Song Ken, Musci Thomas J, Caughey Aaron B
Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc., San Jose, CA, USA.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2013 Aug;26(12):1180-5. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.770464. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
Evaluate the clinical and economic consequences of fetal trisomy 21 (T21) screening with non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in high-risk pregnant women.
Using a decision-analytic model, we estimated the number of T21 cases detected, the number of invasive procedures performed, corresponding euploid fetal losses and total costs for three screening strategies: first trimester combined screening (FTS), integrated screening (INT) or NIPT, whereby NIPT was performed in high-risk patients (women 35 years or older or women with a positive conventional screening test). Modeling was based on a 4 million pregnant women cohort in the US.
NIPT, at a base case price of $795, was more clinically effective and less costly (dominant) over both FTS and INT. NIPT detected 4823 T21 cases based on 5330 invasive procedures. FTS detected 3364 T21 cases based on 108 364 procedures and INT detected 3760 cases based on 108 760 procedures. NIPT detected 28% and 43% more T21 cases compared to INT and FTS, respectively, while reducing invasive procedures by >95% and reducing euploid fetal losses by >99%. Total costs were $3786M with FTS, $3919M with INT and $3403M with NIPT.
NIPT leads to improved T21 detection and reduction in euploid fetal loss at lower total healthcare expenditures.
评估对高危孕妇采用无创产前检测(NIPT)进行胎儿21三体(T21)筛查的临床和经济后果。
我们使用决策分析模型,估计了三种筛查策略检测到的T21病例数、进行的侵入性操作数量、相应的整倍体胎儿丢失情况以及总成本,这三种筛查策略分别为孕早期联合筛查(FTS)、综合筛查(INT)或NIPT,其中NIPT应用于高危患者(35岁及以上女性或传统筛查试验呈阳性的女性)。建模基于美国400万孕妇队列。
在基础价格为795美元的情况下,NIPT在临床效果上优于FTS和INT,且成本更低(占主导地位)。NIPT基于5330次侵入性操作检测到4823例T21病例。FTS基于108364次操作检测到3364例T21病例,INT基于108760次操作检测到3760例病例。与INT和FTS相比,NIPT分别多检测到28%和43%的T21病例,同时将侵入性操作减少了95%以上,将整倍体胎儿丢失减少了99%以上。FTS的总成本为37.86亿美元,INT为39.19亿美元,NIPT为34.03亿美元。
NIPT可在降低总体医疗支出的情况下提高T21的检测率并减少整倍体胎儿丢失。