• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

甘露醇干粉激发试验对儿童呼出气一氧化氮的影响。

Effect of mannitol dry powder challenge on exhaled nitric oxide in children.

机构信息

Department of Paediatric Pulmonology & Allergology, Children's Hospital, St. Gallen, Switzerland.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054521. Epub 2013 Jan 18.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0054521
PMID:23349918
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3548778/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO), a non-invasive marker of eosinophilic airway inflammation, is increasingly used for diagnostic and therapeutic decisions in adult and paediatric asthma. Standardized guidelines for the measurement of FENO recommend performing FENO measurements before rather than after bronchial provocation tests.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether FENO levels decrease after a Mannitol dry powder (MDP) challenge in a clinical setting, and whether the extent of the decrease is influenced by number of MDP manoeuvres, baseline FENO, atopy and doctor diagnosed asthma.

METHODS

Children aged 6-16 years, referred for possible reactive airway disease to a respiratory outpatient clinic, performed an MDP challenge (Aridol®, Pharmaxis, Australia). FENO was measured in doublets immediately before and after the challenge test using the portable NIOX MINO® device (Aerocrine, Stockholm, Sweden). We analysed the data using Kruskal-Wallis rank tests, Wilcoxon signed rank tests and multivariable linear regressions.

RESULTS

One hundred and seven children completed both tests (mean±SD age 11.5±2.8 years). Overall, median (interquartile range) FENO decreased slightly by -2.5 ppb (-7.0, -0.5), from 18.5 ppb (10.5, 45.5) before the MDP challenge to 16.5 ppb thereafter (8.5, 40.5; p<0.001). In all participants, the change in FENO was smaller than one standard deviation of the baseline mean. The % fall in FENO was smaller in children with less MDP manoeuvres (e.g. higher bronchial responsiveness; p = 0.08) but was not influenced by levels of baseline FENO (p = 0.68), atopy (p = 0.84) or doctor diagnosed asthma (p = 0.93).

CONCLUSION

MDP challenge test influences FENO values but differences are small and clinically barely relevant.

摘要

背景

呼出气一氧化氮(FENO)分数,一种非侵袭性的气道嗜酸性粒细胞炎症标志物,越来越多地用于成人和儿童哮喘的诊断和治疗决策。用于测量 FENO 的标准化指南建议在进行支气管激发试验之前而不是之后进行 FENO 测量。

目的

研究在临床环境中,甘露糖醇干粉(MDP)激发试验后 FENO 是否会降低,以及降低的程度是否受 MDP 操作次数、基线 FENO、特应性和医生诊断的哮喘的影响。

方法

年龄在 6-16 岁的儿童,因可能患有反应性气道疾病而被转介到呼吸门诊,进行 MDP 激发试验(Aridol®,Pharmaxis,澳大利亚)。使用便携式 NIOX MINO®设备(Aerocrine,斯德哥尔摩,瑞典)在激发试验前后立即进行 FENO 的双份测量。我们使用 Kruskal-Wallis 秩检验、Wilcoxon 符号秩检验和多变量线性回归分析数据。

结果

107 名儿童完成了两项测试(平均年龄±标准差为 11.5±2.8 岁)。总体而言,中位(四分位间距)FENO 略有下降,从 MDP 激发前的 18.5 ppb(10.5,45.5)下降至 16.5 ppb(8.5,40.5)(p<0.001)。在所有参与者中,FENO 的变化小于基线平均值的一个标准差。FENO 下降的百分比在进行较少 MDP 操作的儿童中较小(例如支气管高反应性;p = 0.08),但不受基线 FENO 水平(p = 0.68)、特应性(p = 0.84)或医生诊断的哮喘(p = 0.93)的影响。

