Tennessee Retina, Nashville, Tennessee 37203, USA.
Ophthalmology. 2013 May;120(5):1046-56. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.10.014. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
To evaluate the 12-month efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab 0.5 mg and 2.0 mg administered monthly and on an as-needed (PRN) basis in treatment-naïve patients with subfoveal neovascular age-related macular degeneration (wet AMD).
A 24-month, phase III, randomized, multicenter, double-masked, dose-response study.
Patients aged ≥ 50 years with subfoveal wet AMD.
Patients (n = 1098) were randomized to receive ranibizumab 0.5 mg or 2.0 mg intravitreal injections administered monthly or on a PRN basis after 3 monthly loading doses.
The primary efficacy end point was the mean change from baseline in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) at month 12. Key secondary end points included the mean number of ranibizumab injections, the mean change from baseline in central foveal thickness (CFT) over time, and the proportion of patients who gained ≥ 15 letters of BCVA. Unless otherwise specified, end point analyses were performed using the last-observation-carried-forward method to impute missing data.
At month 12, the mean change from baseline in BCVA for the 4 groups was +10.1 letters (0.5 mg monthly), +8.2 letters (0.5 mg PRN), +9.2 letters (2.0 mg monthly), and +8.6 letters (2.0 mg PRN). The proportion of patients who gained ≥ 15 letters from baseline at month 12 in the 4 groups was 34.5%, 30.2%, 36.1%, and 33.0%, respectively. The mean change from baseline in CFT at month 12 in the 4 groups was -172.0 μm, -161.2 μm, -163.3 μm, and -172.4 μm, respectively. The mean number of injections was 7.7 and 6.9 for the 0.5-mg PRN and 2.0-mg PRN groups, respectively. Ocular and systemic safety profiles were consistent with previous ranibizumab trials in AMD and comparable between groups.
At month 12, the ranibizumab 2.0 mg monthly group did not meet the prespecified superiority comparison and the ranibizumab 0.5 mg and 2.0 mg PRN groups did not meet the prespecified noninferiority (NI) comparison. However, all treatment groups demonstrated clinically meaningful visual improvement (+8.2 to +10.1 letters) and improved anatomic outcomes, with the PRN groups requiring approximately 4 fewer injections (6.9-7.7) than the monthly groups (11.2-11.3). No new safety events were observed despite a 4-fold dose escalation in the study. The pHase III, double-masked, multicenter, randomized, Active treatment-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of 0.5 mg and 2.0 mg Ranibizumab administered monthly or on an as-needed Basis (PRN) in patients with subfoveal neOvasculaR age-related macular degeneration (HARBOR) study confirmed that ranibizumab 0.5 mg dosed monthly provides optimum results in patients with wet AMD.
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
评估玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗每月和按需(PRN)治疗初治性湿性年龄相关性黄斑变性(湿性 AMD)患者的 12 个月疗效和安全性。
一项为期 24 个月的、3 期、随机、多中心、双盲、剂量反应研究。
年龄≥50 岁的、有脉络膜新生血管的湿性 AMD 患者。
患者(n = 1098)随机接受玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗 0.5mg 或 2.0mg,每月或 3 个负荷剂量后每月或按需(PRN)注射。
主要疗效终点为治疗 12 个月时最佳矫正视力(BCVA)的平均变化。主要次要终点包括雷珠单抗的平均注射次数、中央视网膜厚度(CFT)的平均变化随时间的变化以及视力提高≥15 个字母的患者比例。除非另有说明,否则使用末次观察结转法(LOCF)进行缺失数据插补。
治疗 12 个月时,4 组患者的 BCVA 平均变化分别为+10.1 个字母(0.5mg 每月)、+8.2 个字母(0.5mg PRN)、+9.2 个字母(2.0mg 每月)和+8.6 个字母(2.0mg PRN)。4 组患者在第 12 个月时,从基线开始视力提高≥15 个字母的比例分别为 34.5%、30.2%、36.1%和 33.0%。4 组患者第 12 个月时 CFT 的平均变化分别为-172.0μm、-161.2μm、-163.3μm 和-172.4μm。0.5mg PRN 和 2.0mg PRN 组的平均注射次数分别为 7.7 次和 6.9 次。AMD 雷珠单抗试验中的眼部和全身安全性概况与先前的试验一致,并且组间相似。
在第 12 个月时,雷珠单抗 2.0mg 每月组未达到预设的优势比较,雷珠单抗 0.5mg 和 2.0mg PRN 组未达到预设的非劣效性(NI)比较。然而,所有治疗组均显示出有临床意义的视力改善(+8.2 至+10.1 个字母)和改善的解剖学结果,PRN 组的注射次数比每月组(11.2-11.3)少约 4 次(6.9-7.7)。尽管研究中雷珠单抗的剂量增加了 4 倍,但没有观察到新的安全事件。该研究证实,每月注射 0.5mg 雷珠单抗是湿性 AMD 患者的最佳治疗选择。
参考文献后可能有专有或商业披露。