Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Feb 5;13:32. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-32.
Maternal perception of fetal movements has been used as a measure of fetal well-being. Yet a Cochrane review does not recommend formal fetal movement counting compared to discretional fetal movement counting. There is some evidence that suggests that the quality of fetal movements can precede quantitative changes however there has been almost no assessment of how women describe movements and whether these descriptions may be useful in a clinical setting. Therefore we aimed to examine maternal perception of fetal movements using a qualitative framework.
Using a cross-sectional design we identified women during routine antenatal care at a tertiary referral hospital, in Sydney, Australia. Eligible women were pregnant ≥ 28 weeks, carrying a single child, > 18 years old, and with sufficient English literacy to self-complete a questionnaire. Post-natally the medical records were reviewed and demographic, pregnancy and fetal outcome data were extracted. Text responses to questions regarding maternal descriptions of fetal movements throughout pregnancy, were analysed using thematic analysis in an explicit process.
156 women participated. There was a general pattern to fetal movement descriptions with increasing gestation, beginning with words such as "gentle", to descriptions of "strong" and "limb" movements, and finally to "whole body" movements. Women perceived and described qualitative changes to fetal movements that changed throughout gestation. The majority (83%) reported that they were asked to assess fetal movements in an implicit qualitative method during their antenatal care. In contrast, only 16% regularly counted fetal movements and many described counting as confusing and reported that the advice they had received on counting differed.
This is the first study to use qualitative analysis to identify that pregnant women perceive fetal movements and can describe them in a relatively homogenous way throughout pregnancy that follow a general pattern of fetal growth and development. These findings suggest that women's perception of fetal wellbeing based on their own assessment of fetal movement is used in an ad hoc method in antenatal care by clinicians.
母体对胎儿运动的感知已被用作衡量胎儿健康的一种方法。然而,Cochrane 综述不建议将正式的胎儿运动计数与随意的胎儿运动计数进行比较。有一些证据表明,胎儿运动的质量可以先于定量变化,但几乎没有评估女性如何描述运动,以及这些描述在临床环境中是否有用。因此,我们旨在使用定性框架来检查母体对胎儿运动的感知。
我们采用横断面设计,在澳大利亚悉尼的一家三级转诊医院的常规产前护理期间确定了符合条件的女性。合格的女性怀孕≥28 周,单胎妊娠,年龄大于 18 岁,并且有足够的英语读写能力来自我完成问卷。产后,我们回顾了病历,并提取了人口统计学、妊娠和胎儿结局数据。使用主题分析对关于整个孕期母体对胎儿运动描述的问题的文本回复进行了分析,分析过程明确。
共有 156 名女性参与了这项研究。胎儿运动描述存在一般模式,随着妊娠的进展,描述从“轻柔”等词开始,到“有力”和“肢体”运动的描述,最后到“全身”运动的描述。女性感知到并描述了在整个孕期发生变化的胎儿运动的定性变化。大多数(83%)女性报告说,在产前护理中,她们被要求以一种隐含的定性方法评估胎儿运动。相比之下,只有 16%的女性定期计数胎儿运动,许多女性表示计数很困惑,并报告说她们收到的计数建议各不相同。
这是第一项使用定性分析来确定孕妇感知胎儿运动并能够在整个孕期以相对同质的方式描述胎儿运动的研究,这些描述遵循胎儿生长和发育的一般模式。这些发现表明,基于自身对胎儿运动的评估,女性对胎儿健康的感知是临床医生在产前护理中以一种特别的方法使用的。