Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology, DISIM, University Hospitals of Geneva, Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland.
Neuroradiology. 2013 May;55(5):595-602. doi: 10.1007/s00234-013-1141-1. Epub 2013 Jan 25.
This study aims to demonstrate the added value of a 3D fat-saturated (FS) T1 sampling perfection with application-optimised contrast using different flip angle evolutions (SPACE) sequence compared to 2D FS T1 spin echo (SE) for the diagnosis of cervical artery dissection.
Thirty-one patients were prospectively evaluated on a 1.5-T MR system for a clinical suspicion of acute or subacute cervical artery dissection with 3D T1 SPACE sequence. In 23 cases, the axial 2D FS T1 SE sequence was also used; only these cases were subsequently analysed. Two neuroradiologists independently and blindly assessed the 2D and 3D T1 sequences. The presence of recent dissection (defined as a T1 hyperintensity in the vessel wall) and the quality of fat suppression were assessed. The final diagnosis was established in consensus, after reviewing all the imaging and clinical data.
Overall sensitivity and specificity were 0.929 and 1 for axial T1 SE, and 0.965 and 0.945 for T1 SPACE (P > 0.05), respectively. The two readers had excellent agreement for both sequences (k = 1 and 0.8175 for T1 SE and T1 SPACE, respectively; P > 0.05). The quality of the fat saturation was similar. Very good fat saturation was obtained in the upper neck. Multiplanar reconstructions were very useful in tortuous regions, such as the atlas loop of the vertebral artery or the carotid petrous entry. 3D T1 SPACE sequence has a shorter acquisition time (3 min 25 s versus 5 min 32 s for one T1 SE sequence) and a larger coverage area.
3D T1 SPACE sequence offers similar information with its 2D counterpart, in a shorter acquisition time and larger coverage area.
本研究旨在展示与 2D 轴位 FS T1 自旋回波(SE)序列相比,3D 脂肪饱和(FS)T1 采样完美应用优化对比(SPACE)序列在诊断颈内动脉夹层中的附加价值。
在 1.5T MR 系统上对 31 例有急性或亚急性颈内动脉夹层临床怀疑的患者进行前瞻性评估,采用 3D T1 SPACE 序列。在 23 例患者中,还使用了轴向 2D FS T1 SE 序列;只有这些病例随后进行了分析。两位神经放射科医生独立且盲法评估了 2D 和 3D T1 序列。评估了最近的夹层(定义为血管壁 T1 高信号)的存在和脂肪抑制的质量。在回顾所有影像学和临床数据后,通过共识确定最终诊断。
轴向 T1 SE 的总体敏感性和特异性分别为 0.929 和 1,T1 SPACE 分别为 0.965 和 0.945(P>0.05)。对于两种序列,两位读者的一致性均非常好(T1 SE 和 T1 SPACE 的 k 值分别为 1 和 0.8175;P>0.05)。脂肪抑制质量相似。上颈部获得了非常好的脂肪抑制。多平面重建在椎动脉 atlas 环或颈动脉岩骨入口等迂曲部位非常有用。3D T1 SPACE 序列的采集时间更短(3 分 25 秒,而 1 个 T1 SE 序列为 5 分 32 秒),覆盖范围更大。
3D T1 SPACE 序列在更短的采集时间和更大的覆盖范围内提供了与 2D 序列相似的信息。