Schaefer Sydney Y, Haaland Kathleen Y, Sainburg Robert L
Department of Kinesiology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.
Brain. 2007 Aug;130(Pt 8):2146-58. doi: 10.1093/brain/awm145. Epub 2007 Jul 11.
Recent reports of functional impairment in the 'unaffected' limb of stroke patients have suggested that these deficits vary with the side of lesion. This not only supports the idea that the ipsilateral hemisphere contributes to arm movements, but also implies that such contributions are lateralized. We have previously suggested that the left and right hemispheres are specialized for controlling different features of movement. In reaching movements, the non-dominant arm appears better adapted for achieving accurate final positions and the dominant arm for specifying initial trajectory features, such as movement direction and peak acceleration. The purpose of this study was to determine whether different features of control could characterize ipsilesional motor deficits following stroke. Healthy control subjects and patients with either left- or right-hemisphere damage performed targeted single-joint elbow movements of different amplitudes in their ipsilateral hemispace. We predicted that left-hemisphere damage would produce deficits in specification of initial trajectory features, while right-hemisphere damage would produce deficits in final position accuracy. Consistent with our predictions, patients with left, but not right, hemisphere damage showed reduced modulation of acceleration amplitude. However, patients with right, but not left, hemisphere damage showed significantly larger errors in final position, which corresponded to reduced modulation of acceleration duration. Neither patient group differed from controls in terms of movement speed. Instead, the mechanisms by which speed was specified, through modulation of acceleration amplitude and modulation of acceleration duration, appeared to be differentially affected by left- and right-hemisphere damage. These findings support the idea that each hemisphere contributes differentially to the control of initial trajectory and final position, and that ipsilesional deficits following stroke reflect this lateralization in control.
近期有关中风患者“未受影响”肢体功能障碍的报告表明,这些缺陷因病变部位而异。这不仅支持了同侧半球对手臂运动有贡献的观点,还意味着这种贡献是有偏向性的。我们之前曾提出,左、右半球专门负责控制运动的不同特征。在伸手动作中,非优势手臂似乎更适合实现精确的最终位置,而优势手臂则更适合确定初始轨迹特征,如运动方向和峰值加速度。本研究的目的是确定不同的控制特征是否可表征中风后同侧运动缺陷。健康对照受试者以及左半球或右半球受损的患者在其同侧半空间内进行了不同幅度的单关节肘部定向运动。我们预测,左半球损伤会导致初始轨迹特征确定方面的缺陷,而右半球损伤会导致最终位置准确性方面的缺陷。与我们的预测一致,左半球而非右半球受损的患者表现出加速度幅度调制降低。然而,右半球而非左半球受损的患者在最终位置上显示出明显更大的误差,这与加速度持续时间调制降低相对应。两组患者在运动速度方面与对照组均无差异。相反,通过加速度幅度调制和加速度持续时间调制来确定速度的机制似乎受到左、右半球损伤的不同影响。这些发现支持了以下观点:每个半球对初始轨迹和最终位置的控制贡献不同,且中风后的同侧缺陷反映了这种控制中的偏向性。