• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根系可塑性对土壤养分分布和浓度变化的响应演变。

Evolution of root plasticity responses to variation in soil nutrient distribution and concentration.

机构信息

Department of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, CA, USA.

出版信息

Evol Appl. 2012 Dec;5(8):850-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2012.00263.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1752-4571.2012.00263.x
PMID:23346229
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3552402/
Abstract

Root plasticity, a trait that can respond to selective pressure, may help plants forage for nutrients in heterogeneous soils. Agricultural breeding programs have artificially selected for increased yield under comparatively homogeneous soil conditions, potentially decreasing the capacity for plasticity in crop plants like barley (Hordeum vulgare). However, the effects of domestication on the evolution of root plasticity are essentially unknown. Using a split container approach, we examined the differences in root plasticity among three domestication levels of barley germplasm (wild, landrace, and cultivar) grown under different concentrations and distribution patterns of soil nutrients. Domestication level, nutrient concentration, and nutrient distribution interactively affected average root diameter; differential root allocation (within-plant plasticity) was greatest in wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum), especially under low nutrient levels. Correlations of within-plant root plasticity and plant size were most pronounced in modern cultivars under low-nutrient conditions. Barley plants invested more resources to root systems when grown in low-nutrient soils and allocated more roots to higher-nutrient locations. Root plasticity in barley is scale dependent and varies with domestication level. Although wild barley harbors a greater capacity for within-plant root plasticity than domesticated barley, cultivars exhibited the greatest capacity to translate within-plant plasticity into increased plant size.

摘要

根系可塑性是一种能够对选择压力做出响应的特性,它可以帮助植物在异质土壤中寻找养分。农业育种计划已经人为地选择了在相对同质的土壤条件下增加产量,这可能降低了像大麦(Hordeum vulgare)这样的作物植物的可塑性能力。然而,驯化对根系可塑性进化的影响在本质上是未知的。通过采用分室容器的方法,我们研究了在不同浓度和分布模式的土壤养分条件下,三种大麦种质(野生、地方品种和栽培品种)的根系可塑性之间的差异。驯化水平、养分浓度和养分分布相互作用影响平均根直径;在野生大麦(Hordeum spontaneum)中,特别是在低养分水平下,根系分配的差异(植株内可塑性)最大。在低养分条件下,现代品种中植株内根系可塑性与植株大小的相关性最为显著。当在低养分土壤中生长时,大麦植物会向根系系统投入更多的资源,并将更多的根分配到养分较高的位置。大麦的根系可塑性具有尺度依赖性,并随驯化水平而变化。尽管野生大麦比驯化大麦具有更大的植株内根系可塑性,但品种表现出将植株内可塑性转化为增加植株大小的最大能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c792/3552402/6732f86ba29a/eva0005-0850-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c792/3552402/3e22f4a87678/eva0005-0850-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c792/3552402/6732f86ba29a/eva0005-0850-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c792/3552402/3e22f4a87678/eva0005-0850-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c792/3552402/6732f86ba29a/eva0005-0850-f2.jpg

