• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药品标签中的安全信息:美国、英国和日本的比较。

Safety information in drug labeling: a comparison of the USA, the UK, and Japan.

机构信息

Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan.

出版信息

Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Mar;22(3):306-18. doi: 10.1002/pds.3408. Epub 2013 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1002/pds.3408
PMID:23355452
Abstract

PURPOSE

Despite globalization of drug approvals, there is a disparity in drug safety regulations among the USA, Europe, and Japan. We sought to determine differences in safety information on drug labels among the three regions.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study with quantitative survey of safety information on labels of 189 new molecular entities approved in the USA, the UK, and Japan. Outcome measures were the proportions of total safety information (PSI), of contraindications (PCI), and of boxed warnings (PBW) to all information on the label. We identified a boxed warning (BW) on US and Japanese labels through a manual search. These measures were analyzed according to therapeutic indications.

RESULTS

On the Japanese labels, PSI was smaller than that on the US and UK labels for cardiovascular diseases. For neoplastic and immunologic diseases, PSI on the Japanese labels was larger than that on the UK labels. For nervous system diseases, PSI on the US labels was larger than that on the UK and the Japanese labels. PCI showed contrasting results with PSI except for neoplastic and immunologic diseases. BWs showed a poorer concordance between the USA and Japan in hematologic and genitourinary diseases than in other therapeutic areas.

CONCLUSIONS

Substantial differences in safety information exist depending upon outcome measures and therapeutic areas among the US, the UK, and the Japanese labels. This underscores the need for further analyses to determine causes of these differences to optimize drug safety regulations.

摘要

目的

尽管药品审批已实现全球化,但美国、欧洲和日本在药品安全监管方面仍存在差异。我们旨在确定这三个地区药品标签上的安全信息差异。

方法

这是一项横断面研究,对美国、英国和日本批准的 189 种新分子实体的标签上的安全信息进行了定量调查。主要结局指标是标签上的总安全性信息(PSI)、禁忌症(PCI)和警示信息(PBW)占所有信息的比例。我们通过手动搜索确定了美国和日本标签上的警示信息(BW)。根据治疗指征分析了这些措施。

结果

在日本标签上,心血管疾病的 PSI 小于美国和英国标签上的 PSI。对于肿瘤和免疫疾病,日本标签上的 PSI 大于英国标签上的 PSI。对于神经系统疾病,美国标签上的 PSI 大于英国和日本标签上的 PSI。除肿瘤和免疫疾病外,PCI 的结果与 PSI 相反。在血液学和泌尿生殖系统疾病方面,BW 在美日之间的一致性较差,而在其他治疗领域则较好。

