• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新药在美日获批时的药品标签初始批准安全性信息比较

A Comparison of Safety Information in Drug Labeling at the Initial Approval of New Drugs Approved Both in Japan and the United States.

机构信息

Department of Clinical Medicine (Pharmaceutical Medicine), Graduate School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kitasato University, 5-9-1 Shirokane, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8641, Japan.

出版信息

Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Sep;56(5):839-847. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00431-y. Epub 2022 Jul 25.

DOI:10.1007/s43441-022-00431-y
PMID:35877034
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9310370/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Scientific information in the drug labeling is expected to be the most up-to-date and consistent information across countries where medicine is approved. The objective of the present study is to investigate the consistency of safety-related information on product labeling for novel therapeutics concurrently approved in Japan and the US.

METHODS

Safety information at the time of initial approval of new drugs approved concurrently both in Japan and the US in the recent 7 years were identified and reviewed for concordance. Factors associated with the discordance were also investigated.

RESULTS

Despite the similar medical practices, population health, and regulation in Japan and the US, the level of concordance of safety information found in the drug labeling of 45 new active substances was low (20.4%). The development strategy of the drugs and having the same MAH were significantly associated with the concordance rate. The mean concordance rate among the 9 drugs with Black Box Warning in both countries was also low (32.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

We found a low level of concordance between Japan and the US even when related to clinically important information raised by Black Box Warnings. The low concordance rate highlighted the need for a greater transparency in decision-making processes about the safety information in a drug labeling by both industry and regulators to take appropriate countermeasures against the discordance.

摘要

目的

药品标签中的科学信息应在药品获得批准的国家/地区保持最新且一致。本研究旨在调查在日本和美国同时批准的新型治疗药物的产品标签上的安全性信息的一致性。

方法

确定并审查了在最近 7 年内日本和美国同时批准的新药首次批准时的安全性信息,以进行一致性评估。还调查了导致不一致的因素。

结果

尽管日本和美国的医疗实践、人口健康和监管情况相似,但在 45 种新活性物质的药品标签中发现的安全性信息的一致性水平较低(20.4%)。药物的研发策略和拥有相同的 MAH 与一致性率显著相关。在两国均有黑框警告的 9 种药物中,平均一致性率也较低(32.9%)。

结论

即使涉及到黑框警告中提出的临床重要信息,我们也发现日本和美国之间的一致性水平较低。低一致性率突出表明,行业和监管机构需要在药品标签的安全性信息决策过程中提高透明度,以针对不一致情况采取适当的对策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3119/9310370/49eecd9dc225/43441_2022_431_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3119/9310370/53767cbfffd8/43441_2022_431_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3119/9310370/2e882b0ba683/43441_2022_431_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3119/9310370/5122ace0e3a2/43441_2022_431_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3119/9310370/49eecd9dc225/43441_2022_431_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3119/9310370/53767cbfffd8/43441_2022_431_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3119/9310370/2e882b0ba683/43441_2022_431_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3119/9310370/5122ace0e3a2/43441_2022_431_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3119/9310370/49eecd9dc225/43441_2022_431_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A Comparison of Safety Information in Drug Labeling at the Initial Approval of New Drugs Approved Both in Japan and the United States.新药在美日获批时的药品标签初始批准安全性信息比较
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2022 Sep;56(5):839-847. doi: 10.1007/s43441-022-00431-y. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
2
A comparison of decision and timing of safety related labeling changes for new drugs approved both in Japan and the United States.比较在日本和美国获批的新药的安全性相关标签变更的决策和时机。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021 May;30(5):561-572. doi: 10.1002/pds.5203. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
3
Decision and timing of safety-related labeling changes for new drugs in Japan: Comparison with the United States and the European Union.日本新药安全性相关标签变更的决策与时机:与美国和欧盟的比较。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2023 Dec;32(12):1331-1340. doi: 10.1002/pds.5664. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
4
Review of FDA Amendments Act Section 921 Experience in Posting Data-mining Results from the FAERS Database.美国食品和药物管理局修正案第 921 节对 FAERS 数据库数据挖掘结果公布经验的审查。
Clin Ther. 2021 Feb;43(2):380-395. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2020.12.011. Epub 2021 Jan 24.
5
Safety information in drug labeling: a comparison of the USA, the UK, and Japan.药品标签中的安全信息:美国、英国和日本的比较。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Mar;22(3):306-18. doi: 10.1002/pds.3408. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
6
Differences between the United States and Japan in labels of oncological drugs.美国和日本在肿瘤药物标签方面的差异。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Feb;26(2):143-151. doi: 10.1002/pds.4111. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
7
Evaluation of Pre-marketing Factors to Predict Post-marketing Boxed Warnings and Safety Withdrawals.评估上市前因素以预测上市后黑框警告和安全性撤市情况。
Drug Saf. 2017 Jun;40(6):497-503. doi: 10.1007/s40264-017-0526-1.
8
Differences in pharmacogenomic biomarker information in package inserts from the United States, the United Kingdom and Japan.中、美、英、日四国药品说明书中药物基因组生物标志物信息的差异
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2013 Dec;38(6):468-75. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12089. Epub 2013 Jul 29.
9
Sources of Evidence Triggering and Supporting Safety-Related Labeling Changes: A 10-Year Longitudinal Assessment of 22 New Molecular Entities Approved in 2008 by the US Food and Drug Administration.引发并支持与安全性相关标签变更的证据来源:对美国食品药品监督管理局2008年批准的22种新分子实体进行的10年纵向评估
Drug Saf. 2022 Feb;45(2):169-180. doi: 10.1007/s40264-021-01142-3. Epub 2022 Feb 3.
10
Era of faster FDA drug approval has also seen increased black-box warnings and market withdrawals.美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)加快药品审批的时代,黑框警告和药品退市情况也有所增加。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2014 Aug;33(8):1453-9. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0122.

