Suppr超能文献

冠根比在后部区域对种植体周围边缘骨吸收的影响:一项五年回顾性研究。

Influence of crown-to-implant ratio on periimplant marginal bone loss in the posterior region: a five-year retrospective study.

作者信息

Lee Kyung-Jin, Kim Yong-Gun, Park Jin-Woo, Lee Jae-Mok, Suh Jo-Young

机构信息

Department of Periodontology, Kyungpook National University School of Dentistry, Daegu, Korea.

出版信息

J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2012 Dec;42(6):231-6. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2012.42.6.231. Epub 2012 Dec 31.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of the crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio on the change in marginal bone level around the implant and to determine the site-related factors influencing the relationship between the C/I ratio and periimplant marginal bone loss.

METHODS

A total of 259 implants from 175 patients were evaluated at a mean follow-up of five years. Implants were divided into two groups according to their C/I ratios: ≤1, and >1. Site-related factors having an influence on the relationship between C/I ratio and periimplant marginal bone loss were analyzed according to the implant location, implant diameter, implant manufacturer, prosthesis type, and guided bone regeneration (GBR) procedure.

RESULTS

It was found that 1) implants with a C/I ratio below 1 exhibited greater periimplant marginal bone loss than implants with a C/I ratio more than 1, 2) site-related factors had an effect on periimplant marginal bone loss, except for the implant system used, 3) the C/I ratio was the factor having more dominant influence on periimplant marginal bone loss, compared with implant diameter, prosthesis type, implant location, and GBR procedure, 4) implants with a C/I ratio below 1 showed greater periimplant marginal bone loss than implants with a C/I ratio greater than 1 in the maxilla, but not in the mandible, 5) and periimplant marginal bone loss was more affected by the implant system than the C/I ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of this study, implants with a higher C/I ratio exhibited less marginal bone loss than implants with a lower C/I ratio in the posterior regions. The C/I ratio was a more dominant factor affecting periimplant marginal bone loss in the maxilla than the mandible. Meanwhile, the implant system was a more dominant factor influencing periimplant marginal bone loss than the C/I ratio.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估冠根比(C/I)对种植体周围边缘骨水平变化的影响,并确定影响C/I比与种植体周围边缘骨丢失关系的部位相关因素。

方法

对175例患者的259颗种植体进行评估,平均随访5年。根据C/I比将种植体分为两组:≤1和>1。根据种植体位置、种植体直径、种植体制造商、修复体类型和引导骨再生(GBR)程序,分析影响C/I比与种植体周围边缘骨丢失关系的部位相关因素。

结果

发现1)C/I比低于1的种植体比C/I比高于1的种植体表现出更大的种植体周围边缘骨丢失;2)除所用种植体系统外,部位相关因素对种植体周围边缘骨丢失有影响;3)与种植体直径、修复体类型、种植体位置和GBR程序相比,C/I比是对种植体周围边缘骨丢失影响更显著的因素;4)C/I比低于1的种植体在上颌比C/I比高于1的种植体表现出更大的种植体周围边缘骨丢失,但在下颌并非如此;5)种植体周围边缘骨丢失受种植体系统的影响大于C/I比。

结论

在本研究的局限性内,C/I比更高的种植体在后牙区比C/I比更低的种植体表现出更少的边缘骨丢失。C/I比在上颌比在下颌更显著地影响种植体周围边缘骨丢失。同时,种植体系统比C/I比更显著地影响种植体周围边缘骨丢失。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/29a8/3543939/7a79fb8f2ed1/jpis-42-231-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Influence of crown-to-implant ratio on periimplant marginal bone loss in the posterior region: a five-year retrospective study.
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2012 Dec;42(6):231-6. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2012.42.6.231. Epub 2012 Dec 31.
2
Long-term marginal periimplant bone loss in edentulous patients.
Int J Prosthodont. 2000 Jul-Aug;13(4):295-302.
4
15-year follow-up of short dental implants placed in the partially edentulous patient: Mandible Vs maxilla.
Ann Anat. 2019 Mar;222:88-93. doi: 10.1016/j.aanat.2018.11.003. Epub 2018 Nov 15.
6
Factors influencing marginal bone loss at a hydrophilic implant design placed with or without GBR procedures: A 5-year retrospective study.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2019 Oct;21(5):817-826. doi: 10.1111/cid.12826. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
8
Immediate loading of tapered implants placed in postextraction sockets: retrospective analysis of the 5-year clinical outcome.
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012 Aug;14(4):565-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2010.00297.x. Epub 2010 Jul 17.
10
The effects of off-axial loading on periimplant marginal bone loss in a single implant.
J Prosthet Dent. 2014 Sep;112(3):501-7. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Apr 12.

引用本文的文献

1
A Retrospective Analysis of the Influence of Crown-to-Implant Ratio on Marginal Bone Loss.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Dec;16(Suppl 4):S3880-S3882. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1345_24. Epub 2024 Dec 27.
2
Influence of Crown Height and Width on Marginal Bone Loss and Long-Term Stability of Dental Implants: A Systematic Review.
Cureus. 2024 Jul 22;16(7):e65109. doi: 10.7759/cureus.65109. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
Clinical evaluation of 3.0-mm narrow-diameter implants: a retrospective study with up to 5 years of observation.
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2024 Feb;54(1):44-52. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2300820041. Epub 2023 May 30.
6
Effect of crown-to-implant ratio and crown height space on marginal bone stress: a finite element analysis.
Int J Implant Dent. 2021 Sep 1;7(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s40729-021-00368-1.
8
Effect of crown-to-implant ratio on the marginal bone level changes and implant survival - A systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2020 Oct-Dec;10(4):705-713. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2020.10.002. Epub 2020 Oct 4.
9
Guided bone regeneration using K-incision technique.
J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2018 Jun 30;48(3):193-200. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2018.48.3.193. eCollection 2018 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of increased crown-to-implant ratio on single-tooth locking-taper implants.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010 Jul-Aug;25(4):729-43.
2
Effects of different implant surfaces and designs on marginal bone-level alterations: a review.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009 Sep;20 Suppl 4:207-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2009.01783.x.
4
Crown-to-implant ratios of single tooth implant-supported restorations.
J Prosthet Dent. 2007 Jul;98(1):1-5. doi: 10.1016/S0022-3913(07)60031-6.
5
Biomechanical consequences of progressive marginal bone loss around oral implants: a finite element stress analysis.
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2006 Jul;44(7):527-35. doi: 10.1007/s11517-006-0072-y. Epub 2006 Jun 10.
8
The prosthodontic concept of crown-to-root ratio: a review of the literature.
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Jun;93(6):559-62. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.03.006.
10
Reliability of some clinical parameters of evaluation in implant dentistry.
J Oral Rehabil. 2000 Mar;27(3):211-6. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00524.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验