-analysis.有限切口是否优于标准全髋关节置换术？一项荟萃分析。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Apr;471(4):1283-94. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2717-5. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
4
A systematic review and meta-analysis of the standard versus mini-incision posterior approach to total hip arthroplasty.系统评价和荟萃分析标准与微创切口后入路全髋关节置换术。
J Arthroplasty. 2014 Oct;29(10):1970-82. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.05.021. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
5
Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, blinded study.后路微创与传统全髋关节置换术后的早期疼痛缓解及功能。一项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jun;89(6):1153-60. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00940.
6
Component position in 2-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty compared to standard total hip arthroplasty.与标准全髋关节置换术相比，两切口微创全髋关节置换术中的组件位置。
J Arthroplasty. 2008 Feb;23(2):197-202. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2006.12.045.
7
Good start on using biochemical markers to compare surgical trauma in total hip replacement approaches: commentary on an article by Patrick F. Bergin, MD, et al.: "Comparison of minimally invasive direct anterior versus posterior total hip arthroplasty based on inflammation and muscle damage markers".在使用生化标志物比较全髋关节置换手术入路的手术创伤方面有了良好开端：对医学博士帕特里克·F·伯金等人所著文章《基于炎症和肌肉损伤标志物的微创直接前路与后路全髋关节置换术比较》的评论
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Aug 3;93(15):e89. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.K.00625.
8
CORR Insights™: Can a triple pelvic osteotomy for adult symptomatic hip dysplasia provide relief of symptoms for 25 years?CORR 洞察™：对于成人症状性髋关节发育不良，三部分骨盆截骨术能否提供 25 年的症状缓解？
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013 Feb;471(2):591-2. doi: 10.1007/s11999-012-2702-z. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
9
Total hip arthroplasty: minimally invasive surgery or not? Meta-analysis of clinical trials.全髋关节置换术：微创还是非微创？临床试验的荟萃分析。
Int Orthop. 2019 Jul;43(7):1573-1582. doi: 10.1007/s00264-018-4124-3. Epub 2018 Aug 31.
10
Minimal incision total hip arthroplasty.微创全髋关节置换术。
J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2007 Dec;15(12):707-15. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200712000-00004.

引用本文的文献

1
Mini-incision versus standard incision total hip arthroplasty regarding surgical outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.微创切口与标准切口全髋关节置换术的手术效果比较：一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2013 Nov 12;8(11):e80021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0080021. eCollection 2013.

本文引用的文献

1
[The minimally invasive anterolateral approach. A review of the literature].[微创前外侧入路。文献综述]
Orthopade. 2012 May;41(5):377-81. doi: 10.1007/s00132-011-1892-5.
2
A comparison of a less invasive piriformis-sparing approach versus the standard posterior approach to the hip: A randomised controlled trial.一种微创保留梨状肌入路与标准髋关节后入路的比较：一项随机对照试验。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Jan;94(1):43-50. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.94B1.27001.
3
Functional recovery, complications and CT positioning of total hip replacement performed through a Röttinger anterolateral mini-incision. Review of a continuous series of 103 cases.经 Röttinger 前外侧小切口行全髋关节置换术的功能恢复、并发症和 CT 定位。连续 103 例的回顾性研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012 Feb;98(1):8-16. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2011.10.005. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
4
Accuracy of acetabular cup placement in computer-assisted, minimally-invasive THR in a lateral decubitus position.在侧卧位下计算机辅助微创全髋关节置换术中髋臼杯位置的准确性。
Int Orthop. 2011 Jun;35(6):809-15. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1042-4. Epub 2010 May 21.
5
Minimally invasive versus classic procedures in total hip arthroplasty: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.全髋关节置换术中微创与经典手术的比较：一项双盲随机对照试验。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011 Jan;469(1):200-8. doi: 10.1007/s11999-010-1331-7. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
6
No benefit of the two-incision THA over mini-posterior THA: a pilot study of strength and gait.双切口全髋关节置换术与微创后外侧入路全髋关节置换术比较：一项关于力量和步态的初步研究。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010 Feb;468(2):565-70. doi: 10.1007/s11999-009-0780-3. Epub 2009 Mar 28.
7
Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review.微创全髋关节置换术：系统评价。
Int Orthop. 2009 Dec;33(6):1473-81. doi: 10.1007/s00264-009-0743-z. Epub 2009 Mar 11.
8
Patients preferred a mini-posterior THA to a contralateral two-incision THA.患者更喜欢微创后外侧全髋关节置换术而非对侧双切口全髋关节置换术。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Dec;453:156-9. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000238858.38992.2d.
9
Total hip replacement and the law of diminishing returns.全髋关节置换与收益递减规律
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Jul;88(7):1664-73. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00218.