• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过基于绩效的风险分担协议扩大无创产前检测覆盖范围的经济影响

Economic Impact of Coverage Expansion for Non-invasive Prenatal Testing Through a Performance-Based Risk-Sharing Agreement.

作者信息

Quinlan Taryn A G, Schroeder Brock, Kwon Sue, Barlow Jane F, Sherman Michael S, Anderson Heather D, Wright Garth, McQueen R Brett

机构信息

Department of Health Systems, Management and Policy, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA.

Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacoecon Open. 2021 Sep;5(3):449-458. doi: 10.1007/s41669-021-00261-y. Epub 2021 Mar 10.

DOI:10.1007/s41669-021-00261-y
PMID:33689154
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7944877/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Harvard Pilgrim Health Care expanded coverage for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) to include all pregnant, single-gestation women aged < 35 years, through a performance-based risk-sharing (PBRS) agreement with Illumina to offset costs from coverage expansion. NIPT analyzes cell-free DNA fragments from a maternal blood sample to screen for fetal aneuploidies and is considered a more accurate screening method than conventional serum biochemical screening and nuchal translucency ultrasound-based approaches.

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the impact of NIPT coverage expansion on prenatal screening strategies and payer expenditures.

METHODS

This was a real-world comparison of utilization and expenditures of prenatal screening and diagnostic testing in pregnant women aged < 35 years pre- (1 March 2016-28 February 2018) and post- (1 March 2018-30 September 2019) coverage expansion. Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated to compare changes in utilization of conventional and NIPT-based prenatal screening methods. Change in per member per month (PMPM) expenditures in $US year 2020 were assessed post-coverage expansion using a budget impact model.

RESULTS

A total of 5041 and 4109 distinct pregnancies were identified in pre- and post-coverage expansion periods, respectively. Mean ± standard deviation maternal age was consistent between pre- and post-coverage expansion periods (30.35 ± 3.35 and 30.33 ± 3.28, respectively). Screening orders for conventional methods decreased, with an adjusted IRR in the post-expansion period of 0.87 (95% CI 0.85-0.90) times the rate in the pre-expansion period; orders for NIPT increased, with an adjusted IRR in the post-expansion period of 1.41 (95% CI 1.32-1.51) times the rate in the pre-expansion period. Invasive diagnostic testing was low at baseline (1.0%) and did not change post-coverage expansion. The change in PMPM is estimated at $US0.026 post-coverage expansion.

CONCLUSION

The PBRS agreement to expand NIPT coverage for women aged < 35 years was associated with an increase in NIPT utilization, decreases in conventional screening methods, and a modest increase in PMPM expenditures.

摘要

背景

哈佛朝圣者医疗保健公司通过与Illumina签订基于绩效的风险分担(PBRS)协议,扩大了非侵入性产前检测(NIPT)的覆盖范围,将所有年龄小于35岁的单胎妊娠孕妇纳入其中,以抵消覆盖范围扩大带来的成本。NIPT分析母血样本中的游离DNA片段,以筛查胎儿非整倍体,被认为是一种比传统血清生化筛查和基于颈部透明带超声的方法更准确的筛查方法。

目的

本研究评估了NIPT覆盖范围扩大对产前筛查策略和支付方支出的影响。

方法

这是一项对年龄小于35岁的孕妇在覆盖范围扩大前(2016年3月1日至2018年2月28日)和扩大后(2018年3月1日至2019年9月30日)的产前筛查和诊断检测的使用情况及支出进行的真实世界比较。估计发病率比(IRR)及其95%置信区间(CI),以比较传统产前筛查方法和基于NIPT的产前筛查方法使用情况的变化。使用预算影响模型评估覆盖范围扩大后2020年的人均每月(PMPM)支出变化。

结果

在覆盖范围扩大前和扩大后分别确定了5041例和4109例不同的妊娠。覆盖范围扩大前后孕妇的平均年龄±标准差一致(分别为30.35±3.35和30.33±3.28)。传统方法的筛查订单减少,扩大后时期的调整后IRR为扩大前时期的0.87倍(95%CI 0.85 - 0.90);NIPT的订单增加,扩大后时期的调整后IRR为扩大前时期的1.41倍(95%CI 1.32 - 1.51)。侵入性诊断检测在基线时较低(1.0%),覆盖范围扩大后没有变化。覆盖范围扩大后PMPM的变化估计为0.026美元。