相似文献

1
Evolution of root plasticity responses to variation in soil nutrient distribution and concentration.根系可塑性对土壤养分分布和浓度变化的响应演变。
Evol Appl. 2012 Dec;5(8):850-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2012.00263.x.
2
[Response of fine roots to soil nutrient spatial heterogeneity].[细根对土壤养分空间异质性的响应]
Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao. 2004 Jun;15(6):1063-8.
3
Crop domestication disrupts intercropping benefits: A case study from barley-faba bean mixture under contrasting P inputs.作物驯化破坏间作优势:不同磷投入水平下大麦 - 蚕豆混作的案例研究
Front Plant Sci. 2023 Mar 8;14:1153237. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1153237. eCollection 2023.
4
Response-based selection of barley cultivars and legume species for complementarity: Root morphology and exudation in relation to nutrient source.基于响应的大麦品种和豆科物种选择的互补性:根系形态和分泌物与养分来源的关系。
Plant Sci. 2017 Feb;255:12-28. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.11.002. Epub 2016 Nov 9.
5
Significance of root hairs for plant performance under contrasting field conditions and water deficit.根毛在不同田间条件和水分亏缺下对植物表现的意义。
Ann Bot. 2021 Jul 28;128(1):1-16. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcaa181.
6
Haplotype structure at seven barley genes: relevance to gene pool bottlenecks, phylogeny of ear type and site of barley domestication.七个大麦基因的单倍型结构:与基因库瓶颈、穗型系统发育及大麦驯化地点的相关性
Mol Genet Genomics. 2006 Sep;276(3):230-41. doi: 10.1007/s00438-006-0136-6. Epub 2006 Jun 7.
7
"Wild barley serves as a source for biofortification of barley grains".野生大麦可作为大麦谷物生物强化的来源。
Plant Sci. 2019 Jun;283:83-94. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.12.030. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
8
A global barley panel revealing genomic signatures of breeding in modern Australian cultivars.揭示现代澳大利亚品种中育种基因组特征的全球大麦面板。
Plant J. 2021 Apr;106(2):419-434. doi: 10.1111/tpj.15173. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
9
On the origin and domestication history of Barley (Hordeum vulgare).论大麦(Hordeum vulgare)的起源与驯化历史。
Mol Biol Evol. 2000 Apr;17(4):499-510. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026330.
10
Estimating the outcrossing rate of barley landraces and wild barley populations collected from ecologically different regions of Jordan.估算从约旦生态环境各异的地区收集的大麦地方品种和野生大麦种群的异交率。
Theor Appl Genet. 2004 Aug;109(3):588-95. doi: 10.1007/s00122-004-1657-1. Epub 2004 Apr 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Validating the contributions of stem and root traits to barley lodging in western Canada.验证茎和根性状对加拿大西部大麦倒伏的影响。
Front Plant Sci. 2025 Aug 28;16:1547207. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2025.1547207. eCollection 2025.
2
The ETHYLENE RESPONSE FACTOR6-GRETCHEN HAGEN3.5 module regulates rooting and heat tolerance in Dimocarpus longan.乙烯响应因子6-葛蕾琴·哈根3.5模块调控龙眼的生根和耐热性。
Plant Physiol. 2025 Mar 1;197(3). doi: 10.1093/plphys/kiaf096.
3
Transcriptomic and Phenotypical Analysis of the Physiological Plasticity of Roots under Different Nutrient Environments and Adjacent Plant Competition.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparison of restriction fragment length polymorphisms in wild and cultivated barley.野生和栽培大麦的限制片段长度多态性比较。
Genome. 1995 Apr;38(2):298-306. doi: 10.1139/g95-037.
2
From crop domestication to super-domestication.从作物驯化到超级驯化。
Ann Bot. 2007 Nov;100(5):893-901. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcm224.
3
Amount or pattern? Grassland responses to the heterogeneity and availability of two key resources.数量还是模式?草原对两种关键资源的异质性和可利用性的响应。
不同养分环境及邻株竞争下根系生理可塑性的转录组学与表型分析
Plants (Basel). 2024 Sep 21;13(18):2641. doi: 10.3390/plants13182641.
4
Coadaptation of coexisting plants enhances productivity in an agricultural system.共存植物的共同适应提高了农业系统的生产力。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Apr 23;121(17):e2305517121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2305517121. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
5
Effects of Different Heterogeneous Nutrient Environments on the Growth and Activities of Enzymes in the Roots of Families.不同异质养分环境对豆科植物根系生长及酶活性的影响
Plants (Basel). 2023 Dec 13;12(24):4152. doi: 10.3390/plants12244152.
6
Plant Physiological Analysis to Overcome Limitations to Plant Phenotyping.克服植物表型分析局限性的植物生理分析
Plants (Basel). 2023 Nov 29;12(23):4015. doi: 10.3390/plants12234015.
7
Changes in crop trait plasticity with domestication history: Management practices matter.作物性状可塑性随驯化历史的变化:管理措施很重要。
Ecol Evol. 2023 Nov 15;13(11):e10690. doi: 10.1002/ece3.10690. eCollection 2023 Nov.
8
Plasticity of root hair and rhizosheath traits and their relationship to phosphorus uptake in sorghum.高粱根毛和根际鞘性状的可塑性及其与磷吸收的关系
Plant Direct. 2023 Aug 23;7(8):e521. doi: 10.1002/pld3.521. eCollection 2023 Aug.
9
Timing matters: Distinct effects of nitrogen and phosphorus fertilizer application timing on root system architecture responses.时机很重要:氮肥和磷肥施用时机对根系结构响应的不同影响。
Plant Environ Interact. 2021 Jul 22;2(4):194-205. doi: 10.1002/pei3.10057. eCollection 2021 Aug.
10
Uses, Botanical Characteristics, and Phenological Development of Slender Nightshade ( Mart. and Gal.).瘦茄(Mart.和Gal.)的用途、植物特征及物候发育
Plants (Basel). 2023 Apr 14;12(8):1645. doi: 10.3390/plants12081645.
Ecology. 2007 Feb;88(2):501-11. doi: 10.1890/06-0421.
4
Root foraging traits and competitive ability in heterogeneous soils.异质土壤中的根系觅食特性与竞争能力
Oecologia. 2007 Aug;153(1):145-52. doi: 10.1007/s00442-007-0706-2. Epub 2007 Apr 20.
5
Ecological consequences of phenotypic plasticity.表型可塑性的生态后果。
Trends Ecol Evol. 2005 Dec;20(12):685-92. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2005.08.002. Epub 2005 Aug 11.
6
Plastic plants and patchy soils.塑料植物和斑驳的土壤。
J Exp Bot. 2006;57(2):401-11. doi: 10.1093/jxb/eri280. Epub 2005 Sep 19.
7
Identification of quantitative trait loci that regulate Arabidopsis root system size and plasticity.调控拟南芥根系大小和可塑性的数量性状基因座的鉴定
Genetics. 2006 Jan;172(1):485-98. doi: 10.1534/genetics.105.047555. Epub 2005 Sep 12.
8
Applicability and limitations of optimal biomass allocation models: a test of two species from fertile and infertile habitats.最优生物量分配模型的适用性与局限性:来自肥沃和贫瘠栖息地的两个物种的测试
Ann Bot. 2005 Jun;95(7):1211-20. doi: 10.1093/aob/mci133. Epub 2005 Mar 24.
9
Contribution of relative growth rate to root foraging by annual and perennial grasses from California oak woodlands.加利福尼亚橡树林一年生和多年生草本植物相对生长速率对根系觅食的贡献。
Oecologia. 2003 Aug;136(3):424-30. doi: 10.1007/s00442-003-1275-7. Epub 2003 May 15.
10
Local and long-range signaling pathways regulating plant responses to nitrate.调节植物对硝酸盐响应的局部和远程信号通路。
Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2002;53:203-24. doi: 10.1146/annurev.arplant.53.100301.135256.