Laboratory of Cognitive Psychology, Department of Psychology, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Milan, Italy.
Neuroscience. 2013 Apr 16;236:12-20. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.12.059. Epub 2013 Jan 26.
In this study, we analysed facial expression detection and facial mimicry behaviour in response to an emotional empathic task. We posited that a "simulation mechanism" may be related to emotional face detection and that this mechanism could be supported by prefrontal cortical structures. To evaluate our hypothesis, we requested 16 subjects to emotionally empathise with facial stimuli and applied high frequency repeated transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) to the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC) in order to induce an increased response to the facial expressions of emotion. To determine whether emotional content affects empathic behaviour, we also varied the stimulus valence (negative vs. positive vs. neutral faces). We found that autonomic (facial zygomatic and corrugator electromyography (EMG) subjective response) and detection (correct responses (CRs); response times (RTs)) measures were modulated by the MPFC activity. Specifically, when prefrontal structures were activated, subjects displayed an increased performance in CRs and reduced RTs for face recognition, as well as increased emotion-specific EMG responses in comparison to sham effects and control site stimulation. In fact, the zygomatic muscle was more responsive in cases of positive emotion (happiness), whereas corrugator activity was more robust during periods of negative emotion (fear, anger, disgust). However, an overall stronger effect was observed in response to negative, and potentially aversive, faces when compared with responses to positive and neutral faces. Finally, a direct correlation was found between the psychophysiological responses and detection measures. In summary, these results suggest that a "simulation mechanism" underlies emotion detection in an empathic situation that includes both EMG and behavioural responses. This mechanism appears to be supported and regulated by the MPFC area.
在这项研究中,我们分析了面部表情检测和面部模仿行为,以响应情感共情任务。我们假设一种“模拟机制”可能与情绪面孔检测有关,这种机制可能得到前额皮质结构的支持。为了评估我们的假设,我们要求 16 名受试者对面部刺激进行情感共情,并对内侧前额叶皮层(MPFC)进行高频重复经颅磁刺激(rTMS),以增加对情绪面部表情的反应。为了确定情绪内容是否会影响共情行为,我们还改变了刺激效价(负性、正性、中性面孔)。我们发现,自主(面部颧肌和皱眉肌肌电图(EMG)主观反应)和检测(正确反应(CRs);反应时间(RTs))措施受 MPFC 活动的调节。具体而言,当前额结构被激活时,与假刺激和对照部位刺激相比,受试者在 CRs 中表现出更高的表现,在面部识别中的 RTs 降低,并且在情绪特异性 EMG 反应中表现出更高的表现,而在情绪特异性 EMG 反应中表现出更高的表现。事实上,在正性情绪(幸福)时,颧肌的反应更强,而在负性情绪(恐惧、愤怒、厌恶)时,皱眉肌的反应更强。然而,与对正性和中性面孔的反应相比,对负性和潜在厌恶面孔的反应观察到更强的整体效应。最后,在生理心理反应和检测措施之间发现了直接的相关性。总之,这些结果表明,一种“模拟机制”是情感共情情况下的情绪检测的基础,包括 EMG 和行为反应。这种机制似乎得到了 MPFC 区域的支持和调节。