• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

共情成分问卷(ECQ)的编制与验证

The Development and Validation of the Empathy Components Questionnaire (ECQ).

作者信息

Batchelder Laurie, Brosnan Mark, Ashwin Chris

机构信息

Dept. of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2017 Jan 11;12(1):e0169185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169185. eCollection 2017.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0169185
PMID:28076406
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5226785/
Abstract

Key research suggests that empathy is a multidimensional construct comprising of both cognitive and affective components. More recent theories and research suggest even further factors within these components of empathy, including the ability to empathize with others versus the drive towards empathizing with others. While numerous self-report measures have been developed to examine empathy, none of them currently index all of these wider components together. The aim of the present research was to develop and validate the Empathy Components Questionnaire (ECQ) to measure cognitive and affective components, as well as ability and drive components within each. Study one utilized items measuring cognitive and affective empathy taken from various established questionnaires to create an initial version of the ECQ. Principal component analysis (PCA) was used to examine the underlying components of empathy within the ECQ in a sample of 101 typical adults. Results revealed a five-component model consisting of cognitive ability, cognitive drive, affective ability, affective drive, and a fifth factor assessing affective reactivity. This five-component structure was then validated and confirmed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) in an independent sample of 211 typical adults. Results also showed that females scored higher than males overall on the ECQ, and on specific components, which is consistent with previous findings of a female advantage on self-reported empathy. Findings also showed certain components predicted scores on an independent measure of social behavior, which provided good convergent validity of the ECQ. Together, these findings validate the newly developed ECQ as a multidimensional measure of empathy more in-line with current theories of empathy. The ECQ provides a useful new tool for quick and easy measurement of empathy and its components for research with both healthy and clinical populations.

摘要

关键研究表明,共情是一个多维概念,由认知和情感成分组成。最近的理论和研究表明,在共情的这些成分中还存在更多因素,包括对他人产生共情的能力与产生共情的驱动力。虽然已经开发了许多自我报告测量方法来检验共情,但目前没有一种方法能将所有这些更广泛的成分综合起来进行指标化。本研究的目的是开发并验证共情成分问卷(ECQ),以测量认知和情感成分,以及每个成分中的能力和驱动力成分。研究一使用从各种已确立的问卷中选取的测量认知和情感共情的项目,创建了ECQ的初始版本。主成分分析(PCA)用于在101名典型成年人的样本中检验ECQ中共情的潜在成分。结果揭示了一个五成分模型,包括认知能力、认知驱动力、情感能力、情感驱动力,以及评估情感反应性的第五个因素。然后,在211名典型成年人的独立样本中,使用验证性因素分析(CFA)对这个五成分结构进行了验证和确认。结果还表明,女性在ECQ总分及特定成分上的得分高于男性,这与之前关于女性在自我报告的共情方面具有优势的研究结果一致。研究结果还表明,某些成分能够预测一项独立的社会行为测量指标的得分,这为ECQ提供了良好的聚合效度。总之,这些研究结果验证了新开发的ECQ作为一种更符合当前共情理论的多维共情测量方法。ECQ为健康人群和临床人群的研究提供了一种快速简便地测量共情及其成分的有用新工具。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16e1/5226785/722434ac0ba1/pone.0169185.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16e1/5226785/8972fa54ea94/pone.0169185.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16e1/5226785/a0b242c705fe/pone.0169185.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16e1/5226785/00788284f37c/pone.0169185.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16e1/5226785/722434ac0ba1/pone.0169185.g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16e1/5226785/8972fa54ea94/pone.0169185.g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16e1/5226785/a0b242c705fe/pone.0169185.g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16e1/5226785/00788284f37c/pone.0169185.g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/16e1/5226785/722434ac0ba1/pone.0169185.g004.jpg

相似文献

1
The Development and Validation of the Empathy Components Questionnaire (ECQ).共情成分问卷(ECQ)的编制与验证
PLoS One. 2017 Jan 11;12(1):e0169185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169185. eCollection 2017.
2
The validation of a Mandarin version of the Empathy Components Questionnaire (ECQ-Chinese) in Chinese samples.中文同理心分量表(ECQ-Chinese)的中文样本验证。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 26;18(1):e0275903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275903. eCollection 2023.
3
The QCAE: a Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy.中文问卷认知与情感同理心测验(QCAE)
J Pers Assess. 2011 Jan;93(1):84-95. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2010.528484.
4
[Psychometric properties of the French version of the How I Think Questionnaire].[《我如何思考问卷》法语版的心理测量学特性]
Encephale. 2013 Dec;39(6):401-7. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2012.10.013. Epub 2013 Mar 26.
5
Psychometric properties of the questionnaire of cognitive and affective empathy in a Portuguese sample.中文版问卷认知和情感同理心的心理测量特性。
PLoS One. 2018 Jun 1;13(6):e0197755. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0197755. eCollection 2018.
6
The Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy: A Comparison Between Paper-and-Pencil Versus Online Formats in Italian Samples.认知与情感同理心问卷:意大利样本中纸笔与在线格式的比较。
J Pers Assess. 2019 Mar-Apr;101(2):159-170. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2017.1389745. Epub 2017 Nov 13.
7
Validation and extension of the Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy in the Chinese setting.《认知与情感共情问卷》在中国背景下的效度验证与拓展
Psych J. 2019 Dec;8(4):439-448. doi: 10.1002/pchj.281. Epub 2019 Apr 15.
8
Assessing Cognitive and Affective Empathy Through the Interpersonal Reactivity Index: An Argument Against a Two-Factor Model.通过人际反应指数评估认知共情和情感共情:对双因素模型的质疑
Assessment. 2016 Dec;23(6):769-777. doi: 10.1177/1073191115599055. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
9
Comparing the factor structure of the Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales and the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire.比较威斯康星分裂型特质量表和分裂型人格问卷的因素结构。
Personal Disord. 2014 Oct;5(4):397-405. doi: 10.1037/per0000090.
10
Life history of impulsive behavior: development and validation of a new questionnaire.冲动行为的生活史:一个新问卷的编制与验证。
J Psychiatr Res. 2012 Mar;46(3):346-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2011.11.008. Epub 2011 Dec 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Validation of the German Emotional Contagion Scale and development of a mimicry brief version.德国情绪感染量表的验证及一个模仿简版的编制
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 9;20(9):e0331953. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0331953. eCollection 2025.
2
Harnessing Virtual Reality to Influence Attitudes Toward Beef Consumption: The Role of Empathy in Dietary Interventions.利用虚拟现实影响对牛肉消费的态度:同理心在饮食干预中的作用。
Foods. 2024 Nov 22;13(23):3750. doi: 10.3390/foods13233750.
3
Exploring the link between empathy, stress, altruism, and loneliness in university students during the COVID-19 pandemic: A cross-sectional study.

