Prevention Research Collaboration, School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, 2006, NSW, Australia.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2013 Jan 30;11:4. doi: 10.1186/1478-4505-11-4.
There is growing interest by funding bodies and researchers in assessing the impact of research on real world policy and practice. Population health monitoring surveys provide an important source of data on the prevalence and patterns of health problems, but few empirical studies have explored if and how such data is used to influence policy or practice decisions. Here we provide a case study analysis of how the findings from an Australian population monitoring survey series of children's weight and weight-related behaviors (Schools Physical Activity and Nutrition Survey (SPANS)) have been used, and the key facilitators and barriers to their utilization.
Data collection included semi-structured interviews with the chief investigators (n = 3) and end-users (n = 9) of SPANS data to explore if, how and under what circumstances the survey findings had been used, bibliometric analysis and verification using documentary evidence. Data analysis involved thematic coding of interview data and triangulation with other data sources to produce case summaries of policy and practice impacts for each of the three survey years (1997, 2004, 2010). Case summaries were then reviewed and discussed by the authors to distil key themes on if, how and why the SPANS findings had been used to guide policy and practice.
We found that the survey findings were used for agenda setting (raising awareness of issues), identifying areas and target groups for interventions, informing new policies, and supporting and justifying existing policies and programs across a range of sectors. Reported factors influencing use of the findings were: i) the perceived credibility of survey findings; ii) dissemination strategies used; and, iii) a range of contextual factors.
Using a novel approach, our case study provides important new insights into how and under what circumstances population health monitoring data can be used to influence real world policy and practice. The findings highlight the importance of population monitoring programs being conducted by independent credible agencies, researchers engaging end-users from the inception of survey programs and utilizing existing policy networks and structures, and using a range of strategies to disseminate the findings that go beyond traditional peer review publications.
资金机构和研究人员越来越关注评估研究对现实世界政策和实践的影响。人口健康监测调查为健康问题的流行和模式提供了重要的数据来源,但很少有实证研究探讨这些数据是否以及如何用于影响政策或实践决策。在这里,我们提供了一个案例研究分析,说明澳大利亚儿童体重和与体重相关行为的人口监测调查系列(学校体育活动和营养调查 (SPANS))的调查结果是如何被利用的,以及利用这些结果的主要促进因素和障碍。
数据收集包括对 SPANS 数据的首席调查员(n = 3)和最终用户(n = 9)进行半结构化访谈,以探讨调查结果是否、如何以及在什么情况下被利用,以及使用文献计量分析和文件证据进行验证。数据分析包括对访谈数据的主题编码,并与其他数据源进行三角分析,以生成每个调查年份(1997 年、2004 年、2010 年)的政策和实践影响的案例摘要。然后,作者对案例摘要进行审查和讨论,以提炼出有关 SPANS 调查结果是否、如何以及为何被用于指导政策和实践的主要主题。
我们发现,调查结果被用于议程设置(提高对问题的认识)、确定干预的领域和目标群体、为新政策提供信息,以及在一系列部门中支持和证明现有政策和计划。影响调查结果使用的报告因素包括:i)调查结果的可信度;ii)使用的传播策略;以及,iii)一系列背景因素。
通过一种新颖的方法,我们的案例研究提供了重要的新见解,说明人口健康监测数据如何以及在什么情况下可以用于影响现实世界的政策和实践。研究结果强调了由独立可信机构进行人口监测计划的重要性,研究人员从调查计划开始就与最终用户合作,并利用现有的政策网络和结构,以及使用一系列超越传统同行评审出版物的传播策略的重要性。