Orthopedic Department, Asklepios Klinik Bad Abbach, Bad Abbach, Germany.
Int Orthop. 2011 Jun;35(6):809-15. doi: 10.1007/s00264-010-1042-4. Epub 2010 May 21.
In a prospective and randomised clinical study, we implanted acetabular cups either by means of an image-free computer-navigation system (navigated group, n = 32) or by free-hand technique (freehand group n = 32, two drop-outs). Total hip replacement was conducted in the lateral position and through a minimally invasive anterior approach (MicroHip). The position of the component was determined postoperatively on CT scans of the pelvis using CT-planning software. We found an average inclination of 42.3° (range 32.7-50.6°; SD ± 3.8°) and an average anteversion of 24.5° (range 12.0-33.3°; SD ± 6.0°) in the computer-assisted study group and an average inclination of 37.9° (range 25.6-50.2°; SD ± 6.3°) and an average anteversion of 23.8° (range 5.6-46.9°; SD ± 10.1°) in the freehand group. The higher precision of computer navigation was indicated by the lower standard deviations. For both measurements we found a significant heterogeneity of variances (p < 0.05, Levene's test). The mean difference between the cup inclination/anteversion values displayed by computer navigation and the true cup position (CT control) was 0.37° (SD 3.26) and -5.61° (SD 6.48), respectively. We found a bias (underestimation) with regard to anteversion determined by the imageless computer navigation system. A bias for inclination was not found. Registration of the landmarks of the anterior pelvic plane in lateral position with undraped percutaneous methods leads to an error in cup anteversion, but not to an error in cup inclination. The bias we found is consistent with a correct registration of the anterosuperior iliac spine (ASIS) and with a registration of the symphysis 1 cm above the bone, corresponding to the less compressible overlying soft tissue in this region. There was no significant correlation between the bias and the thickness of soft tissue above the pubic tubercles. We suggest use of a percutaneous registration of ASIS and an invasive registration above the pubic tubercles when computer-assisted navigation is performed in minimally invasive THR in a lateral position.
在一项前瞻性、随机的临床研究中,我们通过无图像计算机导航系统(导航组,n=32)或徒手技术(徒手组,n=32,两名脱落)植入髋臼杯。全髋关节置换术采用侧卧位和微创前路入路(MicroHip)进行。术后通过骨盆 CT 扫描和 CT 规划软件确定组件位置。我们发现计算机辅助组的平均倾斜度为 42.3°(范围为 32.7°-50.6°;标准差±3.8°)和平均前倾角为 24.5°(范围为 12.0°-33.3°;标准差±6.0°),而徒手组的平均倾斜度为 37.9°(范围为 25.6°-50.2°;标准差±6.3°)和平均前倾角为 23.8°(范围为 5.6°-46.9°;标准差±10.1°)。较低的标准偏差表明计算机导航的精度更高。对于这两个测量值,我们发现方差存在显著异质性(p<0.05,Levene 检验)。计算机导航显示的杯倾斜/前倾角值与真实杯位置(CT 对照)之间的平均差异为 0.37°(标准差 3.26)和-5.61°(标准差 6.48)。我们发现无图像计算机导航系统确定的前倾角存在偏差(低估)。未发现倾斜度存在偏差。在侧卧位下,对未覆盖的经皮前路骨盆平面的标志进行注册会导致杯前倾角的误差,但不会导致杯倾斜度的误差。我们发现的偏差与前上髂棘(ASIS)的正确注册以及耻骨上方 1cm 处的耻骨联合的注册一致,这与该区域较不易压缩的覆盖软组织相对应。偏差与耻骨结节上方软组织的厚度之间无显著相关性。当在侧卧位下进行微创 THR 时,我们建议在计算机辅助导航中使用经皮 ASIS 注册和耻骨结节上方的侵入性注册。