Wilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Ophthalmology. 2012 Sep;119(9):1867-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.03.043. Epub 2012 Jun 8.
To evaluate the efficacy of different dosing paradigms of PF-04523655 (PF) versus ranibizumab (comparator) in subjects with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (AMD).
Multicenter, open-label, prospective, randomized, comparator-controlled exploratory study.
A total of 151 patients with subfoveal choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to neovascular AMD who were naive to AMD therapy.
In this phase 2 study, patients were randomized to 1 of 5 treatment groups with equal ratio. All groups received ranibizumab 0.5 mg at baseline and (a) PF 1 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) from week 4 to week 12; (b) PF 3 mg Q4W from week 4 to week 12; (c) PF 3 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) from week 4 to week 12; (d) PF 1 mg + ranibizumab (combination) Q4W from baseline to week 12; and (e) ranibizumab Q4W to week 12. All study treatments were given as intravitreal injections.
The primary end point was the mean change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline at week 16; secondary end points included the percentage of patients gaining ≥ 10 and ≥ 15 letters in BCVA and mean change in retinal central subfield thickness, lesion thickness, and CNV area.
At week 16, the PF 1 mg + ranibizumab combination group achieved numerically greater improvement in mean BCVA from baseline (9.5 letters) than the ranibizumab group (6.8 letters). The difference was not statistically significant. The BCVA improvement in the PF monotherapy groups was less than in the ranibizumab group. Similar trends were observed in the percentage of patients who gained ≥ 10 and ≥ 15 letters. From baseline to week 16 (last observed carried forward), the combination and ranibizumab groups had similar mean reductions in central subfield retinal thickness and total CNV area, which were greater than in all PF monotherapy groups. There were no clinically meaningful differences in reduction of lesion thickness among treatment groups.
In this early, underpowered study evaluating treatments for neovascular AMD, the combination of PF with ranibizumab led to an average gain in BCVA that was more than with ranibizumab monotherapy. No safety concerns were identified.
评估 PF-04523655(PF)与雷珠单抗(对照)不同给药方案在新生血管性年龄相关性黄斑变性(AMD)患者中的疗效。
多中心、开放性、前瞻性、随机、对照探索性研究。
共 151 例接受抗 VEGF 治疗的初治患者,患者均存在继发于新生血管性 AMD 的黄斑中心凹下脉络膜新生血管(CNV)。
在这项 2 期研究中,患者按 1:1 的比例随机分配至 5 个治疗组中的 1 个。所有患者均在基线时接受雷珠单抗 0.5mg,此后(a)第 4 周至第 12 周,PF 1mg,每 4 周 1 次(Q4W);(b)第 4 周至第 12 周,PF 3mg,Q4W;(c)第 4 周至第 12 周,PF 3mg,每 2 周 1 次(Q2W);(d)第 4 周至第 12 周,PF 1mg+雷珠单抗(联合),Q4W;(e)仅雷珠单抗,Q4W 至第 12 周。所有研究治疗均为玻璃体内注射。
主要终点为第 16 周时最佳矫正视力(BCVA)自基线的平均变化;次要终点包括患者 BCVA 提高≥10 个和≥15 个字母的比例、视网膜中心凹下区厚度、病灶厚度和 CNV 面积的平均变化。
第 16 周时,PF 1mg+雷珠单抗联合组较雷珠单抗组(9.5 个字母)有更大的 BCVA 自基线的改善(9.5 个字母),但差异无统计学意义。PF 单药治疗组的 BCVA 改善较雷珠单抗组小。在提高≥10 个和≥15 个字母的患者比例方面,也观察到了类似的趋势。自基线至第 16 周(末次观察值结转),联合组和雷珠单抗组的中央视网膜下厚度和总 CNV 面积的平均下降相似,且均大于所有 PF 单药治疗组。各组间病灶厚度的下降无临床意义的差异。
在这项评估新生血管性 AMD 治疗方法的早期、小样本研究中,PF 联合雷珠单抗治疗导致的 BCVA 平均提高优于雷珠单抗单药治疗。未发现安全性问题。