• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

颈动脉粥样硬化的高分辨率磁共振成像可识别易损颈动脉斑块。

High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of carotid atherosclerosis identifies vulnerable carotid plaques.

机构信息

Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Lyon, Lyon, France.

出版信息

J Vasc Surg. 2013 Apr;57(4):1046-1051.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.10.088. Epub 2013 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1016/j.jvs.2012.10.088
PMID:23375613
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Carotid magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may be a useful tool in characterizing carotid plaque vulnerability, but large studies are still lacking. The purpose of this study was to assess carotid MRI features of vulnerable plaque in a large study and the changes in carotid plaque morphology with respect to time since the neurological event.

METHODS

We included 161 patients with carotid plaque more than 3 mm thick. All patients underwent carotid MRI to obtain 3-T high-resolution magnetic resonance sequences. Large lipid core, intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), fibrous cap rupture (FCR), and gadolinium enhancement (GE) were assessed and classified as present or absent. Prevalences of these features were then compared between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients and time since stroke.

RESULTS

Seven patients were excluded because of poor image quality. Of the remaining 154 patients, 52 were symptomatic and 102 were asymptomatic. The prevalences of IPH (39 vs 16%; P = .002), FCR (30 vs 9%; P = .001), and GE (75 vs 55%; P = .015) were significantly higher in symptomatic than asymptomatic patients. After multivariate analysis, the prevalences of IPH (odds ratio, 2.6; P = .023) and FCR (odds ratio, 2.8; P = .038) were still significantly higher. The prevalence of IPH was significantly higher in symptomatic patients with plaque regardless of the time since the neurological event. For FCR, the difference between symptomatic and asymptomatic patients was significant only during the first 15 days after the neurological event.

CONCLUSIONS

Carotid MRI can identify plaque features that are associated with symptomatic presentation and may be indicative of plaque vulnerability. These features may ultimately be used in the management of extracranial carotid stenosis.

摘要

目的

颈动脉磁共振成像(MRI)可能是一种有用的工具,可用于表征颈动脉斑块的易损性,但仍缺乏大型研究。本研究的目的是在大型研究中评估易损斑块的颈动脉 MRI 特征,并评估颈动脉斑块形态随时间推移而发生的变化。

方法

我们纳入了 161 例颈动脉斑块厚度大于 3 毫米的患者。所有患者均接受颈动脉 MRI 检查,以获取 3-T 高分辨率磁共振序列。评估并分类存在或不存在大脂质核心、斑块内出血(IPH)、纤维帽破裂(FCR)和钆增强(GE)。然后比较有症状和无症状患者以及中风后时间之间这些特征的患病率。

结果

7 例患者因图像质量差而被排除。在剩余的 154 例患者中,52 例有症状,102 例无症状。有症状患者的 IPH(39%比 16%;P =.002)、FCR(30%比 9%;P =.001)和 GE(75%比 55%;P =.015)的患病率明显高于无症状患者。多变量分析后,IPH(比值比,2.6;P =.023)和 FCR(比值比,2.8;P =.038)的患病率仍然明显较高。无论神经事件发生多久,有症状患者的 IPH 患病率明显更高。对于 FCR,仅在神经事件发生后的头 15 天内,有症状和无症状患者之间存在差异。

