Suppr超能文献

综合旁路风险评估(CRAB)有助于对临界肢体缺血患者进行有效的围手术期风险评估。

The Comprehensive Risk Assessment for Bypass (CRAB) facilitates efficient perioperative risk assessment for patients with critical limb ischemia.

机构信息

Vascular Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2013 May;57(5):1186-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.09.083. Epub 2013 Jan 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Specific perioperative risk assessment models have been developed for bariatric, pancreatic, and colorectal surgery. A similar instrument, specific for patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI), could improve patient-centered clinical decision making. We describe a novel tool to predict 30-day major morbidity and mortality (M&M) after bypass surgery for CLI.

METHODS

Data for 4985 individuals from the 2007 to 2009 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were used to develop and internally validate the model. Outcome measures included mortality, major morbidity, and a composite end point (M&M). M&M included mortality and the most severe postoperative morbidities that were highly associated with death (eg, sepsis and major cardiopulmonary complications). More than 30 preoperative factors were tested for association with 30-day mortality, major morbidity, and M&M. Significant predictors in multivariate models were assigned integer values (points), which were added to calculate a patient's Comprehensive Risk Assessment For Bypass (CRAB) score. Performance was assessed (C-index) across all outcome measures and compared with other general tools (American Society of Anesthesiologists class, Surgical Risk Scale) and existing CLI-specific survival prediction models (Finnvasc score, Edifoligide for the Prevention of Infrainguinal Vein Graft Failure [PREVENT III] score) on a distinct validation sample (n = 1620).

RESULTS

In the derivation data set (n = 3275), the 30-day mortality rate was 2.9%. The rate of any major morbidity was 19.1%. The composite end point M&M occurred in 10.1%. Significant predictors of M&M by multivariate analysis included age >75 years, prior amputation or revascularization, tissue loss, dialysis dependence, severe cardiac disease, emergency operation, and functional dependence. Applied to a distinct validation sample of 1620 patients, higher CRAB scores were significantly associated with higher rates of mortality, all major morbidities, and M&M (P < .0001). Comparison with other models by assessment of area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve revealed the CRAB was a more accurate predictor of mortality, all major morbidity, and M&M.

CONCLUSIONS

The CRAB is a CLI-specific, risk assessment instrument derived from multi-institutional American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program surgical outcomes data that out-performs existing prognostic risk indices in the prediction of clinically significant adverse events after bypass surgery. Use of the CRAB as a risk assessment tool provides an evidence basis for patient-centered clinical decision making and may have a role in identifying patients at higher risk for surgical revascularization in whom an endovascular approach is preferable.

摘要

目的

针对减重、胰腺和结直肠手术,已经开发出了特定的围手术期风险评估模型。对于严重肢体缺血(CLI)患者,类似的特定工具可以改善以患者为中心的临床决策。我们描述了一种预测 CLI 患者旁路手术后 30 天主要发病率和死亡率(M&M)的新工具。

方法

使用 2007 年至 2009 年美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划的 4985 名个体的数据来开发和内部验证该模型。结果测量包括死亡率、主要发病率和复合终点(M&M)。M&M 包括死亡率和与死亡高度相关的最严重术后并发症(如败血症和主要心肺并发症)。对 30 多个术前因素进行了与 30 天死亡率、主要发病率和 M&M 的相关性测试。在多变量模型中,有意义的预测因素被赋予整数(点)值,这些值被相加以计算患者的综合旁路风险评估(CRAB)评分。使用独特的验证样本(n=1620),评估了所有结局指标的性能(C 指数),并与其他一般工具(美国麻醉医师学会分级、手术风险评分)和现有的 CLI 特定生存预测模型(Finnvasc 评分、Edifoligide 预防下肢静脉旁路移植失败[PREVENT III]评分)进行了比较。

结果

在推导数据集中(n=3275),30 天死亡率为 2.9%。任何主要发病率的发生率为 19.1%。复合终点 M&M 的发生率为 10.1%。多变量分析的 M&M 显著预测因素包括年龄>75 岁、既往截肢或血运重建、组织丢失、透析依赖、严重心脏疾病、急症手术和功能依赖。应用于 1620 例独特的验证样本,较高的 CRAB 评分与更高的死亡率、所有主要发病率和 M&M 发生率显著相关(P<0.0001)。通过评估受试者工作特征曲线下面积与其他模型进行比较,结果表明 CRAB 是一种更准确的死亡率、所有主要发病率和 M&M 的预测指标。

结论

CRAB 是一种 CLI 特异性的风险评估工具,源自美国外科医师学会国家手术质量改进计划的多机构手术结果数据,在预测旁路手术后临床显著不良事件方面优于现有的预后风险指数。使用 CRAB 作为风险评估工具为以患者为中心的临床决策提供了证据基础,并可能有助于识别手术血运重建风险较高的患者,此类患者更适合采用血管内治疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验