Suppr超能文献

颈动脉狭窄患者近期斑块内出血与卒中危险因素的关系:HIRISC 研究。

Relationships between recent intraplaque hemorrhage and stroke risk factors in patients with carotid stenosis: the HIRISC study.

机构信息

Department of Neurology; Hôpital Sainte-Anne, 1 rue Cabanis, 75014 Paris, France.

出版信息

Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2012 Feb;32(2):492-9. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.111.239335. Epub 2011 Nov 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) is an emerging marker of plaque instability. However, little is known about the relationships between IPH and traditional risk factors and whether these relationships differ between symptomatic and asymptomatic disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-four patients with symptomatic (n=114) or asymptomatic (n=120) carotid stenosis underwent high-resolution plaque magnetic resonance imaging. Seventy-five patients had recent IPH (symptomatic, 33%; asymptomatic, 31%). In symptomatic stenosis, recent IPH was independently associated with degree of stenosis (odds ratio [OR]=4.21, 1.61-10.98 for North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial >35%; OR=2.92, 1.18-7.24 for European Carotid Surgery Trial >60%), qualifying event (OR=4.13; 1.11-15.32 for stroke or hemispheric transient ischemic attack ≥1 hour versus transient ischemic attack <1 hour or ocular symptoms), time from ischemic event (OR=6.65, 1.56-28.35 for ≤2 weeks; OR=2.24, 0.87-5.81 for 2-12 weeks versus >12 weeks; P for trend=0.03). In asymptomatic stenosis, IPH was only associated with stenosis severity >70% by ECST (OR=6.65; 1.95-22.73) but not by the NASCET method.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the potential link between recent IPH and risk of ipsilateral stroke in symptomatic disease but also imply that prognostic studies should adjust for known stroke risk factors in multivariate analyses. In asymptomatic stenosis, the potential predictive value of recent IPH is less likely to be confounded by stroke risk factors.

摘要

目的

斑块内出血(IPH)是斑块不稳定的一个新兴标志物。然而,人们对 IPH 与传统危险因素之间的关系知之甚少,也不清楚这些关系在有症状和无症状疾病之间是否存在差异。

方法和结果

234 例有症状(n=114)或无症状(n=120)颈动脉狭窄患者接受了高分辨率斑块磁共振成像检查。75 例患者近期有 IPH(有症状者占 33%,无症状者占 31%)。在有症状的狭窄中,近期 IPH 与狭窄程度独立相关(比值比[OR]为北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验>35%时为 4.21[1.61-10.98];OR 为欧洲颈动脉手术试验>60%时为 2.92[1.18-7.24])、发病事件(OR 为 4.13[1.11-15.32],缺血性事件≥1 小时的中风或半球性短暂性脑缺血发作与缺血性事件<1 小时或眼部症状的短暂性脑缺血发作相比)和缺血性事件发生后的时间(OR 为≤2 周时为 6.65[1.56-28.35];OR 为 2-12 周时为 2.24[0.87-5.81],与>12 周相比;P 趋势=0.03)。在无症状狭窄中,IPH 仅与 ECST >70%的狭窄程度相关(OR=6.65[1.95-22.73]),与 NASCET 方法无关。

结论

我们的研究结果支持近期 IPH 与有症状疾病同侧中风风险之间的潜在联系,但也暗示预后研究应在多变量分析中调整已知的中风危险因素。在无症状狭窄中,近期 IPH 的潜在预测价值不太可能受到中风危险因素的混淆。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验