• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项前瞻性研究考察了一项支持性就业计划和就业对 SCI 退伍军人的健康相关生活质量、残疾和残障的影响。

A prospective examination of the impact of a supported employment program and employment on health-related quality of life, handicap, and disability among Veterans with SCI.

机构信息

Health Services Research and Development Service (HSR&D) and Rehabilitation Research and Development Service (RR&D) Center of Excellence Maximizing Rehabilitation Outcomes, James A. Haley Veterans' Hospital, 8900 Grand Oak Circle (118M), Tampa, FL, 33637, USA,

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2013 Oct;22(8):2133-41. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0353-5. Epub 2013 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-013-0353-5
PMID:23345022
Abstract

PURPOSES

To investigate impact of participation in a supported employment program and impact of employment itself on health-related quality of life (HRQOL), disability, and handicap among Veterans with spinal cord injury (SCI).

METHODS

We used a prospective, randomized, controlled, multi-site trial of supported employment (SE) versus treatment as usual (TAU) for vocational issues. Subjects were 157 Veterans with SCI who received either SE or TAU for vocational issues. Outcomes were examined in terms of type of vocational treatment received and whether competitive employment was obtained. Outcomes investigated were HRQOL as measured by the Veterans RAND 36-item health survey (VR-36), handicap as measured by the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique (CHART), and disability as measured by the functional independence measure (FIM). Subjects were assessed at baseline and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between Veterans who participated in SE compared to those who received TAU in study measures. Participants obtaining competitive employment demonstrated significantly higher scores on the Social Integration, Mobility, and Occupation dimensions of the CHART. There were no observed differences in VR-36 scores or FIM scores for those obtaining competitive employment.

CONCLUSION(S): This study suggests that employment has a positive effect on an individual's ability to participate in social relationships, move about their home and community, and spend time in productive and usual roles. Inability to detect differences across other domains of handicap or any changes in HRQOL may have been due to several factors including level and intensity of employment, insufficient follow-up period, or measurement limitations.

摘要

目的

调查参与支持性就业计划以及就业本身对脊髓损伤(SCI)退伍军人的健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)、残疾和障碍的影响。

方法

我们使用了一项支持性就业(SE)与常规治疗(TAU)的前瞻性、随机、对照、多地点职业问题试验。研究对象为 157 名接受 SE 或 TAU 职业治疗的 SCI 退伍军人。根据所接受的职业治疗类型以及是否获得竞争性就业来评估结果。研究的结果包括使用退伍军人 RAND 36 项健康调查(VR-36)测量的 HRQOL、使用 Craig 残疾评估和报告技术(CHART)测量的残疾和障碍以及使用功能独立性测量(FIM)测量的残疾。在基线以及 3、6、9 和 12 个月时对受试者进行评估。

结果

与接受 TAU 的退伍军人相比,参与 SE 的退伍军人在研究测量方面没有显著差异。获得竞争性就业的参与者在 CHART 的社会融合、移动性和职业维度上的得分明显更高。获得竞争性就业的人在 VR-36 评分或 FIM 评分方面没有观察到差异。

结论

这项研究表明,就业对个人参与社会关系、在家庭和社区中移动以及在生产和常规角色中度过时间的能力具有积极影响。在其他残疾领域或 HRQOL 方面无法检测到差异可能是由于多种因素造成的,包括就业的水平和强度、随访时间不足或测量限制。

相似文献

1
A prospective examination of the impact of a supported employment program and employment on health-related quality of life, handicap, and disability among Veterans with SCI.一项前瞻性研究考察了一项支持性就业计划和就业对 SCI 退伍军人的健康相关生活质量、残疾和残障的影响。
Qual Life Res. 2013 Oct;22(8):2133-41. doi: 10.1007/s11136-013-0353-5. Epub 2013 Jan 24.
2
Effectiveness of supported employment for veterans with spinal cord injuries: results from a randomized multisite study.支持性就业对脊髓损伤退伍军人的有效性:一项随机多站点研究的结果。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 May;93(5):740-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.01.002.
3
Effectiveness of supported employment for veterans with spinal cord injury: 2-year results.脊髓损伤退伍军人的支持性就业的效果:2 年的结果。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Apr;95(4):784-90. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.11.012. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
4
Quality of Life Outcomes for Veterans With Spinal Cord Injury Receiving Individual Placement and Support (IPS).接受个别安置与支持(IPS)的脊髓损伤退伍军人的生活质量结果
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018 Fall;24(4):325-335. doi: 10.1310/sci17-00046. Epub 2018 May 3.
5
Cost-effectiveness of supported employment for veterans with spinal cord injuries.脊髓损伤退伍军人支持性就业的成本效益
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014 Jul;95(7):1254-61. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2014.01.010. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
6
The impact of social support at home on health-related quality of life among veterans with spinal cord injury participating in a supported employment program.在家中的社会支持对参与支持性就业项目的脊髓损伤退伍军人健康相关生活质量的影响。
Qual Life Res. 2015 Jul;24(7):1741-7. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0912-4. Epub 2015 Jan 11.
7
Individual Placement and Support in Spinal Cord Injury: A Longitudinal Observational Study of Employment Outcomes.脊髓损伤患者的个别安置与支持:就业成果的纵向观察研究
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Aug;98(8):1567-1575.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.12.010. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
8
Relationship Between Comorbidities and Employment Among Veterans with Spinal Cord Injury.脊髓损伤退伍军人的合并症与就业之间的关系
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018 Winter;24(1):44-53. doi: 10.1310/sci16-00047. Epub 2017 Sep 27.
9
Facilitators and barriers to employment among veterans with spinal cord injury receiving 12 months of evidence-based supported employment services.接受为期12个月循证支持性就业服务的脊髓损伤退伍军人就业的促进因素和障碍
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2015 Winter;21(1):20-30. doi: 10.1310/sci2101-20.
10
Employment, health outcomes, and life satisfaction after spinal cord injury: comparison of veterans and nonveterans.脊髓损伤后的就业、健康结果和生活满意度:退伍军人与非退伍军人的比较。
Spinal Cord. 2020 Jan;58(1):3-10. doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0334-9. Epub 2019 Aug 6.

