• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

启动时钟:通过时间定义钝性脾损伤的非手术治疗。

Starting the clock: defining nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury by time.

机构信息

Department of Trauma, Allegheny General Hospital, 320 East North Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, USA.

出版信息

Am J Surg. 2013 Mar;205(3):298-301. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.10.022. Epub 2013 Jan 22.

DOI:10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.10.022
PMID:23351507
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus when the designation of nonoperative management (NOM) for splenic injury (BSI) should start. We evaluated NOM success rates based on different time points after admission.

METHODS

The National Trauma Data Bank was evaluated for BSI for the year 2008. Observations were evaluated by facility, the time to splenectomy, and the volume of BSI admissions.

RESULTS

Of 15,732 BSIs identified, the overall splenectomy salvage rate was 81%. After the 5th hour, the NOM success rate was 95%. Multivariable analysis revealed that higher BSI grades, level 2 centers and community hospitals, and age ≥55 were associated with failed NOM.

CONCLUSIONS

The grade of injury is an important predictor for failure of NOM. If a 5% failure rate is to be considered a benchmark, then the 5-hour time point after admission should be used for the calculation of NOM success rates.

摘要

背景

对于脾损伤(BSI)何时开始非手术治疗(NOM)尚无共识。我们根据入院后不同时间点评估 NOM 的成功率。

方法

评估了国家创伤数据库 2008 年的 BSI。通过医疗机构、脾切除术时间和 BSI 入院量来评估观察结果。

结果

在确定的 15732 例 BSI 中,整体脾切除术保脾率为 81%。第 5 小时后,NOM 的成功率为 95%。多变量分析显示,较高的 BSI 分级、2 级中心和社区医院以及年龄≥55 岁与 NOM 失败相关。

结论

损伤程度是 NOM 失败的重要预测因素。如果将 5%的失败率视为基准,则应在入院后 5 小时计算 NOM 成功率。

相似文献

1
Starting the clock: defining nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury by time.启动时钟:通过时间定义钝性脾损伤的非手术治疗。
Am J Surg. 2013 Mar;205(3):298-301. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2012.10.022. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
2
Liver cirrhosis: an unfavorable factor for nonoperative management of blunt splenic injury.肝硬化:钝性脾损伤非手术治疗的不利因素。
J Trauma. 2003 Jun;54(6):1131-6; discussion 1136. doi: 10.1097/01.TA.0000066123.32997.BB.
3
Trauma centers with higher rates of angiography have a lesser incidence of splenectomy in the management of blunt splenic injury.血管造影术使用率较高的创伤中心在钝性脾损伤处理中脾切除术的发生率较低。
Surgery. 2015 Oct;158(4):1020-4; discussion 1024-6. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.05.025. Epub 2015 Aug 14.
4
Blunt splenic injuries: have we watched long enough?钝性脾损伤:我们观察得够久了吗?
J Trauma. 2008 Mar;64(3):656-63; discussion 663-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181650fb4.
5
Trauma center variation in splenic artery embolization and spleen salvage: a multicenter analysis.创伤中心脾动脉栓塞和保脾术的差异:一项多中心分析。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1):69-74; discussion 74-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182988b3b.
6
Does splenic embolization and grade of splenic injury impact nonoperative management in patients sustaining blunt splenic trauma?脾脏栓塞和脾脏损伤分级对钝性脾外伤患者的非手术治疗有影响吗?
Am Surg. 2011 Feb;77(2):215-20.
7
Variation in the use of urgent splenectomy after blunt splenic injury in adults.成人钝性脾损伤后急诊脾切除术使用情况的差异。
J Trauma. 2011 Nov;71(5):1333-9. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318224d0e4.
8
Blunt assault is associated with failure of nonoperative management of the spleen independent of organ injury grade and despite lower overall injury severity.钝性攻击与脾脏非手术治疗失败相关,这与器官损伤分级无关,且尽管总体损伤严重程度较低。
J Trauma. 2009 Mar;66(3):630-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3181991aed.
9
Subcapsular hematoma in blunt splenic injury: A significant predictor of failure of nonoperative management.钝性脾损伤中的包膜下血肿:非手术治疗失败的重要预测指标。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015 Dec;79(6):957-9; discussion 959-60. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000000854.
10
Nonoperative management of blunt splenic trauma in the elderly: does age play a role?老年人钝性脾外伤的非手术治疗:年龄起作用吗?
Am Surg. 2007 Jun;73(6):585-9; discussion 590.

引用本文的文献

1
Variation in the utilization of angioembolization for splenic injury in hospitals: a nationwide cross-sectional study in Japan.日本医院间脾损伤血管栓塞术使用情况的差异:一项全国性横断面研究
Acute Med Surg. 2023 Apr 12;10(1):e837. doi: 10.1002/ams2.837. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
2
Blunt splenic trauma: Analysis of predictors and risk factors affecting the non-operative management failure rate.钝性脾损伤:影响非手术治疗失败率的预测因素和危险因素分析。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2022 Oct;28(10):1428-1436. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2022.95476.
3
Damage control surgery for splenic trauma: "preserve an organ - preserve a life".
创伤性脾破裂的损伤控制性手术:“保留一个器官——挽救一条生命”。
Colomb Med (Cali). 2021 May 7;52(2):e4084794. doi: 10.25100/cm.v52i2.4794.
4
Outcomes Following Blunt Traumatic Splenic Injury Treated with Conservative or Operative Management.钝性创伤性脾损伤采用保守或手术治疗后的结果
Kans J Med. 2019 Aug 21;12(3):83-88. eCollection 2019 Aug.
5
Splenectomy proportions are still high in low-grade traumatic splenic injury.在低度外伤性脾损伤中,脾切除术的比例仍然很高。
Turk J Surg. 2018 Apr 30;34(2):106-110. doi: 10.5152/turkjsurg.2018.3735. eCollection 2018.
6
Splenic trauma: WSES classification and guidelines for adult and pediatric patients.脾脏创伤:WSES 分类和成人及儿童患者治疗指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2017 Aug 18;12:40. doi: 10.1186/s13017-017-0151-4. eCollection 2017.
7
Observation Versus Embolization in Patients with Blunt Splenic Injury After Trauma: A Propensity Score Analysis.创伤后钝性脾损伤患者观察与栓塞治疗的倾向评分分析
World J Surg. 2016 May;40(5):1264-71. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3387-8.