Xiao Wensheng, Bu Te, Zhang Junlong, Cai Haogang, Zhu Wuyi, Bai Xiaorong, Zhang Lin, Geok Soh Kim
College of Physical Education, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China.
School of Physical Education, Huzhou University, Huzhou, China.
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil. 2025 Jan 3;17(1):2. doi: 10.1186/s13102-024-01040-y.
The evidence indicates that functional training is beneficial for athletes' physical and technical performance. However, a systematic review of the effects of functional training on athletes' physical and technical performance is lacking. Therefore, this study uses a literature synthesis approach to evaluate the impact of functional training on the physical and technical performance of the athletic population and to extend and deepen the existing body of knowledge.
This review followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, and the researchers performed a systematic search of five international electronic databases using the predefined terms "functional training" and "athletes" on 15th November 2023: Web of Science, CINAHL PLUS, PubMed, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus. A PICOS approach was used to identify the following inclusion criteria: (1) athletes, (2) a functional training program, (3) an active control group, (4) a measure of physical and/or technical performance, and (5) randomized controlled studies. A methodological quality assessment of the original research was conducted using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (Pedro) scale. The review was performed using the PRIMSA guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42022347943).
Of the 1059 potentially eligible studies identified, 28 studies met the inclusion criteria. The studies included were conducted on 819 athletes from 12 different countries and were published between 2011 and 2023. The assessment was performed on the Pedro scale, and the mean Pedro score for the included studies was 5.57 (moderate quality, ranging from 4 to 10). The eligibility study reported on 14 different types of sports, with 22 studies focusing on physical performance and 11 studies focusing on technical performance. These studies have shown that functional training can significantly improve the physical and technical performance of athlete populations, but in some studies, no significant difference in the data was observed between groups.
Functional training is an effective training method for enhancing the physical and technical performance of athlete populations. However, no significant difference in the data was observed between the functional training groups and the regular training group, which may be due to the duration of the training program, the different training experiences of the athletes, and the different focuses of the training regimens. Therefore, future studies should focus on the physical and technical performance of different sports groups with different types and durations of functional training programs to expand the current evidence base.
有证据表明,功能训练对运动员的身体和技术表现有益。然而,目前缺乏对功能训练对运动员身体和技术表现影响的系统评价。因此,本研究采用文献综合方法,评估功能训练对运动员群体身体和技术表现的影响,并扩展和深化现有知识体系。
本综述遵循系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目指南,研究人员于2023年11月15日使用预定义术语“功能训练”和“运动员”对五个国际电子数据库进行了系统检索:科学网、CINAHL PLUS、PubMed、Scopus和SPORTDiscus。采用PICOS方法确定以下纳入标准:(1)运动员;(2)功能训练计划;(3)积极对照组;(4)身体和/或技术表现的测量;(5)随机对照研究。使用物理治疗证据数据库(Pedro)量表对原始研究进行方法学质量评估。本综述按照PRIMSA指南进行,并在PROSPERO(ID:CRD42022347943)中注册。
在确定的1059项潜在符合条件的研究中,有28项研究符合纳入标准。纳入的研究涉及来自12个不同国家的819名运动员,发表时间为2011年至2023年。评估采用Pedro量表,纳入研究的平均Pedro评分为5.57(中等质量,范围为4至10)。符合条件的研究报告了14种不同类型的运动,其中22项研究关注身体表现,11项研究关注技术表现。这些研究表明,功能训练可以显著提高运动员群体的身体和技术表现,但在一些研究中,组间数据未观察到显著差异。
功能训练是提高运动员群体身体和技术表现的有效训练方法。然而,功能训练组与常规训练组之间的数据未观察到显著差异,这可能是由于训练计划的持续时间、运动员的不同训练经历以及训练方案的不同侧重点所致。因此,未来的研究应关注不同类型和持续时间的功能训练计划对不同运动群体的身体和技术表现,以扩大当前的证据基础。