引用本文的文献

1
Aggregation of Adverse Event Terms for Signal Detection and Labeling in Clinical Trials.临床试验中用于信号检测和标签标注的不良事件术语汇总
Drug Saf. 2025 Feb 14. doi: 10.1007/s40264-025-01518-9.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison of decision and timing of safety related labeling changes for new drugs approved both in Japan and the United States.比较在日本和美国获批的新药的安全性相关标签变更的决策和时机。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2021 May;30(5):561-572. doi: 10.1002/pds.5203. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
2
Comparison of the safety information on drug labels in three developed countries: The USA, UK and Canada.美国、英国和加拿大三个发达国家药品标签上安全信息的比较。
Saudi Pharm J. 2017 Dec;25(8):1103-1107. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2017.07.006. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
3
ADHD medications and cardiovascular adverse events in children and adolescents: cross-national comparison of risk communication in drug labeling.
儿童和青少年注意力缺陷多动障碍药物与心血管不良事件:药品标签中风险沟通的跨国比较
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2017 Mar;26(3):274-284. doi: 10.1002/pds.4164. Epub 2017 Jan 13.
4
Neuropsychiatric Adverse Reactions to Mefloquine: a Systematic Comparison of Prescribing and Patient Safety Guidance in the US, UK, Ireland, Australia, New Zealand, and Canada.抗疟药甲氟喹的神经精神不良反应:美国、英国、爱尔兰、澳大利亚、新西兰和加拿大的处方与患者安全指南的系统比较。
Neurol Ther. 2016 Jun;5(1):69-83. doi: 10.1007/s40120-016-0045-5. Epub 2016 May 30.
5
Multi-regional clinical trials and global drug development.多区域临床试验与全球药物研发。
Perspect Clin Res. 2016 Apr-Jun;7(2):62-7. doi: 10.4103/2229-3485.179430.
6
Discrepancies in listed adverse drug reactions in pharmaceutical product information supplied by the regulatory authorities in Denmark and the USA.丹麦和美国监管机构提供的药品产品信息中列出的不良反应差异。
Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2014 Jun;2(3):e00038. doi: 10.1002/prp2.38. Epub 2014 Apr 22.
7
A cross-national comparison of 17 countries' insulin glargine drug labels.17个国家甘精胰岛素药品标签的跨国比较。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Feb;24(2):159-65. doi: 10.1002/pds.3704. Epub 2014 Sep 24.
8
Comparison of pregnancy and lactation labeling for attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder drugs marketed in Australia, the USA, Denmark, and the UK.澳大利亚、美国、丹麦和英国市场上销售的注意力缺陷多动障碍药物的妊娠和哺乳期标签比较。
Drug Saf. 2014 Oct;37(10):805-13. doi: 10.1007/s40264-014-0215-2.
9
Safety information in drug labeling: a comparison of the USA, the UK, and Japan.药品标签中的安全信息:美国、英国和日本的比较。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Mar;22(3):306-18. doi: 10.1002/pds.3408. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
10
Different black box warning labeling for same-class drugs.不同同类药物的黑框警告标签。
J Gen Intern Med. 2011 Jun;26(6):603-10. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1633-9. Epub 2011 Feb 1.