Kongngern F, Prina M, Akhter-Khan S C, Gao Q, Prince M, Mayston R
Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Faculty of Social Science and Public Policy, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Population Health Sciences Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Int J Public Health. 2025 Apr 16;70:1608089. doi: 10.3389/ijph.2025.1608089. eCollection 2025.
To synthesise evidence on the effectiveness of frailty interventions among prefrail and frail community-dwelling older adults living in low and middle-income countries (LMICs).
The four electronic databases, Embase, Ovid MEDLINE, Global Health, and APA PsycINFO, were searched until 25 September 2023. This review's protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022309998). There was no publication time or language restriction. Inclusion criteria included randomised controlled trials and other intervention types of frailty interventions that focussed on community-dwelling older adults (mean age of at least 60 years) with prefrail or frail living in LMICs. The meta-analysis could not be conducted because of the heterogeneity of frailty interventions.
This systematic review included fifteen studies: eleven were single-domain interventions (exercise, nutritional supplementation, and nurse home visits), and four were multidomain interventions (exercise plus nutrition and exercise plus mindfulness). Some evidence from high-quality studies showed that physical exercise interventions successfully addressed frailty.
This systematic review highlights the scarcity of evidence on frailty interventions in LMICs, making it difficult to evaluate their effectiveness. Additional research is needed to focus on specific types of interventions.
综合关于中低收入国家(LMICs)社区居住的脆弱前期和脆弱老年人脆弱干预措施有效性的证据。
检索了四个电子数据库,即Embase、Ovid MEDLINE、Global Health和APA PsycINFO,检索截至2023年9月25日。本综述的方案已在PROSPERO(CRD42022309998)上注册。没有出版时间或语言限制。纳入标准包括随机对照试验和其他针对LMICs中社区居住的脆弱前期或脆弱老年人(平均年龄至少60岁)的脆弱干预措施类型。由于脆弱干预措施的异质性,无法进行荟萃分析。
本系统评价纳入了15项研究:11项为单领域干预措施(运动、营养补充和护士家访),4项为多领域干预措施(运动加营养和运动加正念)。一些高质量研究的证据表明,体育锻炼干预措施成功地解决了脆弱问题。
本系统评价突出了LMICs中脆弱干预措施证据的稀缺性,难以评估其有效性。需要开展更多研究,聚焦于特定类型的干预措施。