Suppr超能文献

护士上门访视加或不加报警按钮与常规护理在体弱老年人中的应用:一项随机对照试验。

Nurse home visits with or without alert buttons versus usual care in the frail elderly: a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Center for Scientific Research and Higher Education of Ensenada, Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico.

出版信息

Clin Interv Aging. 2013;8:85-95. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S38618. Epub 2013 Jan 23.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether an intervention based on nurse home visits including alert buttons (NV+AB) is effective in reducing frailty compared to nurse home visits alone (NV-only) and usual care (control group) for older adults.

DESIGN

Unblinded, randomized, controlled trial.

SETTING

Insured population covered by the Mexican Social Security Institute living in the city of Ensenada, Baja California, Mexico.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients were aged over 60 years with a frailty index score higher than 0.14.

INTERVENTION

After screening and informed consent, participants were allocated randomly to the control, NV+AB, or NV-only groups.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was the frailty score 9 months later. Quality of life, depression, comorbidities, health status, and health service utilization were also considered.

RESULTS

The framing sample included 819 patients. Of those, 591 were not located because they did not have a landline/telephone (341 patients), they had died (107), they were ill (50), or they were not currently living in the city (28). A screening interview was applied to 228 participants, and 57 had a score ≤0.14, 171 had ≥0.14, and 16 refused to complete the baseline questionnaire. A home visit was scheduled for 155 patients. However, 22 did not complete the baseline questionnaire. The final 133 subjects were randomized into the NV+AB (n = 45), NV-only (n = 44), and control (n = 44) groups. There were no statistically significant differences in the baseline characteristics of the groups. The mean age overall was 76.3 years (standard deviation 4.7) and 45% were men. At the baseline, 61.65% were classified as frail. At end of follow-up the adjusted prevalence of frailty in NV+AB group was 23.3% versus 58.3% in the control group.

CONCLUSION

An intervention based on NV+AB seems to have a positive effect on frailty scores.

摘要

目的

评估基于护士家访的干预措施(包括警报按钮[NV+AB])与单独的护士家访(NV 仅)和常规护理(对照组)相比,对老年人衰弱的影响。

设计

非盲、随机对照试验。

地点

居住在墨西哥下加利福尼亚州恩塞纳达市的墨西哥社会保险研究所覆盖的参保人群。

参与者

患者年龄在 60 岁以上,衰弱指数评分高于 0.14。

干预措施

经过筛选和知情同意,参与者被随机分配到对照组、NV+AB 组或 NV 仅组。

测量

主要结局是 9 个月后的衰弱评分。还考虑了生活质量、抑郁、合并症、健康状况和卫生服务利用情况。

结果

纳入的样本量为 819 例患者。其中,591 例因未安装固定电话/电话(341 例)、死亡(107 例)、患病(50 例)或不在本市居住(28 例)而无法联系。对 228 名参与者进行了筛查访谈,其中 57 名的评分≤0.14,171 名的评分≥0.14,16 名拒绝完成基线问卷。为 155 名患者安排了家访,但有 22 名未完成基线问卷。最终有 133 名受试者被随机分为 NV+AB(n=45)、NV 仅(n=44)和对照组(n=44)。三组基线特征无统计学差异。总体平均年龄为 76.3 岁(标准差 4.7),45%为男性。基线时,61.65%的患者被归类为衰弱。随访结束时,NV+AB 组调整后的衰弱发生率为 23.3%,对照组为 58.3%。

结论

基于 NV+AB 的干预措施似乎对衰弱评分有积极影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/998a/3558028/6e47cb00e6bf/cia-8-085Fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验