• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经细导管在自主呼吸时给予表面活性剂:随机对照试验。

Surfactant administration via thin catheter during spontaneous breathing: randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Zekai Tahir Burak Kadin Sagligi Egitim ve Arastirma Hastanesi, Talatpasa Bulvari, Samanpazari, Ankara; Turkey 06230.

出版信息

Pediatrics. 2013 Feb;131(2):e502-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0603. Epub 2013 Jan 28.

DOI:10.1542/peds.2012-0603
PMID:23359581
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The primary aim of this randomized study was to describe the feasibility of early administration of surfactant via a thin catheter during spontaneous breathing (Take Care) and compare early mechanical ventilation (MV) requirement with the InSurE (Intubate, Surfactant, Extubate) procedure.

METHODS

Preterm infants, who were <32 weeks and stabilized with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) in the delivery room, were randomized to receive early surfactant treatment either by the Take Care or InSurE technique. Tracheal instillation of 100 mg/kg poractant α via 5-F catheter during spontaneous breathing under nCPAP was performed in the intervention group. In the InSurE procedure, infants were intubated, received positive pressure ventilation for 30 seconds after surfactant instillation, and placed on nCPAP immediately.

RESULTS

One hundred infants in each group were analyzed. The MV requirement in the first 72 hours of life was significantly lower in the Take Care group when compared with the InSurE group (30% vs 45%, P = .02, odds ratio -0.52, 95% confidence interval -0.94 to -0.29). Mean duration of both nCPAP and MV were significantly shorter in the Take Care group (P values .006 and .002, respectively). Bronchopulmonary dysplasia rate was significantly lower among the infants treated with the Take Care technique (relative risk -0.27, 95% confidence interval -0.1 to -0.72)

CONCLUSIONS

The Take Care technique is feasible for the treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in infants with very low birth weight. It significantly reduces both the need and duration of MV, and thus the bronchopulmonary dysplasia rate in preterm infants.

摘要

背景

本随机研究的主要目的是描述在自主呼吸时通过细导管早期给予表面活性剂(Take Care)的可行性,并比较早期机械通气(MV)的需求与 InSurE(插管、表面活性剂、拔管)程序。

方法

将在产房接受经鼻持续气道正压通气(nCPAP)稳定的极早产儿随机分为接受 Take Care 或 InSurE 技术的早期表面活性剂治疗。干预组在 nCPAP 下自主呼吸时通过 5-F 导管给予 100mg/kg 猪肺磷脂α。在 InSurE 程序中,婴儿插管,在表面活性剂注入后接受正压通气 30 秒,然后立即置于 nCPAP 上。

结果

每组 100 例婴儿进行分析。与 InSurE 组相比,Take Care 组在生命的前 72 小时内的 MV 需求显著降低(30%对 45%,P=0.02,比值比-0.52,95%置信区间-0.94 至-0.29)。Take Care 组的 nCPAP 和 MV 的平均持续时间均显著缩短(P 值分别为<.006 和<.002)。接受 Take Care 技术治疗的婴儿支气管肺发育不良的发生率显著降低(相对风险-0.27,95%置信区间-0.1 至-0.72)。