引用本文的文献

1
A Scoping Review of Vocational Rehabilitation Programs for People with Acquired Physical Disabilities.后天性身体残疾者职业康复计划的范围综述
J Occup Rehabil. 2025 Aug 15. doi: 10.1007/s10926-025-10322-2.
2
A Narrative Review of Vocational Rehabilitation in People with Spinal Cord Injury in Different Countries.不同国家脊髓损伤患者职业康复的叙述性综述
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2024 Jul 3;38:76. doi: 10.47176/mjiri.38.76. eCollection 2024.
3
Return to work post spinal cord injury through a comprehensive rehabilitative program: A case series.

本文引用的文献

1
Association between the functional independence measure following spinal cord injury and long-term outcomes.脊髓损伤后功能独立性测量与长期结局的关联。
Spinal Cord. 2012 Oct;50(10):728-33. doi: 10.1038/sc.2012.50. Epub 2012 May 29.
2
Effectiveness of supported employment for veterans with spinal cord injuries: results from a randomized multisite study.支持性就业对脊髓损伤退伍军人的有效性:一项随机多站点研究的结果。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 May;93(5):740-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.01.002.
3
Predicting employment status at 2 years' postdischarge from spinal cord injury rehabilitation.
通过综合康复计划实现脊髓损伤后重返工作岗位:病例系列
J Spinal Cord Med. 2025 Jan;48(1):141-147. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2023.2265099. Epub 2023 Nov 17.
4
Adjusted Indirect and Mixed Comparisons of Interventions for the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) of Disabled Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis.调整后的残疾成年人报告结局指标(PROMs)干预措施的间接和混合比较:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 1;18(5):2406. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052406.
5
Job Accommodations, Return to Work and Job Retention of People with Physical Disabilities: A Systematic Review.身体残疾人士的工作调整、重返工作岗位和工作保留:系统评价。
J Occup Rehabil. 2021 Sep;31(3):474-490. doi: 10.1007/s10926-020-09954-3. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
6
Supported employment: Meta-analysis and review of randomized controlled trials of individual placement and support.支持性就业:个体安置与支持的随机对照试验的荟萃分析和综述。
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 20;14(2):e0212208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0212208. eCollection 2019.
7
Quality of Life Outcomes for Veterans With Spinal Cord Injury Receiving Individual Placement and Support (IPS).接受个别安置与支持(IPS)的脊髓损伤退伍军人的生活质量结果
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018 Fall;24(4):325-335. doi: 10.1310/sci17-00046. Epub 2018 May 3.
8
Factors Which Facilitate or Impede Interpersonal Interactions and Relationships after Spinal Cord Injury: A Scoping Review with Suggestions for Rehabilitation.脊髓损伤后促进或阻碍人际互动及关系的因素:一项范围综述及康复建议
Rehabil Res Pract. 2016;2016:9373786. doi: 10.1155/2016/9373786. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
9
The impact of social support at home on health-related quality of life among veterans with spinal cord injury participating in a supported employment program.在家中的社会支持对参与支持性就业项目的脊髓损伤退伍军人健康相关生活质量的影响。
Qual Life Res. 2015 Jul;24(7):1741-7. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0912-4. Epub 2015 Jan 11.
预测脊髓损伤康复出院后 2 年的就业状况。
Rehabil Psychol. 2011 Aug;56(3):251-256. doi: 10.1037/a0024524.
4
Methods of a multisite randomized clinical trial of supported employment among veterans with spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤退伍军人支持性就业多中心随机临床试验方法
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2009;46(7):919-30. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2008.10.0145.
5
The long-term impact of employment on mental health service use and costs for persons with severe mental illness.就业对严重精神疾病患者心理健康服务利用及成本的长期影响。
Psychiatr Serv. 2009 Aug;60(8):1024-31. doi: 10.1176/ps.2009.60.8.1024.
6
The impact of supported employment and working on clinical and social functioning: results of an international study of individual placement and support.支持性就业及工作对临床和社会功能的影响:一项关于个别安置与支持的国际研究结果
Schizophr Bull. 2009 Sep;35(5):949-58. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbn024. Epub 2008 Apr 9.
7
Factors associated with health-related quality of life in chronic spinal cord injury.慢性脊髓损伤中与健康相关生活质量相关的因素。
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007 May;86(5):387-96. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e31804a7d00.
8
Aging after spinal cord injury: A 30-year longitudinal study.脊髓损伤后的衰老:一项30年的纵向研究。
J Spinal Cord Med. 2006;29(4):371-6. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2006.11753885.
9
Applications of methodologies of the Veterans Health Study in the VA healthcare system: conclusions and summary.退伍军人健康研究方法在退伍军人事务部医疗保健系统中的应用:结论与总结。
J Ambul Care Manage. 2006 Apr-Jun;29(2):182-8. doi: 10.1097/00004479-200604000-00011.
10
Supported employment interventions are effective for people with severe mental illness.支持性就业干预措施对重度精神疾病患者有效。
Evid Based Ment Health. 2006 Feb;9(1):22. doi: 10.1136/ebmh.9.1.22.