本文引用的文献

1
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.因子数量的碎石检验
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
2
A Comparison Of Component And Factor Patterns: A Monte Carlo Approach.成分模式与因子模式的比较:一种蒙特卡罗方法。
Multivariate Behav Res. 1982 Jul 1;17(3):371-88. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr1703_5.
3
Feeling but not caring: empathic alteration in narcissistic men with high psychopathic traits.有情感但漠不关心:高精神病态特质自恋男性的共情改变。
探讨 COVID-19 大流行期间大学生同理心、压力、利他主义和孤独感之间的联系:一项横断面研究。
Brain Behav. 2024 Sep;14(9):e70049. doi: 10.1002/brb3.70049.
4
Susceptibility to positive versus negative emotional contagion: First evidence on their distinction using a balanced self-report measure.对正性和负性情绪共鸣的易感性:使用平衡的自陈式量表对其进行区分的首个证据。
PLoS One. 2024 May 14;19(5):e0302890. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0302890. eCollection 2024.
5
Empathy and Schizotypy: A Network Comparison of the Interpersonal Reactivity Index in High and Low Schizotypy Groups.共情与分裂型特质:高分裂型特质组与低分裂型特质组人际反应指数的网络比较
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Mar 18;14(3):245. doi: 10.3390/bs14030245.
6
Measures of empathy and compassion: A scoping review.同理心和同情心的测量:范围综述。
PLoS One. 2024 Jan 19;19(1):e0297099. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297099. eCollection 2024.
7
To respond or not to respond: exploring empathy-related psychological and structural brain differences between placebo analgesia responders and non-responders.回应还是不回应:探究安慰剂镇痛反应者与无反应者之间与共情相关的心理及大脑结构差异。
Front Psychol. 2023 Oct 2;14:1257522. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1257522. eCollection 2023.
8
The validation of a Mandarin version of the Empathy Components Questionnaire (ECQ-Chinese) in Chinese samples.中文同理心分量表(ECQ-Chinese)的中文样本验证。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 26;18(1):e0275903. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275903. eCollection 2023.
9
Calf care workers' attitudes and personality and their association with calf mortality in large-scale dairy farms.大型奶牛场犊牛护理人员的态度、性格及其与犊牛死亡率的关联
Front Vet Sci. 2022 Oct 14;9:959548. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2022.959548. eCollection 2022.
10
Virtual reality to foster empathy in disability workers: A feasibility study during COVID-19.虚拟现实培养残疾工作者的同理心:COVID-19 期间的可行性研究。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2023 Jan;36(1):132-142. doi: 10.1111/jar.13042. Epub 2022 Oct 17.
Psychiatry Res. 2014 Dec 30;224(3):341-8. doi: 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2014.10.002. Epub 2014 Oct 13.
4
Not as good as you think? Trait positive emotion is associated with increased self-reported empathy but decreased empathic performance.没有你想象的那么好?特质积极情绪与自我报告的同理心增加相关,但与共情表现下降相关。
PLoS One. 2014 Oct 29;9(10):e110470. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0110470. eCollection 2014.
5
Empathy: a motivated account.共情:一种有动机的解释。
Psychol Bull. 2014 Nov;140(6):1608-47. doi: 10.1037/a0037679.
6
Empathy: gender effects in brain and behavior.同理心:大脑与行为中的性别差异
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Oct;46 Pt 4(Pt 4):604-27. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.001. Epub 2014 Sep 16.
7
The highly sensitive brain: an fMRI study of sensory processing sensitivity and response to others' emotions.高度敏感的大脑:一项关于感官处理敏感性及对他人情绪反应的功能磁共振成像研究
Brain Behav. 2014 Jul;4(4):580-94. doi: 10.1002/brb3.242. Epub 2014 Jun 23.
8
Attenuation of typical sex differences in 800 adults with autism vs. 3,900 controls.800名自闭症成年人与3900名对照者中典型性别差异的减弱。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 16;9(7):e102251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0102251. eCollection 2014.
9
Dissociating the ability and propensity for empathy.区分共情的能力和倾向。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Apr;18(4):163-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.12.011. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
10
Spontaneous versus deliberate vicarious representations: different routes to empathy in psychopathy and autism.自发与刻意的替代性表征:精神病态和自闭症中产生共情的不同途径。
Brain. 2014 Apr;137(Pt 4):e272. doi: 10.1093/brain/awt364. Epub 2014 Jan 28.