Suppr超能文献

综合训练与孤立训练对运动表现和神经肌肉控制的比较。

Comparison of integrated and isolated training on performance measures and neuromuscular control.

机构信息

Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.

出版信息

J Strength Cond Res. 2013 Apr;27(4):1083-90. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318280d40b.

Abstract

Traditional weight training programs use an exercise prescription strategy that emphasizes improving muscle strength through resistance exercises. Other factors, such as stability, endurance, movement quality, power, flexibility, speed, and agility are also essential elements to improving overall functional performance. Therefore, exercises that incorporate these additional elements may be beneficial additions to traditional resistance training programs. The purpose of the study was to compare the effects of an isolated resistance training program (ISO) and an integrated training program (INT) on movement quality, vertical jump height, agility, muscle strength and endurance, and flexibility. The ISO program consisted of primarily upper and lower extremity progressive resistance exercises. The INT program involved progressive resistance exercises, and core stability, power, and agility exercises. Thirty subjects were cluster randomized to either the ISO (n = 15) or INT (n = 15) training program. Each training group performed their respective programs 2 times per week for 8 weeks. The subjects were assessed before (pretest) and after (posttest) the intervention period using the following assessments: a jump-landing task graded using the Landing Error Scoring System (LESS), vertical jump height, T-test time, push-up and sit-up performance, and the sit-and-reach test. The INT group performed better on the LESS test (pretest: 3.90 ± 1.02, posttest: 3.03 ± 1.02; p = 0.02), faster on the T-test (pretest: 10.35 ± 1.20 seconds, posttest: 9.58 ± 1.02 seconds; p = 0.01), and completed more sit-ups (pretest: 40.20 ± 15.01, posttest: 46.73 ± 14.03; p = 0.045) and push-ups (pretest: 40.67 ± 13.85, posttest: 48.93 ± 15.17; p = 0.05) at posttest compared with pretest, and compared with the ISO group at posttest. Both groups performed more push-ups (p = 0.002), jumped higher (p < 0.001), and reached further (p = 0.008) at posttest compared with that at pretest. Performance enhancement programs should use an integrated approach to exercise selection to optimize performance and movement technique benefits.

摘要

传统的重量训练计划采用运动处方策略,强调通过抗阻运动来提高肌肉力量。其他因素,如稳定性、耐力、动作质量、力量、柔韧性、速度和敏捷性,也是提高整体功能表现的重要因素。因此,纳入这些附加元素的运动可能是传统抗阻训练计划的有益补充。本研究的目的是比较孤立抗阻训练计划(ISO)和综合训练计划(INT)对动作质量、垂直跳跃高度、敏捷性、肌肉力量和耐力以及柔韧性的影响。ISO 计划主要由上下肢渐进式抗阻运动组成。INT 计划包括渐进式抗阻运动以及核心稳定性、力量和敏捷性运动。30 名受试者按集群随机分为 ISO(n=15)或 INT(n=15)训练计划组。每个训练组每周进行 2 次,共 8 周。在干预前后(前测和后测),使用以下评估方法对受试者进行评估:跳跃着陆任务分级使用着陆错误评分系统(LESS)、垂直跳跃高度、T 测试时间、俯卧撑和仰卧起坐表现以及坐-触测试。INT 组在 LESS 测试中表现更好(前测:3.90±1.02,后测:3.03±1.02;p=0.02),T 测试更快(前测:10.35±1.20 秒,后测:9.58±1.02 秒;p=0.01),后测时完成的仰卧起坐(前测:40.20±15.01,后测:46.73±14.03;p=0.045)和俯卧撑(前测:40.67±13.85,后测:48.93±15.17;p=0.05)更多,并且与 ISO 组在后测时相比,前测时仰卧起坐(前测:40.20±15.01,后测:46.73±14.03;p=0.045)和俯卧撑(前测:40.67±13.85,后测:48.93±15.17;p=0.05)更多。与前测相比,两组在后测时的俯卧撑次数(p=0.002)、跳跃高度(p<0.001)和触及距离(p=0.008)均有所提高。表现提升计划应采用综合运动选择方法,以优化表现和动作技术收益。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验