Suppr超能文献

重度抑郁症情绪干扰任务中涉及的大脑回路。

Brain circuitries involved in emotional interference task in major depression disorder.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2013 Jul;149(1-3):136-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.01.013. Epub 2013 Feb 8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emotional and non-emotional Stroop are frequently applied to study major depressive disorder (MDD). The versions of emotional Stroop used in previous studies were not, unlike the ones employed in the present study, based on semantic incongruence, making it difficult to compare the tasks.

METHODS

We used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to study the neural and behavioral responses of 18 healthy subjects and 18 subjects with MDD to emotional and non-emotional word-face Stroop tasks based on semantic incompatibility between targets and distractors.

RESULTS

In both groups, the distractors triggered significant amounts of interference conflict. A between-groups comparison revealed hypoactivation in MDD during emotional task in areas supporting conflict resolution (lateral prefrontal cortex, parietal and extrastriate cortices) paralleled by increased response in the right amygdala. Response in the amygdala, however, did not vary between conflicting and non-conflicting trials. While in the emotional (compared to non-emotional) task healthy controls showed considerably stronger involvement of networks related to conflict resolution, in patients, the processing differences between the two conflict types were negligible.

LIMITATIONS

The patients group was inhomogeneous in terms of medication and clinical characteristics. The number of female participants was higher, due to which gender effects could not be studied or excluded.

CONCLUSION

Whilst healthy controls seemed able to adjust the involvement of the network supporting conflict resolution based on conflict demand, patients appeared to lack this capability. The reduced cortical involvement coupled with increased response of limbic structures might underlie the maladjustment vis-à-vis new demands in depressed mood.

摘要

背景

情绪和非情绪 Stroop 常被用于研究重度抑郁症(MDD)。以往研究中使用的情绪 Stroop 版本与本研究中使用的版本不同,它们不是基于语义不匹配,因此难以进行任务比较。

方法

我们使用功能磁共振成像(fMRI)研究了 18 名健康受试者和 18 名 MDD 患者对基于目标和干扰项之间语义不匹配的情绪和非情绪词-脸 Stroop 任务的神经和行为反应。

结果

在两组中,干扰项都引发了大量的干扰冲突。组间比较显示,MDD 患者在情绪任务中,支持冲突解决的区域(外侧前额叶皮质、顶叶和外纹状体皮质)的激活程度降低,同时右侧杏仁核的反应增加。然而,杏仁核的反应在冲突和非冲突试验之间没有变化。在情绪任务(与非情绪任务相比)中,健康对照组显示出与冲突解决相关的网络更强的参与,而在患者中,两种冲突类型之间的处理差异可以忽略不计。

局限性

患者组在药物和临床特征方面存在异质性。由于女性参与者较多,因此无法研究或排除性别效应。

结论

尽管健康对照组似乎能够根据冲突需求调整支持冲突解决的网络的参与程度,但患者似乎缺乏这种能力。皮质参与减少,边缘结构的反应增加,可能是抑郁情绪下对新需求的调整不当的基础。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验