结论

为年龄小于35岁的女性扩大NIPT覆盖范围的PBRS协议与NIPT使用增加、传统筛查方法减少以及PMPM支出适度增加有关。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4a4/8333239/82e1874dcd69/41669_2021_261_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4a4/8333239/d88cfe393192/41669_2021_261_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4a4/8333239/82e1874dcd69/41669_2021_261_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4a4/8333239/d88cfe393192/41669_2021_261_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b4a4/8333239/82e1874dcd69/41669_2021_261_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Economic Impact of Coverage Expansion for Non-invasive Prenatal Testing Through a Performance-Based Risk-Sharing Agreement.通过基于绩效的风险分担协议扩大无创产前检测覆盖范围的经济影响
Pharmacoecon Open. 2021 Sep;5(3):449-458. doi: 10.1007/s41669-021-00261-y. Epub 2021 Mar 10.
2
Noninvasive Prenatal Testing for Trisomies 21, 18, and 13, Sex Chromosome Aneuploidies, and Microdeletions: A Health Technology Assessment.21三体、18三体和13三体、性染色体非整倍体及微缺失的无创产前检测:一项卫生技术评估
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2019 Feb 19;19(4):1-166. eCollection 2019.
3
Prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy in singleton pregnancies.单胎妊娠胎儿非整倍体的产前筛查。
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2011 Jul;33(7):736-750. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(16)34961-1.
4
Health economic evaluation of noninvasive prenatal testing and serum screening for down syndrome.非侵入性产前检测和唐氏综合征血清筛查的健康经济评估。
PLoS One. 2022 Apr 14;17(4):e0266718. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266718. eCollection 2022.
5
Cell-Free DNA-Based Non-invasive Prenatal Screening for Common Aneuploidies in a Canadian Province: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.加拿大某省基于游离DNA的常见非整倍体无创产前筛查:一项成本效益分析
J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2018 Jan;40(1):48-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2017.05.015. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
6
Clinical utility of non-invasive prenatal testing in pregnancies with ultrasound anomalies.超声异常妊娠中非侵入性产前检测的临床应用价值
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Jun;49(6):721-728. doi: 10.1002/uog.17228.
7
Racial and ethnic disparities in non-invasive prenatal testing adherence: a retrospective cohort study.非侵入性产前检测依从性方面的种族和民族差异:一项回顾性队列研究。
Minerva Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Jul 2. doi: 10.23736/S2724-606X.24.05530-1.
8
The consequences of implementing non-invasive prenatal testing in Dutch national health care: a cost-effectiveness analysis.在荷兰国家医疗保健体系中实施非侵入性产前检测的后果:一项成本效益分析。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2014 Nov;182:53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.08.028. Epub 2014 Aug 30.
9
Introducing cell-free DNA noninvasive testing in a Down syndrome public health screening program: a budget impact analysis.在唐氏综合征公共卫生筛查项目中引入游离DNA无创检测:预算影响分析
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2020 Nov 4;18(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s12962-020-00245-5.
10
Change in rates of prenatal tests for chromosomal abnormality over a 12-year period in women of advanced maternal age.高龄孕产妇12年间染色体异常产前检查率的变化
Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2018 Jul;61(4):453-460. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2018.61.4.453. Epub 2018 Jun 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-invasive prenatal testing in mitigating concerns from invasive prenatal diagnostic testing: retrospective assessment of utility in an academic healthcare system in the US.非侵入性产前检测在减轻侵入性产前诊断检测引起的担忧方面的作用:美国学术医疗系统中的回顾性评估。
BMJ Open. 2022 Jun 15;12(6):e057658. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-057658.
2
Multicancer Screening Tests: Anticipating And Addressing Considerations For Payer Coverage And Patient Access.多癌种筛查检测:为支付方覆盖范围和患者可及性考虑因素做准备和应对。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2022 Mar;41(3):383-389. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2021.01316.

本文引用的文献

1
Screening for Fetal Chromosomal Abnormalities: ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 226.筛查胎儿染色体异常:ACOG 实践公告,第 226 号。
Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Oct;136(4):e48-e69. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004084.
2
Cell-free DNA for Down syndrome screening in obese women: Is it a cost-effective strategy?用于肥胖女性唐氏综合征筛查的游离 DNA:这是一种具有成本效益的策略吗?
Prenat Diagn. 2020 Jan;40(2):173-178. doi: 10.1002/pd.5605. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
3
TRIDENT-2: National Implementation of Genome-wide Non-invasive Prenatal Testing as a First-Tier Screening Test in the Netherlands.
TRIDENT-2:荷兰全国范围内实施全基因组非侵入性产前筛查作为一级筛查检测。
Am J Hum Genet. 2019 Dec 5;105(6):1091-1101. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.10.005. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
4
Cell-free fetal DNA screening for detection of microdeletion syndromes: a cost-effectiveness analysis.游离胎儿DNA筛查用于检测微缺失综合征:一项成本效益分析。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2021 Jun;34(11):1732-1740. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2019.1647161. Epub 2019 Aug 5.
5
Maternal age trends support uptake of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) in the low-risk population.产妇年龄趋势支持在低风险人群中采用无创产前检测(NIPT)。
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2019 Dec;32(23):4039-4042. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2018.1481033. Epub 2018 Jun 20.
6
Performance-Based Risk-Sharing Arrangements: An Updated International Review.基于绩效的风险分担安排:最新国际综述。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2017 Oct;35(10):1063-1072. doi: 10.1007/s40273-017-0535-z.
7
Analysis of cell-free DNA in maternal blood in screening for aneuploidies: updated meta-analysis.母体血液游离 DNA 分析在非整倍体筛查中的应用:更新的荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Sep;50(3):302-314. doi: 10.1002/uog.17484. Epub 2017 Jul 27.
8
Noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy, 2016 update: a position statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics.胎儿非整倍体无创产前筛查,2016年更新:美国医学遗传学与基因组学学会立场声明
Genet Med. 2016 Oct;18(10):1056-65. doi: 10.1038/gim.2016.97. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
9
Practice Bulletin No. 163: Screening for Fetal Aneuploidy.实践通报第 163 号:胎儿非整倍体筛查。
Obstet Gynecol. 2016 May;127(5):e123-e137. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001406.
10
Private sector risk-sharing agreements in the United States: trends, barriers, and prospects.美国私营部门风险分担协议:趋势、障碍与前景
Am J Manag Care. 2015 Sep;21(9):632-40.