Department of Public Mental Health, Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, PO Box 725 3500 AS, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
BMC Public Health. 2013 Feb 8;13:119. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-13-119.
The use of positive psychological interventions may be considered as a complementary strategy in mental health promotion and treatment. The present article constitutes a meta-analytical study of the effectiveness of positive psychology interventions for the general public and for individuals with specific psychosocial problems.
We conducted a systematic literature search using PubMed, PsychInfo, the Cochrane register, and manual searches. Forty articles, describing 39 studies, totaling 6,139 participants, met the criteria for inclusion. The outcome measures used were subjective well-being, psychological well-being and depression. Positive psychology interventions included self-help interventions, group training and individual therapy.
The standardized mean difference was 0.34 for subjective well-being, 0.20 for psychological well-being and 0.23 for depression indicating small effects for positive psychology interventions. At follow-up from three to six months, effect sizes are small, but still significant for subjective well-being and psychological well-being, indicating that effects are fairly sustainable. Heterogeneity was rather high, due to the wide diversity of the studies included. Several variables moderated the impact on depression: Interventions were more effective if they were of longer duration, if recruitment was conducted via referral or hospital, if interventions were delivered to people with certain psychosocial problems and on an individual basis, and if the study design was of low quality. Moreover, indications for publication bias were found, and the quality of the studies varied considerably.
The results of this meta-analysis show that positive psychology interventions can be effective in the enhancement of subjective well-being and psychological well-being, as well as in helping to reduce depressive symptoms. Additional high-quality peer-reviewed studies in diverse (clinical) populations are needed to strengthen the evidence-base for positive psychology interventions.
积极心理干预可被视为促进和治疗心理健康的一种补充策略。本文对积极心理干预对一般人群和特定心理社会问题人群的有效性进行了元分析研究。
我们使用 PubMed、PsychInfo、Cochrane 注册中心和手动搜索进行了系统的文献检索。符合纳入标准的有 40 篇文章,描述了 39 项研究,共有 6139 名参与者。使用的结果测量指标为主观幸福感、心理幸福感和抑郁。积极心理干预包括自助干预、小组培训和个体治疗。
主观幸福感的标准化均数差为 0.34,心理幸福感为 0.20,抑郁为 0.23,表明积极心理干预的效果较小。在 3 至 6 个月的随访中,效果大小较小,但对于主观幸福感和心理幸福感仍然显著,表明效果相当持久。由于纳入研究的多样性很高,异质性相当高。一些变量调节了对抑郁的影响:如果干预时间更长、通过转介或医院招募、针对特定心理社会问题的个体进行干预、研究设计质量较低,干预效果会更显著。此外,还发现了发表偏倚的迹象,并且研究质量差异很大。
这项荟萃分析的结果表明,积极心理干预可以有效地增强主观幸福感和心理幸福感,并有助于减轻抑郁症状。需要更多高质量的同行评议研究来加强积极心理干预的证据基础。