Jung Minsoo
Center for Community-Based Research, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, and Department of Society, Human Development, and Health, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Health Care Manag (Frederick). 2013 Jan-Mar;32(1):52-7. doi: 10.1097/HCM.0b013e31827edbc0.
There has been little research on the concrete role of the press in discourses on AIDS. This study investigated the AIDS discourses created by the major media. In particular, from the perspective of the agenda-setting theory, it examines differences in the framing of AIDS-related news depending on the political orientation and news sources of the press. This study analyzed the thematic frames and news sources implied by AIDS-related coverage. The 2 major media representing conservatism and progressivism were selected as the objects of analysis. As for the search engine for content analysis, the Korean Integrated Newspaper Database System was used, and 151 articles containing "AIDS" or "HIV" over 5 years from January 2005 to December 2010 were analyzed. According to the results of the analysis, there were the 6 following frames: aid/support, accident, human rights, risk, prevention, and biomedicine. Whereas the conservative press in South Korea continued to frame AIDS in the traditional way, the progressive press tended relatively more often to attempt new agenda setting, from the perspective of human rights and inequality. However, both newspaper companies tended mostly to select experts as the sources of AIDS news, thus continuing to exclude infectees and civil and society organizations.
关于媒体在艾滋病议题讨论中所起的具体作用，相关研究较少。本研究调查了主要媒体所构建的艾滋病议题。具体而言，从议程设置理论的视角出发，考察了依据媒体的政治倾向和新闻来源，艾滋病相关新闻在框架构建上的差异。本研究分析了艾滋病相关报道所隐含的主题框架和新闻来源。选取了代表保守主义和进步主义的两大媒体作为分析对象。在内容分析的搜索引擎方面，使用了韩国综合报纸数据库系统，并对2005年1月至2010年12月这五年间包含“AIDS”或“HIV”的151篇文章进行了分析。根据分析结果，出现了以下六种框架：援助/支持、事故、人权、风险、预防和生物医学。韩国保守派媒体继续以传统方式构建艾滋病议题，而进步派媒体则相对更倾向于从人权和不平等的角度尝试新的议程设置。然而，两家报纸公司大多倾向于选择专家作为艾滋病新闻的来源，从而继续将感染者以及民间和社会组织排除在外。
