Lee Kyung-Jin, Kim Yong-Gun, Park Jin-Woo, Lee Jae-Mok, Suh Jo-Young
Department of Periodontology, Kyungpook National University School of Dentistry, Daegu, Korea.
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2012 Dec;42(6):231-6. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2012.42.6.231. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio on the change in marginal bone level around the implant and to determine the site-related factors influencing the relationship between the C/I ratio and periimplant marginal bone loss.
A total of 259 implants from 175 patients were evaluated at a mean follow-up of five years. Implants were divided into two groups according to their C/I ratios: ≤1, and >1. Site-related factors having an influence on the relationship between C/I ratio and periimplant marginal bone loss were analyzed according to the implant location, implant diameter, implant manufacturer, prosthesis type, and guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedure.
It was found that 1) implants with a C/I ratio below 1 exhibited greater periimplant marginal bone loss than implants with a C/I ratio more than 1, 2) site-related factors had an effect on periimplant marginal bone loss, except for the implant system used, 3) the C/I ratio was the factor having more dominant influence on periimplant marginal bone loss, compared with implant diameter, prosthesis type, implant location, and GBR procedure, 4) implants with a C/I ratio below 1 showed greater periimplant marginal bone loss than implants with a C/I ratio greater than 1 in the maxilla, but not in the mandible, 5) and periimplant marginal bone loss was more affected by the implant system than the C/I ratio.
Within the limitations of this study, implants with a higher C/I ratio exhibited less marginal bone loss than implants with a lower C/I ratio in the posterior regions. The C/I ratio was a more dominant factor affecting periimplant marginal bone loss in the maxilla than the mandible. Meanwhile, the implant system was a more dominant factor influencing periimplant marginal bone loss than the C/I ratio.
本研究旨在评估冠根比(C/I)对种植体周围边缘骨水平变化的影响,并确定影响C/I比与种植体周围边缘骨丢失关系的部位相关因素。
对175例患者的259颗种植体进行评估,平均随访5年。根据C/I比将种植体分为两组:≤1和>1。根据种植体位置、种植体直径、种植体制造商、修复体类型和引导骨再生(GBR)程序,分析影响C/I比与种植体周围边缘骨丢失关系的部位相关因素。
发现1)C/I比低于1的种植体比C/I比高于1的种植体表现出更大的种植体周围边缘骨丢失;2)除所用种植体系统外,部位相关因素对种植体周围边缘骨丢失有影响;3)与种植体直径、修复体类型、种植体位置和GBR程序相比,C/I比是对种植体周围边缘骨丢失影响更显著的因素;4)C/I比低于1的种植体在上颌比C/I比高于1的种植体表现出更大的种植体周围边缘骨丢失,但在下颌并非如此;5)种植体周围边缘骨丢失受种植体系统的影响大于C/I比。
在本研究的局限性内,C/I比更高的种植体在后牙区比C/I比更低的种植体表现出更少的边缘骨丢失。C/I比在上颌比在下颌更显著地影响种植体周围边缘骨丢失。同时,种植体系统比C/I比更显著地影响种植体周围边缘骨丢失。