• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[墨西哥城合法堕胎项目:医护人员的经历]

[Mexico City's Legal Abortion Program: health workers' experiences].

作者信息

Díaz-Olavarrieta Claudia, Cravioto Vanessa M, Villalobos Aremis, Deeb-Sossa Natalia, García Laura, García Sandra G

机构信息

Centro de Investigación en Salud Poblacional, Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública, México.

出版信息

Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2012 Dec;32(6):399-404.

PMID:23370182
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Identify the perceptions and opinions of people who provide abortion services in Mexico City, three years after implementation of elective abortion legal reforms.

METHODS

Nineteen in-depth interviews of health workers assigned to the legal abortion programs at a clinic and a hospital in Mexico's Federal District were carried out between February and June of 2010. Information on sociodemographic data, professional training, and experience in providing services was collected.

RESULTS

Some interviewees thought the provision of free services was beneficial because it allowed lower-income women to access this type of care, whereas others interviewed disapproved of the lack of fees, since other gynecological and obstetric health services have to be paid for. Conscientious objection prevailed among newly hired health workers, which can be attributed to their lack of knowledge about the legal abortion program's legal and technical guidelines. Some workers were ambivalent because they did not accept a postabortion contraception method used by some women, perceiving it to be a factor in significant repeated demand for legal abortion services.

CONCLUSIONS

Health workers evince divided and ambivalent opinions with regard to abortion rights. Analyzing their experiences and opinions will facilitate the creation of a baseline on the subject, and future studies will be able to document changes in and any lessening of approval for this law in Mexico.

摘要

目的

在选择性堕胎法律改革实施三年后,了解墨西哥城提供堕胎服务人员的看法和意见。

方法

2010年2月至6月间,对墨西哥联邦区一家诊所和一家医院中负责合法堕胎项目的19名卫生工作者进行了深入访谈。收集了有关社会人口数据、专业培训和服务提供经验的信息。

结果

一些受访者认为提供免费服务是有益的,因为这使低收入女性能够获得此类护理,而其他受访人员则不赞成不收费,因为其他妇产科保健服务是需要付费的。新雇用的卫生工作者中依良心拒服兵役的情况很普遍,这可归因于他们对合法堕胎项目的法律和技术指南缺乏了解。一些工作人员态度矛盾,因为他们不接受一些女性使用的堕胎后避孕方法,认为这是导致对合法堕胎服务大量反复需求的一个因素。

结论

卫生工作者对堕胎权利表现出分歧和矛盾的意见。分析他们的经历和意见将有助于建立该主题的基线,未来的研究将能够记录墨西哥对该法律的认可变化及认可程度的降低情况。

相似文献

1
[Mexico City's Legal Abortion Program: health workers' experiences].[墨西哥城合法堕胎项目:医护人员的经历]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2012 Dec;32(6):399-404.
2
"We don't want problems": reasons for denial of legal abortion based on conscientious objection in Mexico and Bolivia.“我们不希望有问题”:墨西哥和玻利维亚基于良心拒绝堕胎的理由。
Reprod Health. 2021 Feb 17;18(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01101-2.
3
Experiences and opinions of health-care professionals regarding legal abortion in Mexico City: a qualitative study.墨西哥城卫生保健专业人员对合法堕胎的经验和看法:一项定性研究。
Stud Fam Plann. 2011 Sep;42(3):183-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2011.00280.x.
4
Twelve years after abortion decriminalization in Mexico City: Can we still remain an island of liberties?墨西哥城堕胎非刑罪化 12 年后:我们还能继续保持自由的孤岛吗?
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jan;62:63-78. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2019.07.009. Epub 2019 Aug 1.
5
Quantifying disparities in access to public-sector abortion based on legislative differences within the Mexico City Metropolitan Area.基于墨西哥城大都市区立法差异量化公共部门堕胎机会获取方面的差异。
Contraception. 2019 Mar;99(3):160-164. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.11.012. Epub 2018 Nov 28.
6
Women's experiences with legal abortion in Mexico City: a qualitative study.墨西哥城女性对合法堕胎的体验:一项定性研究。
Stud Fam Plann. 2011 Sep;42(3):167-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1728-4465.2011.00278.x.
7
Clients' perceptions of the quality of care in Mexico city's public-sector legal abortion program.客户对墨西哥城公共部门合法堕胎计划护理质量的看法。
Int Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011 Dec;37(4):191-201. doi: 10.1363/3719111.
8
Challenges accessing legal abortion after rape in Mexico City.在墨西哥城,强奸案受害者获取合法堕胎面临的挑战。
Gac Med Mex. 2006 Sep-Oct;142 Suppl 2:85-9.
9
["The system is still precarious". Barriers in access to medical abortion: the experience of accompanying persons in three regions of Mexico].["该系统仍然不稳定"。药物流产获取方面的障碍:墨西哥三个地区陪同人员的经历]
Cad Saude Publica. 2022 Apr 29;38(4):ES124221. doi: 10.1590/0102-311XES124221. eCollection 2022.
10
[[Abortion, Stigma and Conscientious Objection: Experiences and Opinions of Gynecologists in Italy and Catalonia].].[堕胎、污名化与良心拒斥:意大利和加泰罗尼亚妇科医生的经历与观点]
Med Secoli. 2016;28(1):195-247.

引用本文的文献

1
What do medical students think about conscientious objection? A cross-sectional study from Turkey.医学生对良心拒服兵役有何看法?来自土耳其的一项横断面研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2025 Jan 2;25(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s12909-024-06599-1.
2
The microeconomics of abortion: A scoping review and analysis of the economic consequences for abortion care-seekers.堕胎的微观经济学:对堕胎寻求者的经济后果进行的范围界定审查和分析。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 9;16(6):e0252005. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252005. eCollection 2021.
3
"We don't want problems": reasons for denial of legal abortion based on conscientious objection in Mexico and Bolivia.
“我们不希望有问题”:墨西哥和玻利维亚基于良心拒绝堕胎的理由。
Reprod Health. 2021 Feb 17;18(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s12978-021-01101-2.
4
The mesoeconomics of abortion: A scoping review and analysis of the economic effects of abortion on health systems.流产的中观经济学:流产对卫生系统的经济影响的范围界定综述和分析。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 4;15(11):e0237227. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237227. eCollection 2020.
5
Abortion and conscientious objection: rethinking conflicting rights in the Mexican context.堕胎与良心拒服:墨西哥背景下对权利冲突的反思
Glob Bioeth. 2017 Dec 8;29(1):1-15. doi: 10.1080/11287462.2017.1411224. eCollection 2018.
6
Opinions on conscientious objection to induced abortion among Finnish medical and nursing students and professionals.芬兰医学和护理专业学生及从业人员对出于良心拒做人工流产的看法。
BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Mar 25;16:17. doi: 10.1186/s12910-015-0012-1.