Suppr超能文献

传播自助:在线试验中的积极心理学练习

Disseminating self-help: positive psychology exercises in an online trial.

作者信息

Schueller Stephen M, Parks Acacia C

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Pennsylvania, Positive Psychology Center, Philadelphia, PA 94110, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2012 Jun 25;14(3):e63. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1850.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The recent growth of positive psychology has led to a proliferation in exercises to increase positive thoughts, behaviors, and emotions. Preliminary evidence suggests that these exercises hold promise as an approach for reducing depressive symptoms. These exercises are typically researched in isolation as single exercises. The current study examined the acceptability of several multi-exercise packages using online dissemination.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate methods of dissemination that could increase the acceptability and effectiveness of positive psychology exercises. To achieve this goal, we compared the use of positive psychology exercises when delivered in packages of 2, 4, or 6 exercises.

METHODS

Self-help-seeking participants enrolled in this study by visiting an online research portal. Consenting participants were randomly assigned to receive 2, 4, or 6 positive psychology exercises (or assessments only) over a 6-week period. These exercises drew from the content of group positive psychotherapy. Participants visited an automated website that distributed exercise instructions, provided email reminders, and contained the baseline and follow-up assessments. Following each exercise, participants rated their enjoyment of the exercise, answered how often they had used each technique, and completed outcome measures.

RESULTS

In total, 1364 individuals consented to participate. Attrition rates across the 2-, 4-, and 6-exercise conditions were similar at 55.5% (181/326), 55.8% (203/364), and 52.7% (168/319) respectively but were significantly greater than the attrition rate of 42.5% (151/355) for the control condition (χ(2)(3) = 16.40, P < .001). Participants in the 6-exercise condition were significant more likely than participants in the 4-exercise condition to use both the third (F(1,312) = 5.61, P = .02) and fourth (F(1,313 )= 6.03, P = .02) exercises. For 5 of the 6 exercises, enjoyment was related to continued use of the exercise at 6-week follow-up (r's = .12 to .39). All conditions produced significant reductions in depressive symptoms (F(1,656) = 94.71, P < .001); however, a significant condition by time interaction (F(3,656) = 4.77, P = .003) indicated that this reduction was larger in the groups that received 2 or 4 exercises compared with the 6-exercise or control condition.

CONCLUSION

Increasing the number of exercises presented to participants increased the use of the techniques and did not increase dropout. Participants may be more likely to use these skills when presented with a variety of options. Increasing the number of exercises delivered to participants produced a curvilinear relationship with those in the 2- and 4-exercise conditions reporting larger decreases in depressive symptoms than participants in the 6-exercise or control conditions. Although research generally offers a single exercise to test isolate effects, this study supports that studying variability in dissemination can produce important findings.

摘要

背景

近期积极心理学的发展促使旨在增加积极思维、行为和情绪的练习大量涌现。初步证据表明,这些练习有望成为减轻抑郁症状的一种方法。这些练习通常作为单一练习单独进行研究。本研究通过在线传播考察了几种多练习组合的可接受性。

目的

本研究的目的是探究能够提高积极心理学练习的可接受性和有效性的传播方法。为实现这一目标,我们比较了提供2项、4项或6项练习时积极心理学练习的使用情况。

方法

寻求自助的参与者通过访问在线研究门户参与本研究。同意参与的参与者被随机分配在6周内接受2项、4项或6项积极心理学练习(或仅接受评估)。这些练习取材于团体积极心理治疗的内容。参与者访问一个自动网站,该网站会分发练习说明、提供电子邮件提醒,并包含基线和随访评估。每项练习之后,参与者对练习的喜爱程度进行评分,回答他们使用每种技巧的频率,并完成结果测量。

结果

共有1364人同意参与。2项练习、4项练习和6项练习条件下的失访率相似,分别为55.5%(181/326)、55.8%(203/364)和52.7%(168/319),但显著高于对照组42.5%(151/355)的失访率(χ(2)(3)=16.40,P<.001)。6项练习条件下的参与者比4项练习条件下的参与者更有可能使用第三项(F(1,312)=5.61,P=.02)和第四项(F(1,313)=6.03,P=.02)练习。对于6项练习中的5项,在6周随访时,喜爱程度与继续使用该练习有关(r值为.12至.39)。所有条件下抑郁症状均显著减轻(F(1,656)=94.71,P<.001);然而,显著的条件与时间交互作用(F(3,656)=4.77,P=.003)表明,与6项练习或对照组相比,接受2项或4项练习的组中抑郁症状的减轻幅度更大。

结论

增加提供给参与者的练习数量会增加技巧的使用,且不会增加退出率。当有多种选择时,参与者可能更有可能使用这些技能。向参与者提供的练习数量增加与抑郁症状减轻之间呈曲线关系,接受2项和4项练习的参与者报告的抑郁症状减轻幅度大于接受6项练习或对照组的参与者。尽管研究通常提供单一练习来测试单独效果,但本研究支持这样的观点,即研究传播中的变异性可以产生重要发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8e16/3414858/381d93a7a09d/jmir_v14i3e63_fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验