Department of Food Science and Nutrition, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
Nutr Cancer. 2013;65(1):1-16. doi: 10.1080/01635581.2013.741762.
Epidemiological studies regarding the associations of tea and coffee consumption with esophageal cancer (EC) risk are still inconsistent and this meta-analysis was conducted to examine these associations. PubMed, ISI -Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and Chinese VIP database up to October 2011 were searched and manual search for reference lists of relevant studies were conducted. Random effects model was used to pool the odds ratios (OR). Twenty-four case-control and cohort studies with 7376 EC cases were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled OR of EC was 0.77 [95% confidence intervals (95% CI): 0.57, 1.04] for highest vs. non/lowest green tea consumption; but it was statistically significant for case-control studies (OR = 0.70; 95% CI: 0.51, 0.96) and for studies conducted in China (OR = 0.64; 95% CI: 0.44, 0.95). No significant association was observed for the highest vs. non/lowest black tea consumption against EC risk (OR = 1.35; 95% CI: 0.86, 2.11). A borderline significantly inverse association of highest vs. non/lowest coffee consumption against EC risk was found (OR = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.76, 1.01). In conclusion, our data showed that both green tea and coffee consumption, but not black tea consumption, have protective effects on EC.
关于饮茶和咖啡与食管癌(EC)风险之间关联的流行病学研究结果仍不一致,因此进行了此项荟萃分析以检验这些关联。检索了 PubMed、ISI-Web of Science、中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)和中国 VIP 数据库,检索时间截至 2011 年 10 月,并对相关研究的参考文献进行了手工检索。使用随机效应模型对比值比(OR)进行汇总。该荟萃分析纳入了 24 项病例对照和队列研究,共计 7376 例 EC 病例。最高 vs. 非/最低绿茶消费的 EC 汇总 OR 为 0.77 [95%置信区间(95% CI):0.57, 1.04];但在病例对照研究中具有统计学意义(OR = 0.70;95% CI:0.51, 0.96),且在中国进行的研究中具有统计学意义(OR = 0.64;95% CI:0.44, 0.95)。最高 vs. 非/最低红茶消费与 EC 风险之间未见显著关联(OR = 1.35;95% CI:0.86, 2.11)。最高 vs. 非/最低咖啡消费与 EC 风险之间存在边缘显著的负相关(OR = 0.88;95% CI:0.76, 1.01)。总之,我们的数据表明,绿茶和咖啡消费均具有保护作用,可降低 EC 风险,但红茶消费无此作用。