Hains Carrie-Anne Marie, Hulbert-Williams Nicholas J
Department of Psychology, University of Chester, , Chester, UK.
J Med Ethics. 2013 Nov;39(11):713-6. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-100729. Epub 2013 Feb 2.
Public and healthcare professionals differ in their attitudes towards euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide (PAS), the legal status of which is currently in the spotlight in the UK. In addition to medical training and experience, religiosity, locus of control and patient characteristics (eg, patient age, pain levels, number of euthanasia requests) are known influencing factors. Previous research tends toward basic designs reporting on attitudes in the context of just one or two potentially influencing factors; we aimed to test the comparative importance of a larger range of variables in a sample of nursing trainees and non-nursing controls. One hundred and fifty-one undergraduate students (early-stage nursing training, late-stage nursing training and non-nursing controls) were approached on a UK university campus and asked to complete a self-report questionnaire. Participants were of mixed gender and were on average 25.5 years old. No significant differences in attitude were found between nursing and non-nursing students. There was a significant positive correlation between higher religiosity and positive attitude toward euthanasia (r=0.19, p<0.05) and a significant negative relationship between internal locus of control and positive attitude toward PAS (r=-0.263, p<0.01). Multivariate analyses revealed differing predictor models for attitudes towards euthanasia and PAS, and confirm the importance of individual differences in determining these attitudes. The unexpected direction of association between religiosity and attitudes may reflect a broader cultural shift in attitudes since earlier research in this area. Furthermore, these findings suggest it possible that experience, more than training itself, may be a bigger influence on attitudinal differences in healthcare professionals.
公众和医疗保健专业人员对安乐死和医生协助自杀(PAS)的态度有所不同,目前在英国,其法律地位备受关注。除了医学培训和经验外,宗教信仰、控制源和患者特征(如患者年龄、疼痛程度、安乐死请求数量)都是已知的影响因素。以往的研究倾向于采用基本设计,仅在一两个潜在影响因素的背景下报告态度;我们旨在测试更多变量在护理实习生和非护理对照组样本中的相对重要性。在英国大学校园里,我们接触了151名本科生(早期护理培训、后期护理培训和非护理对照组),并要求他们完成一份自我报告问卷。参与者性别混合,平均年龄为25.5岁。护理专业和非护理专业学生在态度上未发现显著差异。较高的宗教信仰与对安乐死的积极态度之间存在显著正相关(r = 0.19,p < 0.05),而内控点与对PAS的积极态度之间存在显著负相关(r = -0.263,p < 0.01)。多变量分析揭示了对安乐死和PAS态度的不同预测模型,并证实了个体差异在决定这些态度方面的重要性。宗教信仰与态度之间关联的意外方向可能反映了自该领域早期研究以来态度上更广泛的文化转变。此外,这些发现表明,经验可能比培训本身对医疗保健专业人员的态度差异影响更大。