Department of Medicine and Biosystemic Sciences, Kyushu University Graduate School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan.
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054190. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
Our unit adopted the single administration of cefepime as the initial treatment for febrile episodes in neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies. However, recently, cefepime-resistant gram-negative bacteremia, including those with extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producers, was frequently observed in these patients. Therefore, we instituted a rotation of primary antibiotics for febrile neutropenic patients in an attempt to control antibiotic resistance.
This prospective trial was performed from August 2008 through March 2011 at our unit. After a pre-intervention period, in which cefepime was used as the initial agent for febrile neutropenia, 4 primary antibiotics, namely, piperacillin-tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, meropenem, and cefepime, were rotated at 1-month intervals over 20 months. Blood and surveillance cultures were conducted for febrile episodes, in order to assess the etiology, the resistance pattern (particularly to cefepime), and the prognosis.
In this trial, 219 patients were registered. A 65.9% reduction in the use of cefepime occurred after the antibiotic rotation. In the surveillance stool cultures, the detection rate of cefepime-resistant gram-negative isolates, of which ESBL-producers were predominant, declined significantly after the intervention (8.5 vs 0.9 episodes per 1000 patient days before and after intervention respectively, P<0.01). Interestingly, ESBL-related bacteremia was not detected after the initiation of the trial (1.7 vs 0.0 episodes per 1000 patient days before and after intervention respectively, P<0.01). Infection-related mortality was comparable between the 2 periods.
We implemented a monthly rotation of primary antibiotics for febrile neutropenic patients. An antibiotic heterogeneity strategy, mainly performed as a cycling regimen, would be useful for controlling antimicrobial resistance among patients treated for febrile neutropenia.
我们科室最初采用头孢吡肟单药治疗血液恶性肿瘤中性粒细胞减少症患者的发热。然而,近期我们观察到此类患者中频繁出现头孢吡肟耐药的革兰氏阴性菌血症,包括产超广谱β-内酰胺酶(ESBL)的菌株。因此,我们尝试为发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者更换主要抗生素,以控制抗生素耐药性。
本前瞻性试验于 2008 年 8 月至 2011 年 3 月在我院进行。在前期干预阶段,我们使用头孢吡肟作为发热性中性粒细胞减少症的初始药物,然后在 20 个月的时间内,每隔 1 个月更换 4 种主要抗生素,即哌拉西林他唑巴坦、环丙沙星、美罗培南和头孢吡肟。我们对发热发作进行血培养和监测培养,以评估病因、耐药模式(尤其是对头孢吡肟)和预后。
本试验共登记了 219 例患者。抗生素轮换后,头孢吡肟的使用率降低了 65.9%。在监测粪便培养中,干预后头孢吡肟耐药的革兰氏阴性分离株(以产 ESBL 为主)的检出率显著下降(分别为干预前和干预后每 1000 个患者日 0.9 例和 0.0 例,P<0.01)。有趣的是,试验开始后未检出 ESBL 相关菌血症(分别为干预前和干预后每 1000 个患者日 0.0 例和 0.0 例,P<0.01)。两个时期的感染相关死亡率相似。
我们对发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者采用每月更换主要抗生素的策略。抗生素异质性策略,主要通过轮替方案实施,可能有助于控制发热性中性粒细胞减少症患者的抗菌药物耐药性。