Hussain Muadh, Purrucker Jan, Ringleb Peter, Schönenberger Silvia
Neurologische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Im Neuenheimer Feld 400, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2025 Mar;120(2):120-128. doi: 10.1007/s00063-024-01233-w. Epub 2025 Jan 9.
Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and endovascular therapy (EVT) are the cornerstones of acute ischemic stroke treatment. While IVT has been an integral part of acute therapy since the mid-1990s, EVT has evolved as one of the most effective treatments in medicine over the past decade. Traditionally, systemic thrombolysis has been performed with alteplase (rtPA). More recently, tenecteplase (TNK) has been shown to be non-inferior to rtPA. TNK has some pharmacological advantages over rtPA and may lead to earlier recanalization, particularly in large vessel occlusions. All recanalization therapies are highly time dependent. To ensure rapid treatment, standard operating procedures (SOPs) should be established and followed in clinical practice. The optimal time window for IVT is 4.5 h after symptom onset and can be extended up to 9 h using specialized imaging techniques. For EVT, studies suggest a time window up to 24 h after symptom onset. In some cases, EVT has been successfully performed beyond this time window. To select patients for EVT, advanced imaging identifying salvageable brain tissue might be necessary. Even in large ischemic stroke, EVT can still improve outcome. Compared to EVT, IVT requires fewer technical and human resources, so more stroke patients can potentially be treated. In contrast, EVT requires highly trained personnel with sophisticated equipment and can, therefore, only be performed in specialized centers. Both procedures should be combined within the 4.5 h time window for patients without contraindications.
静脉溶栓(IVT)和血管内治疗(EVT)是急性缺血性卒中治疗的基石。自20世纪90年代中期以来,IVT一直是急性治疗的重要组成部分,而在过去十年中,EVT已发展成为医学上最有效的治疗方法之一。传统上,系统性溶栓一直使用阿替普酶(rtPA)进行。最近,替奈普酶(TNK)已被证明不劣于rtPA。TNK相对于rtPA具有一些药理学优势,可能会导致更早的血管再通,尤其是在大血管闭塞的情况下。所有的再通治疗都高度依赖时间。为确保快速治疗,临床实践中应建立并遵循标准操作程序(SOP)。IVT的最佳时间窗是症状发作后4.5小时,使用专门的成像技术可将其延长至9小时。对于EVT,研究表明症状发作后的时间窗长达24小时。在某些情况下,EVT已在这个时间窗之外成功实施。为选择适合EVT的患者,可能需要先进的成像来识别可挽救的脑组织。即使是大面积缺血性卒中,EVT仍可改善预后。与EVT相比,IVT所需的技术和人力资源更少,因此更多的卒中患者有可能得到治疗。相比之下,EVT需要训练有素的人员和精密的设备,因此只能在专业中心进行。对于没有禁忌证的患者,两种治疗方法应在4.5小时的时间窗内联合使用。