Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054764. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
A key factor that contributes to the regenerative ability of regeneration-competent animals such as the salamander is their use of innate positional cues that guide the regeneration process. The limbs of mammals has severe regenerative limitations, however the distal most portion of the terminal phalange is regeneration competent. This regenerative ability of the adult mouse digit is level dependent: amputation through the distal half of the terminal phalanx (P3) leads to successful regeneration, whereas amputation through a more proximal location, e.g. the subterminal phalangeal element (P2), fails to regenerate. Do the connective tissue cells of the mammalian digit play a role similar to that of the salamander limb in controlling the regenerative response? To begin to address this question, we isolated and cultured cells of the connective tissue surrounding the phalangeal bones of regeneration competent (P3) and incompetent (P2) levels. Despite their close proximity and localization, these cells show very distinctive profiles when characterized in vitro and in vivo. In vitro studies comparing their proliferation and position-specific interactions reveal that cells isolated from the P3 and P2 are both capable of organizing and differentiating epithelial progenitors, but with different outcomes. The difference in interactions are further characterized with three-dimension cultures, in which P3 regenerative cells are shown to lack a contractile response that is seen in other fibroblast cultures, including the P2 cultures. In in vivo engraftment studies, the difference between these two cell lines is made more apparent. While both P2 and P3 cells participated in the regeneration of the terminal phalanx, their survival and proliferative indices were distinct, thus suggesting a key difference in their ability to interact within a regeneration permissive environment. These studies are the first to demonstrate distinct positional characteristics of connective tissue cells that are associated with their regenerative capabilities.
对于再生能力强的动物(如蝾螈)来说,一个关键因素是它们利用先天的位置线索来指导再生过程。然而,哺乳动物的四肢再生能力非常有限,但其指端末节的最远端部分具有再生能力。成年小鼠趾的这种再生能力取决于其所处的位置:在远端半指端(P3)处截肢可导致成功再生,而在更靠近近端的位置(如次级指骨元素(P2))截肢则无法再生。哺乳动物趾的结缔组织细胞是否在控制再生反应方面发挥了类似于蝾螈肢体的作用?为了开始解决这个问题,我们分离并培养了具有再生能力(P3)和无再生能力(P2)水平的指端骨周围的结缔组织细胞。尽管它们位置相近且定位相似,但这些细胞在体外和体内表现出非常不同的特征。体外研究比较了它们的增殖和位置特异性相互作用,发现从 P3 和 P2 分离的细胞都能够组织和分化上皮祖细胞,但结果不同。差异的相互作用进一步通过三维培养进行了表征,其中 P3 再生细胞缺乏在其他成纤维细胞培养物(包括 P2 培养物)中观察到的收缩反应。在体内移植研究中,这两种细胞系之间的差异更加明显。虽然 P2 和 P3 细胞都参与了末端指骨的再生,但它们的存活和增殖指数是不同的,这表明它们在再生允许环境中相互作用的能力存在关键差异。这些研究首次证明了与它们的再生能力相关的结缔组织细胞具有独特的位置特征。