Suppr超能文献

中、美、英、日四国药品说明书中药物基因组生物标志物信息的差异

Differences in pharmacogenomic biomarker information in package inserts from the United States, the United Kingdom and Japan.

机构信息

Center for Clinical and Translational Research, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.

出版信息

J Clin Pharm Ther. 2013 Dec;38(6):468-75. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12089. Epub 2013 Jul 29.

Abstract

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

The provision of pharmacogenomic information in drug package inserts (PIs) has become more common in recent years. The content of PIs can be tailored to meet specific requirements of the target populations. Our objective was to identify, assess and report on differences in pharmacogenomic information in PIs from the United States (USA), the United Kingdom (UK) and Japan.

METHODS

Package inserts were obtained from the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Table of Pharmacogenomic Biomarkers in Drug Labels on 1 October 2012. Corresponding PIs were obtained concurrently from Japan and the UK. We compared the pharmacogenomic information included, where the information was located, the therapeutic class of the drug, the type and purpose of the biomarker and the initial US approval year.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

One hundred eighteen PIs were included in the FDA table. Of the 118 PIs, 29 provided information on drug targets, 69 on metabolizing enzymes and 20 on other aspects. Genomic biomarkers were described in 71 PIs from the UK and 44 from Japan. Consistency in labelling across the three jurisdictions was greater in the 'Indications' section of the PIs than that in the 'Precautions' section. There appears to be greater concordance across countries for the biomarker information in the 'Indications' sections (UK 65% and Japan 48% relative to the US information) than that in the 'Precautions' sections (UK 41% and Japan 17%).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

There are substantial differences in the pharmacogenomic information included in PIs from the USA, the UK and Japan. The differences varied according to the PI sections, and type and purpose of the biomarkers. The differences appeared to vary according to the strength of the evidence supporting use of the biomarkers. Further analyses are necessary to determine the causes of these differences.

摘要

已知和目的

近年来,在药品说明书(PI)中提供药物基因组学信息变得越来越普遍。PI 的内容可以根据目标人群的具体要求进行定制。我们的目的是确定、评估和报告来自美国(美国)、英国(英国)和日本的 PI 中药物基因组学信息的差异。

方法

于 2012 年 10 月 1 日从美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)药物标签药物基因组学生物标志物表中获得 PI。同时从日本和英国获得相应的 PI。我们比较了所包含的药物基因组学信息、信息所在位置、药物治疗类别、生物标志物的类型和目的以及初始美国批准年份。

结果和讨论

FDA 表中包含 118 个 PI。在这 118 个 PI 中,有 29 个提供了药物靶点信息,69 个提供了代谢酶信息,20 个提供了其他方面的信息。英国的 71 个 PI 和日本的 44 个 PI 描述了基因组生物标志物。在三个司法管辖区中,一致性在 PI 的“适应症”部分比“注意事项”部分更高。在“适应症”部分,各国之间的生物标志物信息似乎更一致(英国为 65%,日本为 48%,而美国为 41%),而在“注意事项”部分,各国之间的一致性较低(英国为 41%,日本为 17%)。

新内容和结论

来自美国、英国和日本的 PI 中包含的药物基因组学信息存在很大差异。差异因 PI 部分、生物标志物的类型和目的而异。这些差异似乎因支持使用生物标志物的证据强度而异。需要进一步分析以确定这些差异的原因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验