结论

MDP 激发试验会影响 FENO 值,但差异较小,临床上几乎无相关性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d601/3548778/2df5145582f1/pone.0054521.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d601/3548778/2df5145582f1/pone.0054521.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d601/3548778/2df5145582f1/pone.0054521.g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of mannitol dry powder challenge on exhaled nitric oxide in children.甘露醇干粉激发试验对儿童呼出气一氧化氮的影响。
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54521. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054521. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
2
Airway hyperresponsiveness to mannitol and methacholine and exhaled nitric oxide in children with asthma.哮喘患儿对甘露醇和乙酰甲胆碱的气道高反应性及呼出一氧化氮
J Asthma. 2017 Aug;54(6):644-651. doi: 10.1080/02770903.2016.1255751. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
3
Evaluation of bronchial hyperreactivity with mannitol dry powder challenge test in a paediatric population with intermittent allergic asthma or allergic rhinitis.评价间歇性变应性哮喘或变应性鼻炎患儿应用甘露醇干粉激发试验的支气管高反应性。
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2011 Oct-Dec;24(4):1069-74. doi: 10.1177/039463201102400424.
4
Concordance between bronchial hyperresponsiveness, fractional exhaled nitric oxide, and asthma control in children.儿童支气管高反应性、呼出一氧化氮分数与哮喘控制之间的一致性
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2016 Oct;51(10):1004-1009. doi: 10.1002/ppul.23426. Epub 2016 Apr 13.
5
Combining the Mannitol Test and FeNO in the Assessment of Poorly Controlled Asthma.联合使用甘露醇试验和呼出气一氧化氮检测评估控制不佳的哮喘。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2015 Jul-Aug;3(4):553-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2015.02.005. Epub 2015 Mar 29.
6
FENO and AHR mannitol in patients referred to an out-of-hospital asthma clinic: a real-life study.转诊至院外哮喘诊所患者的呼出气一氧化氮(FENO)和芳香烃受体(AHR)与甘露醇:一项真实世界研究
J Asthma. 2014 May;51(4):411-6. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2013.878953. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
7
Measurement of exhaled nitric oxide concentration in asthma: a systematic review and economic evaluation of NIOX MINO, NIOX VERO and NObreath.哮喘患者呼出一氧化氮浓度的测量:NIOX MINO、NIOX VERO和NObreath的系统评价与经济学评估
Health Technol Assess. 2015 Oct;19(82):1-330. doi: 10.3310/hta19820.
8
[Effects and significance of methacholine bronchial provocation tests and salbutamol bronchial dilation test on measurements of fractional exhaled nitric oxide in patients with asthma].[乙酰甲胆碱支气管激发试验和沙丁胺醇支气管舒张试验对哮喘患者呼出气一氧化氮分数测定的影响及意义]
Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2016 Mar;39(3):189-92. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1001-0939.2016.03.010.
9
Diagnostic value and influencing factors of fractional exhaled nitric oxide in suspected asthma patients.呼出一氧化氮分数在疑似哮喘患者中的诊断价值及影响因素
Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015 May 1;8(5):5570-6. eCollection 2015.
10
Usefulness of exhaled nitric oxide for diagnosing asthma.呼出一氧化氮在哮喘诊断中的应用价值。
J Asthma. 2010 Sep;47(7):817-21. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2010.491147.

引用本文的文献

1
Bronchial hyperresponsiveness to mannitol, airway inflammation and Asthma Control Test in atopic asthmatic children.特应性哮喘儿童对甘露醇的支气管高反应性、气道炎症及哮喘控制测试
Arch Med Sci. 2016 Feb 1;12(1):137-44. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2016.57589. Epub 2016 Feb 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of bronchial hyperreactivity with mannitol dry powder challenge test in a paediatric population with intermittent allergic asthma or allergic rhinitis.评价间歇性变应性哮喘或变应性鼻炎患儿应用甘露醇干粉激发试验的支气管高反应性。
Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2011 Oct-Dec;24(4):1069-74. doi: 10.1177/039463201102400424.
2
Mannitol dry powder challenge in comparison with exercise testing in children.甘露醇干粉激发试验与运动试验在儿童中的比较。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2011 Sep;46(9):842-8. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21453. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
3
Comparability of a hand-held nitric oxide analyser with online and offline chemiluminescence-based nitric oxide measurement.
手持式一氧化氮分析仪与在线和离线化学发光法一氧化氮测量的可比性。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2009 Nov;20(7):679-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2009.00853.x. Epub 2009 Aug 13.
4
Mannitol and exercise challenge tests in asthmatic children.哮喘儿童的甘露醇和运动激发试验
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2009 Jul;44(7):655-61. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21034.
5
British Guideline on the Management of Asthma.英国哮喘管理指南。
Thorax. 2008 May;63 Suppl 4:iv1-121. doi: 10.1136/thx.2008.097741.
6
Portable exhaled nitric oxide measurement: Comparison with the "gold standard" technique.便携式呼出一氧化氮测量:与“金标准”技术的比较。
Chest. 2007 Feb;131(2):410-4. doi: 10.1378/chest.06-1335.
7
Exhaled nitric oxide measurements: clinical application and interpretation.呼出一氧化氮测量:临床应用与解读
Thorax. 2006 Sep;61(9):817-27. doi: 10.1136/thx.2005.056093.
8
Reduced exhaled nitric oxide in children after testing of maximal expiratory pressures.最大呼气压力测试后儿童呼出一氧化氮减少。
Pediatr Pulmonol. 2006 Feb;41(2):141-5. doi: 10.1002/ppul.20358.
9
The safety and efficacy of inhaled dry powder mannitol as a bronchial provocation test for airway hyperresponsiveness: a phase 3 comparison study with hypertonic (4.5%) saline.吸入性干粉甘露醇作为气道高反应性支气管激发试验的安全性和有效性:与高渗(4.5%)盐水的3期对比研究。
Respir Res. 2005 Dec 9;6(1):144. doi: 10.1186/1465-9921-6-144.
10
The effect of spirometry and exercise on exhaled nitric oxide in asthmatic children.肺活量测定法和运动对哮喘儿童呼出一氧化氮的影响。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2005 May;16(3):243-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-3038.2005.00255.x.