Damiano R J, Cox J L, Lowe J E, Santamore W P
Department of Surgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.
Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn. 1990 Apr;19(4):269-78. doi: 10.1002/ccd.1810190411.
Massive destruction of the right ventricular free wall has been shown to cause only mild hemodynamic alterations. Further, the derivative of right ventricular (RV) pressure (P) is broad or double peaked, with one peak occurring coincidentally with peak left ventricular (LV) dP/dt. Both observations suggest a direct LV assistance to RV function. Since the ventricles contract nearly simultaneously, the relative contribution of LV to RV pump function has been difficult to determine. This LV assistance was quantified in six canine experiments using a unique electrically isolated RV preparation. While on total cardiopulmonary bypass, the RV free wall was electrically isolated from the remainder of the heart. This preparation allowed for wide variations in the timing interval between RV and LV contractions. Double-peaked waveforms for RVP and pulmonary flow (RVF) occurred over a wide range (0 to 300 ms) of pacing intervals between the RV and LV. One derivative peak always followed RV contraction for RVP and RVF (r = 0.971 +/- .011, P less than 0.01: r = 0.972 +/- .012, p less than 0.01; respectively). The second derivative peak was unrelated to the RA-RV pacing interval (r = 0.297 +/- .191, P greater than 0.5 RVP; 4 = 0.237 +/- .278, P greater than 0.5 RVF), but corresponded to the maximal LVP rise. Additionally, the magnitude of the two derivative peaks was similar when the ventricles contracted synchronously. When RV contraction preceded or followed LV contraction, the derivative peak associated with LV contraction was significantly greater (P less than 0.05, range 2.1 +/- 0.6 to 6.7 +/- 1.6 for RVP; P less than 0.05 range 1.9 +/- 0.4 to 6.7 +/- 1.5 for RVF) than the derivative associated with RV contraction. These data demonstrate a normally present, large LV assistance to RV contraction and may help to explain the RV response to myocardial infarction.
右心室游离壁的大规模破坏已被证明仅引起轻微的血流动力学改变。此外,右心室(RV)压力(P)的导数是宽峰或双峰的,其中一个峰与左心室(LV)dP/dt的峰值同时出现。这两个观察结果都表明左心室对右心室功能有直接的辅助作用。由于心室几乎同时收缩,左心室对右心室泵功能的相对贡献一直难以确定。在六个犬类实验中,使用一种独特的电隔离右心室制备方法对这种左心室辅助作用进行了量化。在完全体外循环期间,右心室游离壁与心脏的其余部分进行电隔离。这种制备方法允许右心室和左心室收缩之间的时间间隔有很大变化。在右心室和左心室之间的起搏间隔的很宽范围(0至300毫秒)内,右心室压力(RVP)和肺血流量(RVF)出现了双峰波形。对于RVP和RVF,一个导数峰总是跟随右心室收缩(r = 0.971 +/- 0.011,P < 0.01;r = 0.972 +/- 0.012,p < 0.01;分别)。第二个导数峰与右心房 - 右心室起搏间隔无关(r = 0.297 +/- 0.191,P > 0.5 RVP;r = 0.237 +/- 0.278,P > 0.5 RVF),但与左心室压力(LVP)的最大上升相对应。此外,当心室同步收缩时,两个导数峰的大小相似。当右心室收缩先于或后于左心室收缩时,与左心室收缩相关的导数峰明显大于(P < 0.05,RVP的范围为2.1 +/- 0.6至6.7 +/- 1.6;RVF的P < 0.05范围为1.9 +/- 0.4至6.7 +/- 1.5)与右心室收缩相关的导数。这些数据证明了左心室对右心室收缩通常存在的、较大的辅助作用,并可能有助于解释右心室对心肌梗死的反应。