Biogeography Department, Faculty of Geography/Geosciences, Trier University, Universitätsring 15, 54296 Trier, Germany.
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol. 2013 Jul;65(1):98-104. doi: 10.1007/s00244-013-9873-9. Epub 2013 Feb 2.
Pesticide residues in breeding ponds can cause avoidance by at least some amphibian species. So far, outdoor experiments have been performed only with artificial pools in areas where the focus species usually occur and new colonization has been observed. Results of this kind of study are potentially influenced by natural disturbances and therefore are of limited comparability. We used an easily manufactured and standardizable arena approach, in which animals in reproductive condition for some hours had a choice among pools with different concentrations of a contaminant. Because there has been much debate on the potential environmental impacts of glyphosate-based herbicides, we investigated the impact of glyphosate isopropylamine salt (GLY-IS), Roundup LB PLUS (RU-LB-PLUS), and glyphosate's main metabolite aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) on individual residence time in water. The following European amphibian species were tested: Common frog (Rana temporaria), Palmate newt (Lissotriton helveticus), and Alpine newt (Ichthyosaura alpestris). The residence time in water was not significantly affected by concentrations below or slightly above the European Environmental Quality Standards for AMPA or the German "worst-case" expected environmental concentrations for GLY-IS and RU-LB-PLUS. Occasionally, microclimatic cofactors (nightly minimum ground temperature, water temperature) apparently influenced the residence time. The major drawback of such quick behavior studies is that results can only be transferred to perception and avoidance of contaminated water but not easily to site selection by amphibians. For example, testing oviposition site selection requires more natural water bodies and more time. Hence, to develop a standard procedure in risk assessment, an intermediate design between an arena approach, as presented here, and previously performed field studies should be tested.
养殖池塘中的农药残留至少会使某些两栖动物物种回避。到目前为止,仅在通常出现重点物种的地区的人工池塘中进行了户外实验,并且观察到了新的殖民化。这种研究的结果可能会受到自然干扰的影响,因此可比性有限。我们使用了一种易于制造和标准化的竞技场方法,在这种方法中,处于繁殖状态数小时的动物可以在具有不同浓度污染物的池塘之间进行选择。由于关于草甘膦基除草剂的潜在环境影响存在很多争议,因此我们研究了草甘膦异丙胺盐(GLY-IS),Roundup LB PLUS(RU-LB-PLUS)和草甘膦主要代谢物氨甲基膦酸(AMPA)对个体在水中停留时间的影响。测试了以下欧洲两栖物种:普通青蛙(Rana temporaria),掌状蝾螈(Lissotriton helveticus)和高山蝾螈(Ichthyosaura alpestris)。在低于或略高于欧洲 AMPA 环境质量标准或德国“最坏情况”预期环境浓度的浓度下,水中的停留时间没有明显受到影响GLY-IS 和 RU-LB-PLUS。偶尔,微气候协因子(夜间最低地面温度,水温和)显然会影响停留时间。这种快速行为研究的主要缺点是,结果只能转移到对受污染水的感知和回避上,而不能轻易转移到两栖动物对产卵地点的选择上。例如,测试产卵地点选择需要更多的天然水体和更多的时间。因此,为了在风险评估中开发标准程序,应测试一种介于这里提出的竞技场方法和以前进行的现场研究之间的中间设计。