结论

颈动脉 MRI 可以识别与有症状表现相关的斑块特征,这些特征可能表明斑块的脆弱性。这些特征最终可能用于治疗颅外颈动脉狭窄。

相似文献

1
High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging of carotid atherosclerosis identifies vulnerable carotid plaques.颈动脉粥样硬化的高分辨率磁共振成像可识别易损颈动脉斑块。
J Vasc Surg. 2013 Apr;57(4):1046-1051.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.10.088. Epub 2013 Feb 1.
2
Validity of dual MRI and F-FDG PET imaging in predicting vulnerable and inflamed carotid plaque.双重 MRI 和 F-FDG PET 成像在预测易损和炎症颈动脉斑块中的有效性。
Cerebrovasc Dis. 2013;35(4):370-7. doi: 10.1159/000348846. Epub 2013 Apr 30.
3
High-resolution MRI of carotid plaque with a neurovascular coil and contrast-enhanced MR angiography: one-stop shopping for the comprehensive assessment of carotid atherosclerosis.神经血管线圈高分辨率 MRI 联合对比增强磁共振血管成像在颈动脉粥样硬化全面评估中的一站式应用。
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011 May;196(5):1164-71. doi: 10.2214/AJR.10.4751.
4
Carotid plaques in transient ischemic attack and stroke patients: one-year follow-up study by magnetic resonance imaging.短暂性脑缺血发作和脑卒中患者的颈动脉斑块:磁共振成像的一年随访研究。
Invest Radiol. 2010 Dec;45(12):803-9. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0b013e3181ed15ff.
5
Features of unstable carotid plaque during and after the hyperacute period following TIA/stroke.短暂性脑缺血发作/中风后的超急性期内及之后不稳定颈动脉斑块的特征。
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2013 Feb;45(2):114-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2012.11.023. Epub 2012 Dec 25.
6
Microvasculature and intraplaque hemorrhage in atherosclerotic carotid lesions: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging study.动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉斑块中的微血管和斑块内出血:心血管磁共振成像研究。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2019 Mar 4;21(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12968-019-0524-9.
7
Relationships between recent intraplaque hemorrhage and stroke risk factors in patients with carotid stenosis: the HIRISC study.颈动脉狭窄患者近期斑块内出血与卒中危险因素的关系:HIRISC 研究。
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012 Feb;32(2):492-9. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.239335. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
8
Contemporary carotid imaging: from degree of stenosis to plaque vulnerability.当代颈动脉成像:从狭窄程度到斑块易损性
J Neurosurg. 2016 Jan;124(1):27-42. doi: 10.3171/2015.1.JNS142452. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
9
Differences of signal evolution of intraplaque hemorrhage and associated stenosis between symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerotic carotid arteries: an in vivo high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging follow-up study.易损斑块内出血及其相关狭窄在症状性和无症状性颈动脉粥样硬化中的信号演变差异:一项活体高分辨率磁共振成像随访研究。
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010 Dec;26(Suppl 2):323-32. doi: 10.1007/s10554-010-9686-0. Epub 2010 Aug 21.
10
Comparison of symptomatic and asymptomatic atherosclerotic carotid plaques using parallel imaging and 3 T black-blood in vivo CMR.使用并行成像和3T黑血磁共振成像对有症状和无症状动脉粥样硬化颈动脉斑块进行体内比较。
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 May 24;15(1):44. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-15-44.

引用本文的文献

1
Residual Inflammatory Risk and Intracranial Atherosclerosis Plaque Vulnerability: Insights From High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging.残余炎症风险与颅内动脉粥样硬化斑块易损性:来自高分辨率磁共振成像的见解
J Stroke. 2025 May;27(2):207-216. doi: 10.5853/jos.2024.03251. Epub 2025 May 31.
2
Additive value of perivascular fat density to CT angiography characteristics of carotid plaques in predicting symptomatic carotid plaques.血管周围脂肪密度对颈动脉斑块CT血管造影特征在预测有症状颈动脉斑块方面的附加价值。
Eur Radiol. 2025 Jun 3. doi: 10.1007/s00330-025-11713-y.
3
Histological validation of three-dimensional variable flip angle turbo spin echo multi-contrast magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging in characterizing carotid vulnerable atherosclerotic plaques.
三维可变翻转角涡轮自旋回波多对比磁共振血管壁成像在颈动脉易损动脉粥样硬化斑块特征描述中的组织学验证
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2024;26(2):101112. doi: 10.1016/j.jocmr.2024.101112. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
4
Diagnostics Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detection of Atherosclerotic Plaque Characteristics in Carotid Arteries Compared to Histology: A Systematic Review.与组织学相比,磁共振成像检测颈动脉粥样硬化斑块特征的诊断准确性:一项系统评价。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2025 Mar;61(3):1067-1093. doi: 10.1002/jmri.29522. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
5
Risk prediction of CISS classification in endovascular treatment of basilar artery stenosis.基底动脉狭窄血管内治疗中CISS分型的风险预测
Heliyon. 2023 Dec 16;10(1):e23747. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e23747. eCollection 2024 Jan 15.
6
Combined near infrared photoacoustic imaging and ultrasound detects vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque.联合近红外光声成像和超声检测易损性动脉粥样硬化斑块。
Biomaterials. 2023 Nov;302:122314. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.122314. Epub 2023 Sep 11.
7
Computed tomography angiography-based radiomics model to identify high-risk carotid plaques.基于计算机断层扫描血管造影的放射组学模型用于识别高危颈动脉斑块。
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Sep 1;13(9):6089-6104. doi: 10.21037/qims-23-158. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
8
The Role of High-Resolution Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Cerebrovascular Disease: A Narrative Review.高分辨率磁共振成像在脑血管疾病中的作用:一篇叙述性综述。
Brain Sci. 2023 Apr 18;13(4):677. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13040677.
9
Differences in left and right carotid plaque vulnerability in patients with bilateral carotid plaques: a CARE-II study.双侧颈动脉斑块患者颈动脉左右斑块易损性的差异:一项 CARE-II 研究。
Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2023 Aug;8(4):284-291. doi: 10.1136/svn-2022-001937. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
10
Relation of Carotid Plaque Features Detected with Ultrasonography-Based Radiomics to Clinical Symptoms.基于超声放射组学检测的颈动脉斑块特征与临床症状的关系。
Transl Stroke Res. 2022 Dec;13(6):970-982. doi: 10.1007/s12975-021-00963-9. Epub 2021 Nov 6.