结论

Take Care 技术对于极低出生体重儿呼吸窘迫综合征的治疗是可行的。它显著降低了 MV 的需求和持续时间,从而降低了早产儿支气管肺发育不良的发生率。

相似文献

1
Surfactant administration via thin catheter during spontaneous breathing: randomized controlled trial.经细导管在自主呼吸时给予表面活性剂:随机对照试验。
Pediatrics. 2013 Feb;131(2):e502-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0603. Epub 2013 Jan 28.
2
A multicenter, randomized, controlled trial of lucinactant versus poractant alfa among very premature infants at high risk for respiratory distress syndrome.一项关于卢西纳可坦与猪肺磷脂在极早早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征高危人群中进行的多中心、随机、对照试验。
Pediatrics. 2005 Apr;115(4):1030-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-2231.
3
Nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation after surfactant treatment for respiratory distress syndrome in preterm infants <30 weeks' gestation: a randomized, controlled trial.经表面活性物质治疗的早产儿呼吸窘迫综合征(胎龄<30 周)行鼻间歇正压通气:一项随机对照试验。
J Perinatol. 2012 May;32(5):336-43. doi: 10.1038/jp.2012.1. Epub 2012 Feb 2.
4
Surfactant without intubation in preterm infants with respiratory distress: first multi-center data.早产呼吸窘迫婴儿非插管使用表面活性剂:首个多中心数据
Klin Padiatr. 2010 Jan-Feb;222(1):13-7. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1241867. Epub 2010 Jan 18.
5
Early routine versus late selective surfactant in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome on nasal continuous positive airway pressure: a randomized controlled trial.经鼻持续气道正压通气治疗呼吸窘迫综合征的早产儿中早期常规与晚期选择性表面活性剂治疗的随机对照试验。
Neonatology. 2013;103(2):148-54. doi: 10.1159/000345198. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
6
Randomized trial comparing 3 approaches to the initial respiratory management of preterm neonates.比较三种早产儿初始呼吸管理方法的随机试验。
Pediatrics. 2011 Nov;128(5):e1069-76. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-3848. Epub 2011 Oct 24.
7
Thin catheter surfactant administration during spontaneous breathing in very low birth weight infants is associated with reduced need for mechanical ventilation.在极低出生体重儿自主呼吸期间给予细导管表面活性剂与机械通气需求减少有关。
J Pediatr. 2013 Sep;163(3):923-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.06.049.
8
Efficacy of a new technique - INtubate-RECruit-SURfactant-Extubate - "IN-REC-SUR-E" - in preterm neonates with respiratory distress syndrome: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.一种新技术——插管-复张-表面活性剂-拔管(“IN-REC-SUR-E”)用于呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿的疗效:一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2016 Aug 18;17:414. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1498-7.
9
Early or later prophylactic INSURE in preterm infants of less than 30 weeks' gestation.对孕周小于30周的早产儿尽早或适时进行预防性INSURE治疗。
Turk J Pediatr. 2015 Jan-Feb;57(1):1-8.
10
Prophylactic or early selective surfactant combined with nCPAP in very preterm infants.预防性或早期选择性表面活性剂联合 nCPAP 治疗极早产儿。
Pediatrics. 2010 Jun;125(6):e1402-9. doi: 10.1542/peds.2009-2131. Epub 2010 May 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy and Intubation-surfactant Administration-extubation in Premature Neonates with Respiratory Distress Syndrome.微创表面活性剂治疗与气管插管-表面活性剂给药-拔管用于治疗呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿的比较
Oman Med J. 2025 Mar 31;40(2):e730. doi: 10.5001/omj.2025.55. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Characterization of atomization and delivery efficiency of exogenous surfactant in preterm infant lungs using an ex vivo respiratory model.使用离体呼吸模型对早产婴儿肺部外源性表面活性剂的雾化及递送效率进行表征。
Sci Rep. 2025 May 29;15(1):18942. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-03199-x.
3
Comparative efficacy and safety of pulmonary surfactant delivery strategies in neonatal RDS: a network meta-analysis.
新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征中肺表面活性物质给药策略的比较疗效与安全性:一项网状Meta分析
BMC Pulm Med. 2024 Dec 30;24(1):637. doi: 10.1186/s12890-024-03429-4.
4
Application of a new type of double-lumen endotracheal tube in preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome: study protocol for a non-inferiority randomised controlled trial (NISA).新型双腔气管内导管在呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿中的应用:一项非劣效性随机对照试验(NISA)的研究方案
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 9;14(12):e083508. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083508.
5
Outcomes, safety and health economics of introduction of video laryngoscopy-assisted less invasive surfactant administration.视频喉镜辅助下微创表面活性剂给药的疗效、安全性及卫生经济学研究
J Perinatol. 2025 Apr;45(4):513-520. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-02162-4. Epub 2024 Nov 22.
6
Comparing the Effects of Two Surfactant Administration Methods: Minimally Invasive Surfactant Therapy (MIST) with Intubation (INSURE) in Infants with Respiratory Distress Syndrome.比较两种表面活性物质给药方法的效果:经鼻持续气道正压通气(NCPAP)联合微创肺表面活性物质(MIST)治疗与气管插管肺表面活性物质(INSURE)治疗新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征的效果比较。
Adv Respir Med. 2024 Oct 11;92(5):384-394. doi: 10.3390/arm92050036.
7
Do Different Amounts of Exogenous Surfactant Differently Influence Cerebrovascular Instability in a Consecutive Group of Preterm Babies? Preliminary Results from a Single-Center Experience.不同剂量的外源性表面活性剂对连续一组早产儿脑血管不稳定性的影响是否不同?单中心经验的初步结果。
Children (Basel). 2024 Sep 5;11(9):1088. doi: 10.3390/children11091088.
8
Less Invasive Surfactant Administration for Preterm Infants - State of the Art.经鼻给予早产儿表面活性物质治疗——最新进展。
Neonatology. 2024;121(5):584-595. doi: 10.1159/000540078. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
9
Feasibility and safety of surfactant administration via laryngeal mask airway as first-line therapy for a select newborn population: results of a standardized clinical protocol.通过喉罩气道给予表面活性剂作为特定新生儿群体一线治疗的可行性和安全性:一项标准化临床方案的结果
J Perinatol. 2025 Jan;45(1):36-42. doi: 10.1038/s41372-024-02099-8. Epub 2024 Aug 30.
10
Strategies for the prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia.预防支气管肺发育不良的策略。
Front Pediatr. 2024 Jul 24;12:1439265. doi: 10.3389/fped.2024.1439265. eCollection 2024.