结论

美国、英国和日本标签上的安全信息存在显著差异,具体取决于结局指标和治疗领域。这突显出需要进一步分析这些差异的原因,以优化药品安全监管。

相似文献

1
Safety information in drug labeling: a comparison of the USA, the UK, and Japan.药品标签中的安全信息:美国、英国和日本的比较。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Mar;22(3):306-18. doi: 10.1002/pds.3408. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
2
Consistency in the safety labeling of bioequivalent medications.生物等效药物安全性标签的一致性。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Mar;22(3):294-301. doi: 10.1002/pds.3351. Epub 2012 Oct 8.
3
Evaluation of FDA safety-related drug label changes in 2010.2010 年 FDA 药品标签安全性相关变更评估
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Mar;22(3):302-5. doi: 10.1002/pds.3395. Epub 2013 Jan 2.
4
Differences between the United States and Japan in labels of oncological drugs.美国和日本在肿瘤药物标签方面的差异。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Feb;26(2):143-151. doi: 10.1002/pds.4111. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
5
European Medicines Agency assesses safety reporting at Roche.欧洲药品管理局评估罗氏公司的安全报告。
Lancet Oncol. 2012 Aug;13(8):e331. doi: 10.1016/s1470-2045(12)70297-8.
6
Differences in pharmacogenomic biomarker information in package inserts from the United States, the United Kingdom and Japan.中、美、英、日四国药品说明书中药物基因组生物标志物信息的差异
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2013 Dec;38(6):468-75. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12089. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
7
Comparison of the safety information on drug labels in three developed countries: The USA, UK and Canada.美国、英国和加拿大三个发达国家药品标签上安全信息的比较。
Saudi Pharm J. 2017 Dec;25(8):1103-1107. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
8
Secret safety warnings on medicines: A case study of information access requests.药品安全警示信息公开:以信息获取请求为案例的研究
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2019 Apr;28(4):551-555. doi: 10.1002/pds.4762. Epub 2019 Mar 6.
9
Red sky in the morning: modifying prescription drug labels as a result of postmarket surveillance.早晨见红天:基于上市后监测修改处方药标签
Food Drug Law J. 2007;62(3):529-46.
10
Ethical and Practical Considerations in Removing Black Box Warnings from Drug Labels.从药品标签中移除黑框警告的伦理与实际考量
Drug Saf. 2016 Aug;39(8):709-14. doi: 10.1007/s40264-016-0419-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Signals of Adverse Reactions to Herbal Medicines: Evidence and Document Analysis Based on a Scoping Review.草药不良反应信号:基于范围综述的证据与文献分析
Drug Saf. 2025 Jul 2. doi: 10.1007/s40264-025-01580-3.
2
OnSIDES database: Extracting adverse drug events from drug labels using natural language processing models.OnSIDES数据库:使用自然语言处理模型从药品标签中提取药品不良事件。
Med. 2025 Jul 11;6(7):100642. doi: 10.1016/j.medj.2025.100642. Epub 2025 Apr 2.
3
Warning Labels as a Public Health Intervention: Effects and Challenges for Tobacco, Cannabis, and Opioid Medications.
警示标签作为一种公共卫生干预措施:对烟草、大麻和阿片类药物的影响和挑战。
Annu Rev Public Health. 2024 May;45(1):425-442. doi: 10.1146/annurev-publhealth-060922-042254. Epub 2024 Apr 3.
4
A Comparison of Safety Information in Drug Labeling at the Initial Approval of New Drugs Approved Both in Japan and the United States.新药在美日获批时的药品标签初始批准安全性信息比较
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Sep;56(5):839-847. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00431-y. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
5
Provision and Need for Medicine Information in Asia and Africa: A Scoping Review of the Literature.亚洲和非洲的医药信息提供与需求:文献范围综述。
Drug Saf. 2021 Apr;44(4):421-437. doi: 10.1007/s40264-020-01038-8. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
6
Signal detection of human papillomavirus vaccines using the Korea Adverse Events Reporting System database, between 2005 and 2016.使用 2005 年至 2016 年韩国不良事件报告系统数据库对人乳头瘤病毒疫苗进行信号检测。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2019 Oct;41(5):1365-1372. doi: 10.1007/s11096-019-00881-9. Epub 2019 Jul 16.
7
Natural language processing-based assessment of consistency in summaries of product characteristics of generic antimicrobials.基于自然语言处理的通用抗菌药物产品特性摘要一致性评估。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2018 Nov 11;6(6):e00435. doi: 10.1002/prp2.435. eCollection 2018 Dec.
8
Comparison of the safety information on drug labels in three developed countries: The USA, UK and Canada.美国、英国和加拿大三个发达国家药品标签上安全信息的比较。
Saudi Pharm J. 2017 Dec;25(8):1103-1107. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
9
Discrepancies in listed adverse drug reactions in pharmaceutical product information supplied by the regulatory authorities in Denmark and the USA.丹麦和美国监管机构提供的药品产品信息中列出的不良反应差异。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2014 Jun;2(3):e00038. doi: 10.1002/prp2.38. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
10
Concordance and predictive value of two adverse drug event data sets.两个药物不良事件数据集的一致性和预测价值。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2014 Aug 22;14:74. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-14-74.