Department of Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Am J Cardiol. 2013 Apr 15;111(8):1175-9. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.12.051. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
Current guidelines recommend an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) according to the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, they do not mandate volumetric LVEF assessment. We sought to determine whether volumetric LVEF measurement using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR-LVEF) is superior to conventional LVEF measurement using 2-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography (Echo-LVEF) for risk stratifying patients referred for primary prevention ICD. Patients who underwent primary prevention ICD implantation at our institution and had undergone preimplantation CMR-LVEF from November 2001 to February 2011 were identified. Volumetric CMR-LVEF was determined from cine short-axis data sets. CMR-LVEF and Echo-LVEF were extracted from the clinical reports. The end point was appropriate ICD discharge (shock and/or antitachycardia pacing). Of 48 patients, appropriate ICD discharge occurred in 9 (19%) within 29 ± 25 months (range 1 to 99, median 20). All patients met the Echo-LVEF criteria for ICD implantation; however 25% (95% confidence interval 13% to 37%) did not meet the CMR-LVEF criteria. None (0%) of these latter patients had received an appropriate ICD discharge. Using CMR-LVEF ≤30% as a threshold for ICD eligibility, 19 patients (40%) with a qualifying Echo-LVEF would not have been referred for ICD, and none (0%) received an ICD discharge.For primary prevention ICD implantation, volumetric CMR-LVEF might be superior to clinical Echo-LVEF for risk stratification and can identify a large minority of subjects in whom ICD implantation can be safely avoided. In conclusion, if confirmed by larger prospective series, volumetric methods such as CMR should be considered a superior "gatekeeper" for the identification of patients likely to benefit from primary prevention ICD implantation.
目前的指南建议根据左心室射血分数(LVEF)植入植入式心脏复律除颤器(ICD)。然而,它们并不强制要求进行容积 LVEF 评估。我们旨在确定使用心血管磁共振成像(CMR-LVEF)进行容积 LVEF 测量是否优于使用二维经胸超声心动图(Echo-LVEF)进行常规 LVEF 测量,以对接受一级预防 ICD 的患者进行风险分层。确定了 2001 年 11 月至 2011 年 2 月期间在我院接受一级预防 ICD 植入术且植入前接受 CMR-LVEF 的患者。从电影短轴数据集确定容积 CMR-LVEF。从临床报告中提取 CMR-LVEF 和 Echo-LVEF。终点是适当的 ICD 放电(电击和/或抗心动过速起搏)。在 48 名患者中,在 29 ± 25 个月(范围 1 至 99,中位数 20)内,有 9 名(19%)发生了适当的 ICD 放电。所有患者均符合 ICD 植入的 Echo-LVEF 标准;然而,25%(95%置信区间 13%至 37%)不符合 CMR-LVEF 标准。这些患者中没有一个(0%)接受了适当的 ICD 放电。使用 CMR-LVEF ≤30%作为 ICD 合格的阈值,19 名(40%)具有合格 Echo-LVEF 的患者不会被转介进行 ICD,并且没有患者(0%)接受 ICD 放电。对于一级预防 ICD 植入,容积 CMR-LVEF 可能优于临床 Echo-LVEF 进行风险分层,并可以识别出大多数可以安全避免 ICD 植入的患者。总之,如果被更大的前瞻性系列证实,CMR 等容积方法应被视为确定可能从一级预防 ICD 植入中获益的患者的更好的“守门员”。