Gorsky Martin
Centre for History in Public Health, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London WC1H 9SH, UK.
Med Hist. 2013 Jan;57(1):87-107. doi: 10.1017/mdh.2012.82.
This is the first of two related articles in the present volume which examine the recent history of health services management using the case of the British National Health Service (NHS). In the historiography of the NHS the 1980s is widely seen as a watershed, when public policy first sought to introduce market disciplines into its operation. Administrative and managerial reforms were central to this process, and their origins and impact have been the subject of continuing debate. This article examines and evaluates one of the key events in this history, the Griffiths NHS Inquiry of 1983, which put in place the principles of 'general management' in the NHS. Drawing on both documentary records and oral evidence it offers fresh perspectives on the reasons why the Conservative government embarked on this reform, on the workings of the inquiry team under the leadership of the businessman Roy Griffiths, and on the uneven course of the implementation of his recommendations. While its initial impact arguably did not meet the expectations of its supporters, it is suggested that several of Griffiths' key concerns have grown, not diminished, in importance as aspects of subsequent health politics. These include: the need for clinician involvement in NHS management and financing; the conundrum of how to depoliticise the central direction of the service while retaining political accountability; the desirability of measuring and improving performance; and the question of how best to incorporate the wishes of patients and public in the decision-making arena.
这是本卷中两篇相关文章的第一篇,它们以英国国民健康服务体系(NHS)为例,审视了健康服务管理的近期历史。在NHS的历史编纂中,20世纪80年代被广泛视为一个分水岭,当时公共政策首次试图将市场原则引入其运营。行政和管理改革是这一进程的核心,其起源和影响一直是持续辩论的主题。本文审视并评估了这段历史中的一个关键事件,即1983年的格里菲斯NHS调查,该调查确立了NHS的“一般管理”原则。本文利用文献记录和口述证据,就保守党政府启动这项改革的原因、在商人罗伊·格里菲斯领导下的调查团队的运作情况以及他的建议实施过程中的曲折历程,提供了新的视角。虽然其最初的影响可以说没有达到其支持者的期望,但有人认为,作为后续健康政策的一些方面,格里菲斯的几个关键关切点的重要性不但没有减弱,反而有所增强。这些关切点包括:临床医生参与NHS管理和融资的必要性;在保持政治问责制的同时,如何使服务的中央指导去政治化这一难题;衡量和提高绩效的可取性;以及如何在决策领域最好地纳入患者和公众意愿的问题。